Preview

Federalism in Malaysia

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2083 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalism in Malaysia
FEDERALISM IN MALAYSIA
By: Iffa Syafiqa
Introduction
The existence of federalism in Malaysian history dates back in 1895 during the establishment of the Federated Malay States which are the ‘Protected States’ of Selangor, Negeri Sembilan, Pahang and Perak. Federation of Malaya then came later in 1948 with the unification of the nine Malay states and Settlements of Penang and Malacca by the British.
Federal principle was described by K.C. Wheare as "the method of dividing powers so that the general and regional governments are each within a sphere co- ordinate and independent." His definition elaborates that under a federal system, there lies an autonomous sphere of power resides in each of the general and the regional government in which can be exercised independently of the other level. Wheare’s definition on federal principle is the separateness of the central and regional authorities and this provides the distinction of a federal government from other forms of government.
A.V. Dicey, also another scholar identified the three leading characteristics of a "completely developed federalism" herein includes the distribution of powers among governmental bodies (each with limited and coordinate powers), along with the supremacy of the constitution and the authority of the courts as the interpreters of the constitution.
Throughout this circa 118 years since 1895, Malaysia has been evolving in the application of this federal principle, being practiced the federal parliamentary democracy with a constitutional monarch. The objective of this paperwork is to analyse whether or not Malaysia is applying the true concept of federalism in which lies the occurrence of separate central and regional authorities. It is also to be taken as a main concern whether or not Malaysia is merely practicing a ‘quasi-federation’ system. Facts and further analyses of distinguished authors will be provided to strengthen this paperwork with factual legitimacies.

Federal Constitution



Bibliography: Abdul Aziz Bari, F. S. (2004). Constitution of Malaysia: Text and Commentary. Pearson Prentice Hall. Aun, W. M. (1975). The Malaysian Legal System (1st Ed.). London: Heinemann Educational Books (Asia). Aun, W. M. (1996). The Malaysian Legal System (2nd ed.). London: Longman Malaysia . Faruqi, S. S. (2008). Document of Destiny - The Constitution of the Federation of Malaysia. Malaysia: Star Publications (Malaysia) Berhad. Monahan, P. J. (1997). A. Federalism Defined. Retrieved from Constitutional Law (1997): http://www.angelfire.com/ca/globalcom/freeniversity/4_1.htm Saleem, M. Y. (n.d.). Chapter4 - Federalism: Origin and Applications.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    AP GOV FEDERALISM HOMEWORK

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. Federalism is the government authority shared by national and local governments. Federalism matters because it dictates the power that belongs to the state and the power that belongs to the government.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is a political system in which power is divided and shared between the national government and the states. There are four types of federalism -- Dual Federalism, Cooperative Federalism, Regulated Federalism and New Federalism.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalism is the system of government in which power is dispersed between central and state governments, each level of government having different responsibilities.…

    • 2083 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constitution Study Guide

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalism- Authority is divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units (such as states)…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism is a system where the governmental authority is divided between national and state government. As a result, federalism is always limiting the power of the national executive.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some of the features of federalism include the different powers that are seen within the central and state governments. Within state governments it can be seen that issues on crime and punishment can vary between states as states are awarded the power to choose different policies on these issues. This is why some stats still adopt the death penalty and others have abolished it. At the central level of government it can be seen however that issues such as war, diplomacy and the powers of defence are issues that the central government must control as it can be seen that local governments will be unable to handle these major issues successfully. One of the most important powers which the States have control of, is the power to conduct elections in whichever way they see fit. An example of this would be that Iowa choose to elect their…

    • 1456 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One great achievement of the american founding was the creation of an effective constitutional structure. There are 2 important aspects of the U.S. foundation, the federalism and the constitution. The framers of the constitution knew that it will be important to divide the powers of the governmental power, because that way there will not be abuse of the power. Separation of powers imposes internal limits by dividing government against itself, giving different branches separate functions and forcing them to share power. Federalism is the system of government in which power is divided between a central government and regional governments, in the United States, both the national government and the state governments possess a…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided, by a constitution, between the central (national) government and regional (state) governments. (Ch.3, p. 67). An advantage of a strong national government is that whenever there is a conflict between national and state governments, the national government will always prevail. The doctrine of national supremacy says that the Constitution and the Laws of the United States is the supreme Law of the Land, which extends to state courts and constitutions.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The need to examine and discuss federalism beyond the boundaries that define the United States is something that should not be ignored. To that point the paper will look to examine other forms of federalism implemented throughout the world. It will also look to answer if it is a feasible form of government around the…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Why was separation inevitable? Economic reasons Delays in setting up common market Imposition of new taxes on Singapore Attempts to increase Spore’s contribution to the central government Political reasons Political rivalry Racial politics Effects of the Malaysian Malaysia campaign…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The views of Maine and Savigny had indeed contributed to some provisions in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. Before the discussion proceeds in looking into provision that reflects the views of Maine and Savigny, it is better for us to understand first, what are the views suggested, or rather arguments put forward by these two jurists.…

    • 4238 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Initially, the British followed a policy of non-intervention in relation between the Malay states.[19] The commercial importance of tin mining in the Malay states to merchants in the Straits Settlements led to infighting between the aristocracy on the peninsula. The destabilisation of these states damaged the commerce in the area, causing British intervention. The wealth of Perak’s tin mines made political stability there a priority for British investors, and Perak was thus the first Malay state to agree to the supervision of a British resident.[14] British gunboat diplomacy was employed to bring about a peaceful resolution to civil disturbances caused by Chinese and Malay gangsters employed in a political tussle between Ngah Ibrahim and Raja Muda Abdullah. The Pangkor Treaty of 1874 paved the way for the expansion of British influence in Malaya. The British concluded treaties with some Malay states, installing “residents” who advised the Sultans and soon became the effective rulers of their states.[28] These advisors held power in everything except to do with Malay religion and customs.[14]…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sources of Law: statutes, law reports, text books, religious beliefs, local customs, opinion of jurists…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    SOME states might have their own peculiar issues, but on a national scale, the issues that are likely to dominate this general election fall under three broad categories: race relations, governance and economic wellbeing. These categories are not watertight compartments and a given policy issue can affect all of them, but they offer a simple and convenient way to understand the electoral issues. Formulated in this general way, these categories are familiar and longstanding in Malaysian politics, although there are changes in specific issues and their saliency. The specific issues also tend to evoke different levels of concern and indeed to be seen in significantly different ways among various groups in society.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    purpose malayan union

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tun Abdul Razak was to be the man who had to fulfil the need of country for a dynamic new leader with enough personal magnetism to unite its multi-racial population after the resignation of Tun Abdul Rahman. Because among the leaders of the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), Tun Abdul Rahman was probably the one person who had enjoyed the trust and confidence of all races in the country. He was the leader of the struggle for independence. Tun Abdul Rahman in the forefront for the formation of Malaysia, he led the Malaysian campaign against Indonesia’s confrontation, the biggest post-independence external threat to the security of the country. (ZAINUDDIN, 1999, p. 167) That why Tun Abdul Razak has been choose because with the circumstance of the racial antagonism between the Malay and the Chinese still hanging for his experience.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays