Preview

Federalist 51 Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist 51 Analysis
Part I.
Short Answer: 3 points each

Directions: In your own words, please explain each of the five terms below in at least five, but no more than seven sentences. 1. Property- According to Locke, in the state of nature, property is obtained when a man exerts his labor into something and it thus becomes his. For example, when a man picks and apple off a tree the apple is then his because his body and his labor obtained the apple, so it therefore belongs to no one else. In the state of nature, however, a man can only take what he needs, for a surplus of property can only be so advantageous before some of the goods begin to spoil. Therefore, men can barter with each other to obtain their needs and give up their surplus, and eventually the
…show more content…
Federalist 51- James Madison published Federalist 51 in order to explain how the structure of the United States government protects against tyranny. Federalist 51 is interesting because it explains how the proposed U.S. government operates in terms of dualities. First, Madison explains how the structure of the U.S. government allows for mutual branches. By this he means that the relationship between the branches of government operates in a way that keeps other branches in check of their power, while also providing the “means and motives” (Madison 319) that allow for the administrators of one branch of government to protect their branch. Additionally, Madison explains how the U.S. government is different from governments, particularly monarchies, history has seen by explaining that because representatives are elected, they have to operate by and in the will of the people, contrasting monarchy that normally acts in its own self interest. What is more, however, is that Madison explains that the constitution also accounts for the “human nature” of self-interest that will inevitably control the actions of some administrators, but how the structure of the government works in a way that acting in self-interest also protects the liberty and rights of the common …show more content…
“the three races”- Tocqueville observes in Democracy in America that three races exist within the United States: whites, blacks, and Indians. Whites are the ruling race in American society, “the most powerful, the happiest” (Tocqueville 371) race, and blacks and Indians are inferior. According to what Tocqueville has observed in America, blacks in the United States “bow to the tastes of his oppressors, adopts their opinions and, by imitation, aim to unite with them” (Tocqueville 373) or, in other words, aim to assimilate with whites, whereas Indians reject European society and aim to maintain their culture and way of life, which will inevitably lead to their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The main purpose of Federalist NO. 39: The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles was to determine whether the general form and aspect of the government was strictly republican. Madison states that no other form of government, other than Republic would be compatible with the “genius of the people of America” and the “fundamental principles of the Revolution”. He then defines republic government, which is a type of government that derives it power indirectly or directly from the people; the government is administered by people who hold public office for a limited period of time or during good behavior. Madison thinks that the Constitution complies with the rules of a republican form of government. Some other people, doesn’t agree with…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a landmark examination of the American society and culture, Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America offered a unique Tocqueville provides a fascinating account of three oppressed ethnic groups in America, the Negroes and the Indians. “these two unlucky races have in common neither birth, appearances, language, nor mores,” In comparatively Outsider’s thought on liberty and its limitations amongst the inhabitants of the United States, particularly in the relations of three races “naturally distinct and hostile to one another”. Though this provocative comparison may initially appear to be vast however his analysis proves that the allegory is outstanding and well-constructed. Moreover, the equality informs a new mode of cooperation…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Federalist Paper Number 10 Madison writes, “Among the numerous advantages promised by a well-constructed Union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tenancy to break and control the violence of faction”. He specifically explains how a union will be problematic in that would cause the government to be unstable and ultimately lead to injustice. Instead, he argues for the importance of the braking and controlling factions instead. Madison views factions as dangerous to the republic government because they operate in self-interest while ignoring the rights and interest of citizens especially minorities. To combat the challenges that factions pose to government Madison states that, “Either the existences of the same passion…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first being the state of nature as defined by Thomas Hobbes is that of a pre-societal state. In general terms this means there would be no government or any form of laws, leading citizens towards a constant state of war. As a result of this, people would be motivated solely by self interest, and would not have any regards towards others needs. This relates to a lecture on Zombies and Sociology given by Dr. Peters. Dr. Peter’s pointed out the fact that society begins to fail as a whole when its institutions breakdown. Government, the economy, religion, education, media and family are all institutions of society. In a Hobbesian state of nature it is likely that very few of these intuitions would continue to stand, the first to go being government and economy. It is also worth noting that in a Hobbesian state of nature, individuals are motivated to act out of fear, which Professor Gillard mentioned in his lecture. This explains why people act only to meet their personal needs, they are so blinded by fear that they fail to rationalize the needs of others. Locke takes a different approach when it comes to defining the state of nature, which places more emphasis on…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 9 Analysis

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Within the federalist papers, there is discussion of improvements in political science in republican government. Publius first discusses improvements in political science in regards to an extended republic in Federalist 9, then builds on his arguments in Federalist 10 and 51. In Federalist 9, there are five specific improvements to the science of politics that are discussed. These improvements are separation of powers, legislative checks and balances, an independent judiciary, representation, and, perhaps most importantly, the idea of an extended republic. Federalist 9 also speaks heavily of how these advances of political science reduce the natural imperfections of republican government. Voting on legislation is done via representation, in…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1700’s our founding fathers wrote many documents to control the government in their time and make it better for the future. One of the most influential groups of essays written are the Federalist Papers. Written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay these papers were made to promote the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. SInce the papers were written such a long time ago, some have become outdated and are no longer useful in today's society. Federalist Paper 51 is one of the most powerful and popular of the essays written. Written by Alexander Hamilton, the paper explains how the government should run including the necessity of checks and balances and exclusion of government…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalist had good reasoning for what they believed in, but the one side that stuck out to me was the Federalist side. The Federalists believed that America was headed in the wrong direction with the Articles of Confederation. It was believed by the Federalists that we needed a stronger national government because that would help protect individual rights. They also believed that we were in need of a new constitution or we just needed to change the constitution a bit. The Anti-Federalists believed that our national government shouldn’t be so strong or else it would turn into the British government, which was cruel, and harsh. But what would happen if our national government were to become weak all of the sudden,…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    problem; in fact the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians…

    • 2210 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical modes

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Avoid terms that are too simple, that lack complexity. Give strong details of each example.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexis de Tocqueville is a French author and historian. Tocqueville’s text Democracy in America takes place in the 1830s and the French are the main audience. Analyzing Tocqueville’s observations of America is important because it teaches the livelihood of people around the time this novel is written. The lifestyle of the people around this time was consumed with racism and prejudice in the form of slavery. America still has racism and prejudice today, but in the form of name-calling and actions towards another person instead of slavery.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is no property in the state of nature in Hobbes, it is just man vrs man. For Locke, you can have a property in the state of nature, which is from the labor of your hands. Locke has two conditions which is you must leave as much and as good for others and you must not take more of God’s creations than you need.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state of nature means to have no government and we have the rights to life, liberty, and property, which were given to everyone by God. There are three parts that make up the state of nature, which include the law of nature, state of equality, and state of liberty. John Locke first describes the state that every person was in. He says that we are all individuals, who are able to act and give away our belongings or ourselves without having to be under…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federalism was needed in the Constitution to make sure that the national government did not gain too much power. After the revolution, many people feared a monarchy or any form of government in which the central ruling body had too much power. The framers wanted the states to have much more power than the national government, and allowed the national government power only in areas that concerned the nation as a whole. Areas such as war, negotiation, and foreign commerce were some of the only circumstances in which the national government had absolute power. By limiting the national governments power in this way, the writers felt that they had ensured the sovereignty of the individual states. Also, people have a tendency to feel more connected to their state government than they would a national government. Therefore, by giving the states more power, people are more likely to be happy with their government. Federalist papers 45 and 46 are both arguments by James Madison as to why the people should not be afraid of the proposed Constitution and the powers it entailed regarding the national government. In paper 45, he shows that without the state legislatures a president cannot be elected. The same is true for the Senate and the House of Representatives. Madison also stated in paper 45 that the number of tax collectors that the national government will have compared to the number employed by the state governments is very small. The powers given to…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Contract Theory

    • 1693 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Locke’s theory does not give an individual the freedom to do as he or she chooses, even if he or she believes it is in his or her best interest. The state of nature will not deal with civil power or regime that will penalize a person for his or her judgment for his or her lack of correct judgment for the laws in which it proves one individual has no morals. An individual is under the assumption that each individual is equal to the next individual. Therefore, each individual has the capability of defining the Law of Nature, the implications with the law of nature say that individuals will have…

    • 1693 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Locke Questions

    • 938 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. John Locke describes the “state of nature” as a sort of equality between men. No man has any rights over the other, and they can be free in doing what they want. All being able to use the same faculties. Locke also explains that although they are free it does not give them the right to hurt one another because the “natural law” still exists even through the “state of nature”. Locke defines the state of nature as political power. This “state of nature” is basically where humans can exist without a government or social contract. And that people would follow this “law of nature” and would protect it against anyone who did not follow it. “The execution of the law of Nature is in that state put into every man’s hands, whereby everyone has a right to punish the transgressors of that law to such a degree as may hinder its violation.” Locke also mentions that eventually people would try to form a government to try to protect their rights further. The “state of nature” is more of a thought rather than something that actually happened in history.…

    • 938 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays