Preview

Federalist 9 Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
970 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist 9 Analysis
Within the federalist papers, there is discussion of improvements in political science in republican government. Publius first discusses improvements in political science in regards to an extended republic in Federalist 9, then builds on his arguments in Federalist 10 and 51. In Federalist 9, there are five specific improvements to the science of politics that are discussed. These improvements are separation of powers, legislative checks and balances, an independent judiciary, representation, and, perhaps most importantly, the idea of an extended republic. Federalist 9 also speaks heavily of how these advances of political science reduce the natural imperfections of republican government. Voting on legislation is done via representation, in …show more content…
This prevents people’s immediate passions and reactions from ruling directly, as well as preventing the voters from voting poorly on legislation. In regards to the independent judiciary, it prevents the people from both creating and interpreting the laws, and prevents the general population from judging themselves. Publius continues with the imperfections of republican government and how they can be lessened in Federalist 10.
Federalist 10 focuses on the idea of factions in republican government. Factions are an imperfection of government, where a group of individuals is united by some passion or interest. To alleviate the problems of factions, there are two solutions. The first is to remove the causes of factions, one of which is to destroy liberty. Destroying liberty is worse than the problem of factions itself, as it destroys political life. One could also just give everyone the exact same opinions, interests and passions, but that is impractical or impossible. The second solution to the problem of factions is to control its effects. The way to control the effects of factions, Publius argues, is through republican …show more content…
These are expanded upon in Federalist 10 and 51, and greatly affect both republican government, and the Congress. These advances control the amount of power within the government and separate it, and reduce the impact of factions within government, all while giving representation to the people. The extended republic also affects congress, and helps lessen the impact of factions, as well as imperfections with republican government in general. Overall, these advances hold true to the virtues of republican government, while reducing the impact of imperfections of republican
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eco Bottle Lab Report
    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Eco Bottle Lab Report

    2. Federalism divides the power between national and state governments, which in return, limits the power of the national government. Checks and balances is a way that limits the power of each branch of government by not allowing one branch to have too much power which in return limits the power of the national government. The Establishment Clause prevents the national government to discriminate others based on their religion and/or prevents them to show preferential treatment for one religion over another. Guarantee of public trial means that trials must be open to the public which limits the government’s ability to violate the rights of citizens.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Summary
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 Summary

    Federalist No. 10 addresses the question of how to guard against "factions", or groups of citizens, with interests contrary to the rights of others or the interests of the whole community. Madison saw factions as inevitable due to the nature of man - that is, as long as men hold differing opinions, have differing amounts of wealth, and own differing amount of property, they will continue to form alliances with people who are most similar to them, and they will sometimes work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others. Thus, he questions how to guard against those dangers. Federalist No. 10 continues a theme begun in Federalist No. 9; it is titled, "The Same Subject Continued: The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison
    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Analysis: 'The Federalist 41 And 45' By James Madison

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    "A free republic cannot succeed over a country of such immense extent, containing such a number of inhabitants......as that of the whole United States." (Brutus I) First of all, anti-federalists thought that a republic must be small and uniform to survive. The United States was a large country that had 1200 miles long and 200 miles inland, and it also had big population which had wide range of religions and races. They thought if a national government had a strong power that would insulate from the people and would abuse the power to deprive the powers belonged to the states. For instance, the legislature of the U.S had great and uncontroulable powers: the Congress would tax heavily from the states and regulate the inter-states trade; the Supreme Court would overrule state courts; and the president would come to raise and support large armies. Brutus noted Article I, Sec. 8 implied powers "the necessary and proper." It meant that the states reserved certain powers, and considerable powers could be added. Also, a strong central government would threaten the rights of common people. Because the Constitution was created by…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist Paper 10 And 51

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hi list of my future
    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages

    hi list of my future

    1. Madison states that factions can include either a minority or majority of the population.…

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did James Madison Contribute To The Tyranny Of The Constitution
    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did James Madison Contribute To The Tyranny Of The Constitution

    Madison made his concern of tyranny known especially in the 10th Federalist Paper, with some mention in his other papers, and writings including the Constitution in which his contributions were heavily influenced by his concerns. Factions were a legitimate threat, and the greatest of the potential evils for the United States because the good of the public would be disregarded by the majority faction, and they would make hasty decisions that would harm the country. The greatest cause for factions as described by Madison in the tenth federalist paper is different degrees of possession of…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of James Madison's The Federalist No. 10
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of James Madison's The Federalist No. 10

    In James Madison’s The Federalist, No.10, he argues that factions are harmful, therefore a large republic must be created in order to keep it from becoming a faction.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Federalist 10
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Federalist 10

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Energy In The Executive Analysis
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Energy In The Executive Analysis

    In Federalist Papers 69 and 70, Publius takes for granted that “all men of sense will agree in the necessity of an energetic Executive” and speaks extensively on the importance of an energetic executive in maintaining an efficient government that best protects the liberties of the citizens in which it governs, thus refuting the popular notion that an active executive is incompatible with the republican form of government.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Views On Factionalism
    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison's Views On Factionalism

    He is of the assumption that human nature is inherent in conflicting interests. He wants to evade an instance where a single group controls the decisions of the society. Majority principle alongside free elections will shield the nation from dictatorship. There exist checks as well as balances so as to ensure that there are several points of entry into the government and numerous ways of offsetting the powers that one branch of the government possess. Madison has an awareness that preservation of state governments will be of assistance in maintaining liberty and…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federal Government Benefits
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti-Federal Government Benefits

    Two different plans were devised in a convention. The Federalists, the majority, implemented the Virginia plan, a statewide government based on the population. “The federalists supported the constitution and preferred a strong national government,” (pg. 57). The Anti-Federalists supported the New Jersey plan, where each state gets the same amount of representation. “The Anti-Federalist opposed the constitution and preferred a decentralized federal government; they took their name by default, in reaction to their better –organized opponents,” (pg. 57). Both parties agreed that government should be limited, but they disagreed on what the limits should be. I believe the Federalists will serve better with a government with broad powers that has…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    fed and anti fed
    • 2782 Words
    • 12 Pages

    fed and anti fed

    According to Madison factions create “instability, injustice, confusion and violence.” By factions federalist No. 10 clearly states “a number of citizens, whether they amount to a majority or a minority of the whole. The two main groups that Madison refers to are the minority and majority groups. The first consisting of “considerate and virtuous citizens.” In other words the wealthy and well educated privileged persons. The latter being “an interested and overbearing majority ”consisting mostly of day-to-day laborers poor in education and rich in numbers. Factions are formed because people are either united or separated by common interest regarding their own and the rights of other citizens. Factions are formed over issues like private faith, personal liberty… Madison admits that the first object of government is to protect the diversity in the faculties of men, which enable him to acquire property. This is the main issue responsible of forming factions, the acquisition of property. However men have “unequal faculties of acquiring property.” Madison further explains the existence of factions: “as long as man finds a connection between his reason and self love his opinions and his actions will have an equal influence on each other.” This is why both minority and majority factions are dangerous. Both groups separately pursue and act in favor of their own interest thus creating “unsteadiness and injustice” with in the public administrations.…

    • 2782 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson's Views On Revolution
    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Jefferson's Views On Revolution

    Publius felt that even though it is essential for government to allow change and ratification, it shouldn’t be a reoccurring event. “ Frequent appeals would, in a great measure, deprive the government of that veneration which time bestows on everything, and without which perhaps the wisest and freest governments would not possess the requisite stability” (Publius, No. 49 p.262). If the government wasn’t as concrete and foundational, popular opinion and passions would be adhered to rather than close deliberation and consideration. It wouldn’t be as much of a risk to call for revolution or accept change in government if the society was ideal and everyone had a love of philosophy, but this is simply not the case and Publius understood that factor. Although Publius understood the necessity of the convention for altering the constitution, it should be postponed “for certain and extraordinary occasions”. (Publius, No. 49 p.261) This is to ensure and protect a stable government that doesn’t always bend to the will of its constituents. It also gives the active participants in energetic government more power by conserving power in the constitution rather than in the will of the general public. Since the three branches of government get their power from the constitution, and the people made the constitution, power comes from the individual. Publius wanted that to be understood but didn’t fully trust the general public so that is why they are not in favor of change as much as Jefferson because only aristocrats are better suited to know when changes in government are necessities. The general public doesn’t act on their reason a lone, and passions are usually the fuel for wanting certain change or action. This alone makes Publius have a more conservative outlook on change and…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Protection Of Minorities Essay
    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Protection Of Minorities Essay

    In the Federalist Papers, Federalist Number 10 states that factions in America are destined to be created and are bad for society, especially minorities. Factions are bad for minorities because factions are groups of people with a common interest adverse to the rights of others. The United States Constitution protects minorities from factions by breaking them up. Factions are broken up by extending the sphere. Extending the sphere creates more diversity, more qualified representatives, and more choices for representatives. By creating more diversity, the United States Constitution allows more ideas to be entered into American politics. This will help to ensure the protection of minorities. Minorities are also protected because the larger the sphere, the larger the population of qualified representatives. The larger the population of qualified representatives, the larger the chance that the representatives will act in a manner that includes minorities when making their decisions. Extending the sphere helps the United States Constitution to protects the ability for more than just one person to run for office. Because there are more people to possibly elect, corrupt politicians are easier to eliminate. There are many ways that citizens see how minorities are protected. For example, in modern politics the United States Constitution protects minorities via Brown v. the Board of Education. Brown v. the Board of Education insured…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics