Preview

Fiedler's Contingency Theory Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
620 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fiedler's Contingency Theory Essay
Fiedler's Contingency Theory
Fiedler's contingency theory states that leadership is a trait and it is fixed. Because leadership is fixed the only variable items are the situational factors. Therefore for effective leadership the situational factors need to be changed instead of the leadership traits.

Leadership trait is measured by a rating scale of 1-8 bipolar adjectives, with 1 being very poor and 8 being very good. The leader is then asked to identify any one member of a team the leader had to work with and did not get along well who is called the least preferred co-worker (LPC). If the leader scored the LPC very low (largely negative rating) then the leader is task oriented. If the leader scored the LPC very high (largely positive rating)
…show more content…
In present day, a banking call centre with meticulously designed work processes would be the “most ideal situation” based on the 3 factor criteria and army operation supervising earthquake relief operation in Nepal with complete lack of support infrastructure would be the “worst case situation”. The task oriented leader is best suited to both of these scenarios. However where the 3 factor criteria are in between such as a company like Facebook with a group of highly qualified software analysts who do not want to be given precise tasks but wish to be creative - in such a situation a relationship oriented leader is best suited for the situation. The gaps in the theory are the criteria by which a LPC is judged and the leadership scale is determined. (Ashour 1973; Schriesheim and Kerr 1977).
Path-Goal Theory
Fiedler’s theory viewed leadership traits as fixed and the situation needed to fit the leader. In the path–goal theory of leadership model by Robert House, the leadership style is more effective if the leader alters his/her leadership style to the situation they face (House 1971). So path goal leadership is a contingency leadership model. The situation that a leader faces is created by two variables, the environment characteristics and the employee’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Leaders encompass principal styles that persuade his or her values and preferences. The Fiedler contingency model centers upon suitable blending amid the leadership conditions and his or her leadership style. Determining a leader’s situation is a necessity within this model. Within the realm of The Path-Goal theory, leaders can escalate subordinate satisfaction and performance through simplifying and clearing the road to goals and by escalating the quantity and types of available rewards concerning goal achievement. The Situational Leadership Theory contends that leadership actions should adapt to match the demands of specific situations as successful leaders must…

    • 1221 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fred Maiorino Case

    • 8426 Words
    • 34 Pages

    House, R. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, p. 323. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from Business Source Complete database.…

    • 8426 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Relationship-oriented leaders are primarily concerned with developing good relationships with their subordinates and being liked by them” (Jones), because of this close relationship the subordinates want to perform well. This method has already worked well for Robin but needs to be strengthened due to the fast expansion of the organization. The first situational characteristic that plays a role in the Fiedler’s contingency model for leadership is the leader-member relation, which refers to the feelings the members have towards the leader such as fondness and trust. The more positive the feelings the better the performance in the situation. The second situational characteristic is the task structure.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ldr 531 Week 1

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Trait Approach assumes that some people are natural leaders and examines motives, values, personality, and skills. The Behavior Approach branches into two sections. One method to the Behavior Approach is to look at leader behavior. What does the leader actually do? The other portion of the Behavior approach is to determine what actions are helpful and what actions are less helpful for leaders. The Power-Influence Approach looks at leadership from the perspective of power. This approach asks the questions like, “What type of power does the leader have in regards to the followers?” This approach looks at the amount and type of influence the leader has on the people around him or her. The situational approach looks at the situation leader must deal with. This approach examines the mission of the unit, the type of organization the leader is a part of, and the nature of the work environment. The Integrative Approach involves multiple types of approaches. Participative Approach involves both the behavior and the power-influence approach. Participate leadership involves the group in decision-making and creates a sense of project ownership by the group. Members who feel empowered are more committed to mission accomplishment. For these reasons, the Participative Approach is the desired…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LDR 531 Exam

    • 1237 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The concept that some leadership attributes will work in some situations but not in others can be described by the…

    • 1237 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Two Coaches

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fiedler’s contingency model is designed to help the leader be interactive with their subordinates. The contingency model suggest that it can be determined if they will be effective in a specific setting. The two coaches that are in the case studies are effective in their approach to leadership when it comes to producing winning teams. After carefully reviewing both coaches situation it was obvious that Coach Knight would score low in the LPCs, this low score would mean that he was task driven. Then there is Coach Krzyzewski, he fits the situation where he would score a high LPC because he is motivated through relationships. Both coaches are matched well with their situation. For an example, Coach Knight¸ the highly successful basketball coach confirms Fiedler’s contingency because he is consistent in his leadership approach. Coach Knight’s intense and task-oriented technique seems unvarying. He intensely argues with referees during games and gets very upset to the point where he acts out during games. Coach Knight’s primary goal was to accomplish the task at hand and his minor needs were to build relationships while getting along with others. On the other hand, there is Coach Krzyzewski who spent time getting into his players head in order to understand their…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership Quiz Paper

    • 4345 Words
    • 18 Pages

    31. Contingency leadership theories attempt to combine the trait and behavioral theories to explain successful, influencing leader-follower relationships.…

    • 4345 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of leadership and the traits that contribute to it has experienced a fascinating transformation over time. During the evolution of leadership research, information was obtained, and questions continued, but most interesting of all is the cyclical nature of the trait-based perspective of leadership. There appeared to be recurrent questions and themes as research attempts to determine the formula for effective…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some leaders are more concerned with getting the tasks at hand completed successfully in a timely manner. Other leaders prefer creating solid interpersonal relationships with their employees, because by being an oriented leader the employee’s performance will be higher. For example, if you have a high concern for completing a task and achieving results with little concern for having a relationship with people, you would be an authority-obedience manager. Another example: if you have little concern to complete a task or interact with people, you would be an impoverished…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Contingency Model was created by Fred Fiedler in 1967; it states that the leader 's effectiveness is based on situational contingencies defined by two aspects: leadership style and situational favorableness (Miller, 2004). This model utilizes an instrument to measure an individual 's leadership orientation. The scores are ranked and leaders defined as Least Preferred Co-Worker (low-LPC or high-LPC leaders. Fiedler 's theory is that leaders have natural styles and, consequently, companies need to change the leader 's environment to suit that particular style (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2003).…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A leader’s orientation can be described by measuring the “esteem of the least preferred co-worker” scale (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). This scale, developed by Feidler, “asks the individual to think of all of the individuals with whom he has ever worked and to rate the one person with whom he could work least well” (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). Based on how the “least preferred…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Path Goal Theory

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to encourage, support and motivate their followers, Path Goal Theory requires a leader to take into account situational factors when adapting a leadership style. Successful integration of situational factors with a leadership style can lead to maximized satisfaction and effort from the follower.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robert House’s Path-Goal Leadership Theory states that effective leaders need to engage in different types of leadership behavior depending on the nature and the demands of a particular situation1. French and Raven’s Five Bases of Social Power describes how different forms of power affects one’s leadership and success.2 Mufasa portrayed these theories of management throughout his leadership of Simba, Scar, and Zazu.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uppsala Model

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The path-goal theory of leadership was developed to describe the way that leaders support and encourage their employees. Leadership style in the path-goal theory can be different by personal trait and the situation in the workplace. This leader has to remove obstacles and clarify the direction for subordinates and persuade the follower…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays