Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Ferdinand de Saussure’s Theory of Structuralism

Good Essays
603 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ferdinand de Saussure’s Theory of Structuralism
The word structure is derived from the Latin word structura which means to build. The theory of structuralism is considered to be a part of French structuralism, started in 1950s, by the cultural anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss. It is developed by Ferdinand de Saussure in his Course in General Linguistics (1915), who applied a variety of linguistic concepts in analyzing a literary text. His theory of the structure of language is considered as the origin of structuralism.
Ferdinand de Saussure believes that there are changes in language, but changes are determined by structure, rather than changes by some speaker. He thinks language should be studied synchronically, at a particular point in time. He suggests there could be a science, perhaps semiology, which studies "signs within a society" to demonstrate what signs are, and what governs them. In 1894, Saussure wrote a letter, which outlined his frustration with linguistic theory.
He writes "current terminology" is inadequate. It needs to be reformed so it can demonstrate what sort of "object of language is". Although Saussure is credited as the author of The Course in General Linguistics, which was based on his student's notes, compiled by his colleagues, and published by posthumous in 1916. His colleagues were able to identify three different theories from student's notes.
The first theory presents language from the point of view of structure. A sign may be split into two parts, one is the signifier, a sound or image, and the other is the signified, a concept. The signifier and signified produces a unit, and the unit produces signification. The value of signification is determined by how it differs from other terms. If the signification differentiate more, the value may be greater. Sounds, images, and concepts do not exist prior to their amalgamation. Signs are "interdependent" (858). The signifier and signified are inseparable; one cannot exist without the other.
In the second theory, Saussure believes there is an arbitrary nature to the assignment of signs. There are many languages, the relationship between words and things cannot be based on resemblance. He clarifies this point with an example ― there is no "inherent affinity" that motivates people to name an avian creature a bird in English, or oiseau in French (846). There are many languages with different vocabularies, which fulfill the needs of descriptors, but the descriptors may or may not be the same. The designation of a word to an external object is arbitrary.
The third theory supposes language is formed by signs, which in combination form linear movement. He clarifies the differentiation of langue or language, and parole or speech. There are two relations: the associative and syntagmatic. The associative consists of all units within the mind, but absent from the communication, while the syntagmatic consists of all units present in their verbalization. Language is the combination of a thought with a sound. For example, language is a "series of contiguous subdivisions marked off on both indefinite plane of jumble ideas, and the equally vague plane of sounds". The role of language is to serve as a connection between "thought and sound". The distinction between thought and sound implies unique separateness. It is through their separateness that language takes form.
How can language disregard the speaker? The ideas by Saussure are interesting, but appear to disregard the link between the speaker and language. For example, when George W. Bush announced, "I am the Decider:" immediately, in the consciousness of the public, a new noun was formed, the Decider. This is an example of how the speaker changes the language rather than structure changing the language. It represents an alternative not considered by this structuralism theory by Saussure.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    1. semantics: how signs relate to things  meaning 2. Pragmatics: how signs effect human behavior 3. Syntactic: signs relating to other signs…

    • 2210 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saussure divides language into langue and parole. Langue refers to system of language, the rules and conventions which organized it. Parole refers to individual utterance, the individual use of language.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Study Guide Psy 101 Exam 1

    • 2450 Words
    • 9 Pages

    -Edward Titchener: introduced Structuralism (the school of psychology that attempts to understand the structure of the mind by breaking it down into its component parts.)…

    • 2450 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An important aspect of structuralism is it was very scientific. It “marked the beginning of psychology as a science because it demonstrated that mental events could be quantified” (Stangor, 2012, p. 17). They also discovered the limitations to introspection. The structualist were also the “first to realize the importance…

    • 2978 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Matrix Liberal Humanist

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Much like the false reality in the Matrix, Saussure presents are own language as somewhat of a false reality. The words we use from day to day are just random collections of letters that we have assigned meaning too. Even those letters that make up words were created by humans and were not natural or inherited from the planet. Reality is only what we believe to be real at that point. An example of what Saussure theorizes about language would be to look at the word, "fact". In truth there is no such thing as a fact yet we look at the word and assume that whatever comes after or before it is true. At some point in time it was a fact that the world was flat. Saussure states that language is constantly moving and changing and it is outside of one man to change it. The culture shapes the language and makes it mean what the overall shift of the media or people want it to mean.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Signs and symbols are the foundation of visual language, just as the alphabet is the foundation of written language.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pinker, Stephen (1994): The Language Instinct. Harmondsworth: PenguinSapir, E. (1929): 'The Status of Linguistics as a Science '. In E. Sapir (1958): Culture, Language and Personality (ed. D. G. Mandelbaum). Berkeley, CA: University of California PressWhorf, B. L. (1940): 'Science and Linguistics ', Technology Review 42(6): 229-31, 247-8. Also in B. L. Whorf (1956): Language, Thought and Reality (ed. J. B. Carroll). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressWikipedia, accessed 04.03.2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapir-Whorf_hypothesis…

    • 1035 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One difference between the two theories was Structuralism focused all of psychology on the experience of an observer. Edward B Titchener the noted founder of structuralism stated, “the experience is dependent on the person who is actually experiencing it…” “We… assume that…[experience] goes on only when someone is there to have it” (Shultz & Shultz, 2008). Rather than focusing on a car a structualist would observe the blue shining from the reflection of the glowing source. If you were to report that this car was a blue car sitting in the sun, Titchener would refer to this as a stimuli error thereby the researcher “confuses the mental process with the object we are observing”. In contrast Functionalism would focus the mental processes required to make the car and paint it blue.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict of Views

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Structural functionalism, or simply functionalism, is a framework for building theory that sees society as a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -The main focus of structuralism is breaking down the mental processes into components and see how they interact with each other.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those individual differences that are most salient and socially relevant in people’s lives will eventually become encoded into their language; the more important such a difference, the more likely is it to become expressed as a single word.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Language and Cognition

    • 1135 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is no one standard definition for the term language, however as the term is used in psychology, certain criteria must be met for vocalizations to be considered language. The critical components of language are that it be communicative, arbitrary, structured, generative, and dynamic. The communicative property of language allows individuals to verbalize and exchange thoughts and ideas. The arbitrary property is that a given sound or symbol represents a certain thing, but it does not matter which sound or symbol is applied to which thing as long as the application is used consistently. The structure of language means that utterances must follow a pattern of established grammatical rules. The generative property of language allows for the combination of words to generate an unlimited number of meanings. The dynamic aspect means that the language is constantly growing and changing, with new words being added.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Schools of Thought

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Structuralism was first established by a German Psychologist named William Wundt Structuralism was the first school of thought in psychology, structuralism is the study of another component of consciousness. An example of structuralism is describing an experience at a particular place as giving detailed examples like the park was windy, cold, and calming. However, Functionalism, unlike structuralism was formed as a response to structuralism. Functionalism was influenced by the work of William James and Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory (Cherry, 2014). Functionalism focused on the purpose of consciousness and behavior rather than the components of the consciousness (Cherry, 2014). Functionalism influenced psychology as much as structuralism did as well as changed the meaning of the educational system.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The best way to understand and study language is to first define what language is, thereby eliminating such information as animal communication. There are five main points that language must meet are: communicative, arbitrary, structured, generative, and dynamic (Pati, 2000) (STIR, (n.d.)) (Willingham, 2007). Communicative means that the language allows at least two individuals to express themselves and understand the expressions thus are able to communicate (Pati, 2000) (STIR, (n.d)). Arbitrary means that there is no logical reason that any particular element of the language has a particular meaning, nor is there any reason that the meaning of one symbol preclude that the symbol of an opposing symbol have any similarities in its elements (Pati, 2000) (STIR, (n.d.)). Structured means that there must be rules that structure the way the symbols are put together to express meaning, and if the structure is not followed the meaning would either not have meaning, or not express the correct meaning (Pati, 2000) (STIR, (n.d.)). Generative means that that the symbols of the language can be put together in unlimited ways to…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays