Preview

Explore the Way Miller Dramatises Conflicts Between John and Elizabeth Proctor in the Crucible

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explore the Way Miller Dramatises Conflicts Between John and Elizabeth Proctor in the Crucible
Arthur Miller uses a number of devices in order to dramatise the conflict between John and Elizabeth. The device that is most apart to the audience is the staging. Miller very effectively uses this to physically show that there is a deep rift running through their relationship, and home. The large and detailed opening stage direction shows that he has put a lot of thought into how he wanted to portray his feelings. The opening directions describe the house as “low, dark... and empty”. This is symbolic of the state of their relationship, and immediately sets the scene for the “empty” conversation which follows.
The Act opens with Elizabeth upstairs, and John entering from outside. This alone shows that there is a feeling of separation between them, as Miller could have easily started the scene with them both in the room. This creates a feeling of tension in the audience from the beginning. The third use of staging is when Elizabeth turns her back to John, after the already stilted conversation ground to a halt. Miller writes in the stage directions, “a sense of their separation arises”. In a normal setting, this act would otherwise be acceptable, yet in this context it is obvious there is an ulterior motive. For the audience, this would show that she had an opposing idea to John’s yet she doesn’t want to speak out as it’s not her place as a Puritan wife. Later, in Act Four, Arthur Miller again uses staging to good effect with the entrance of John into the room in which Elizabeth, Hale, Parris and Danforth are situated. This staging is so powerful, that “the emotion flowing between them prevents anyone from speaking”. This is the beginning of the conclusion of the passionless gap that had separated them so far.
Miller also uses several well placed pauses. These pauses convey to the audience that they are struggling with what they have to say, and this is because the content is opposing. Elizabeth does not want to tell him to confess, yet he believes he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Crucible can be seen from many different perspectives. There can be much debate over who is right and who is wrong according to morals and values. The differences between the movie and the play, although subtle, affect the way the work is viewed as a whole. In The Crucible, the chronological ordering in which the movie, directed by Nicholes Hytner, and the play, written by Arthur Miller, is set up affects the way things are viewed from not only each character’s point of view, but as well as the audience’s; helping to prove that even if you carve two different paths you will still end up at the same destination.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The set being compacted towards the edges of the stage with a large open area allowed the setting of the play to easily present a small country town, iconic locations within a town on the edges of the stage gave the ever present vision of a small town. The large open area in the centre of the stage was adaptable and used during various scenes, although most notably, the outback scenes presenting a large open space opening the space compared to other scenes and indicating the environment base of the play. The use of footage of sand falling in-between scenes represented that time consistently progressed within the play, with each event leading to the larger events growing in impact on the play. Due the complex stage design spotlighting was used to draw focus to the performers, coloured lighting was also incorporated for ambient effects during scenes. Blocking on the set was made minimal to avoid wandering into separate scene locations although using spotlights and lighting position as well as props such as empty chairs were used to emphasise divide in characters with character interacting closely in aggressive and intermit moments. An example of conflict causing both intimacy and aggressive monuments is during Alan attempting to persuade the character Veronica a member of the historical society whom was involved in pro-acknowledgement campaigning to join him after having turned the town against her, a chair is left empty as a divide between the character while Alan attacks her ideals however once Alan decides a more friendly approach they sit beside each other as Alan attempts to persuade her to side with him. During this scene conversation between the characters was fairly hostile and consider of Alan denouncing Veronica’s ideals as she struggled to fight back against Alan’s judgement, this resulted in Alan looking down on her and placing himself…

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The following two acts deal with the results of John’s inability to teach. John has succumbed to the lust for power, making him serve himself rather than his students. He controls the action in the office and dominates over Carol…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Each Act takes happens in the same place. The entire play takes place in the jury room of a New York City court of law in 1957 during a very hot summer afternoon. It is a large, dull, minimalistic room with three windows in the brick wall which the skyline of New York City can be seen. There is also a wash room and lavatory off the jury room. There is a large, scarred table in the centre with twelve chairs around it. There are pencils pads and an ashtray on the table. There is also a water cooler in the room with plastic cups. The dullness of the room may signify and provide a mood for the act and is evident in the interactions between the jurors. The Twelve jurors are all seemingly awkward and uneasy towards each other once they enter the room.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Salem witch trials, hundreds of people were killed due to suspicion of witchcraft. In the book the crucible by Arther Miller a big concern for most readers was: who had the most conflict. Throughout the book many characters had disagreements with others. As people argued they eventually came to a point where people were accused of witchcraft and could be killed for it. Some people say John Procter had the most conflict and Abigail didn't because she was a bad person, but I believe even though she is bad she still had the most conflict. Despite others being in conflict, Abigail had the most conflict because she had to worry about who gets hurt in the situation and getting caught lying. She goes through plenty of trouble trying to escape from these things.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many movie directors base their stories on a book, while changing the plot and scenes to fit the taste of the public. For example, in most plays, people look for drama, but not for action since everything is done live on stage. Much of the dialogue in the remains the same, but Arthur Miller does create a few differences between his play and the movie for it to appeal to more people. One of the differences is much more emphasis on the theme of romance in the movie rather than in the original play, which emphasized more on the motif of lies. To emphasize this theme, the movie has added some scenes between Abigail Williams and John Proctor. The first scene, which is added, is their meeting in the woods when he tells her that if his wife is convicted, he will kill her. The second scene is when Abigail is running away and she tells him that she could bribe the guard and the two would be run off somewhere. In the movie however, it is to the point with the lies, then the convictions and then the hangings. Some of the other scenes are interchanged with others to make it more meaningful, but the majority of the play can be recognized in the movie. Thus, there are differences as well as similarities in the movie, which are all based on Arthur Miller's interpretation, and his changing of ideas to attract the…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does an author always have to stick to conventions in writing? A dramatic convention is an unrealistic element in a literary work that is accepted by readers or viewers because it is traditional. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller deviates from traditional drama conventions in his telling of the Salem Witch Trials. He does not use scenes and uses a narrative technique more than stage directions throughout the play.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our first change takes place before the story even started. John had loved Elizabeth and still does- or so he says, but if he loved her so much why would he cheat on her? Well with every affair somebody finds out eventually, and Elizabeth did. She did forgive him and they didn’t speak a word of it out in public. Every day John does all that he can to earn back her trust and to make her happy again. Elizabeth refuses to give him the chance because she knows he still likes his mistress, Abby, even though he doesn’t think he does. Elizabeth knows that Abby accused her of being a witch in court because she wants her dead so she can have John all to herself. This is the reason Elizabeth tells John to go to court and get Mary to tell them they were…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the play takes place, Abigail Williams and John Proctor had an affair while Abigail was working as a servant in their home. Eventually, John confessed and apologized to Elizabeth, pledging his faithfulness to her. Nonetheless, at the time the play takes place, Elizabeth still hasn't fully forgiven him, and gives him a hard time about it. Abigail confessed the pretense of her accusations to him when they were alone, and now he has no way to prove that she's lying to the court. But because he was alone with her again, Elizabeth becomes angry with him. She still doubts her husband because she feels that if it were any other girl he had to go testify against, he would not hesitate. But, because it's Abigail, John feels he has to think harder on making a decision. He doesn't want his name spoiled by a counter-testimony. John feels he is now justified in becoming angry because for the seven months since his confession, he has done nothing but try to please his wife, and she still approaches him with suspicion and accusations. Proctor feels that she will "forget nothin' and forgive nothin'." Elizabeth argues back that he then shouldn't do anything to make her suspicious. This is a trial on their true love, and at that time, things aren't going well. It will take love, trust and forgiveness for the marriage to survive.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John is a loving husband. He proves that by telling Elizabeth, “It is well seasoned” (p. 48) in reference to the rabbit she cooked, in which he had to add salt to. He likes to make her happy, which shows he loves her, and so he asks, “Would that please you?” (p.48) He is asking in reference to buying a heifer for her if the crops are good. He assures her he will “fall like an ocean on that court” by which he shows his love in caring for her freedom (p.73). To the court he admits he has “known her” he is talking about Abigail and their affair (p.102). He is showing his love towards his wife by throwing away his freedom, life, honor, dignity, and pride to prove Elizabeth’s innocence and have her freedom. He tells Elizabeth to “show honor now” as he is to be hanged in the gallows (p. 133). He is showing his love for her by letting her know he cares about her enough to want her to be strong even though he is to die.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When John talks with Elizabeth, he demonstrates how much he wants to fix his relationship with Elizabeth ‘I mean to please you Elizabeth’ ‘I have gone on…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the story, John expresses qualities of an honest man by defending his wife Elizabeth when she is accused of hurting Abigail. John defends Elizabeth” Herrick! Herrick don’t chain her” (page 177: Proctor) in many ways despite the hardship they have been going through with their marriage. With tension between the two because of John’s affair with Abigail, Elizabeth and John have been falling apart. However, in some divine way, John forfeits his good name when he tells the court of his affair. In doing so, John has lost what makes him honorable, but Elizabeth seeing this has brought new perspective upon her relationship with her husband. She forgave him. John doing the unimaginable to seek his wife’s forgiveness is a true example of a dynamic change throughout the story.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This play is a tale of two lovers, tied together by death due to ancient family hostility. Throughout the play, this couple, madly in love, made every effort to see each other. The love-struck pair secretly wed and planned to escape Verona together. Despite their families’ many quarrels, true love prevailed; they died in each other’s embraces and the feud between the Montagues and the Capulets came to an end. In Romeo and Juliet, a sweetly painful drama, Shakespeare uses metaphors, oxymorons, and foreshadowing to convey powerful emotions.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The moment in which Elizabeth tells a lie in order to save her husband’s life, indicates dramatic irony. The playwright makes this happen when first John Proctor calls Abigail’s a whore and, in spite of the humiliation he felt, revealed his affair with her. As Danforth cannot believe the seventeen year-old girl is actually a “whore”, he asks Goody Proctor to come up to test the truth of this charge. Before she enters the court, John swears Elizabeth is an extremely honest woman so when she denies his adultery to save him, there is a contrast as she is supposed to be trustful. They both risk their good name with the intention of saving each other’s life in different ways: John confessing his sin and Elizabeth lying. The drama and the irony are clearly shown by Miller in two relevant aspects.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oleanna Essay (Power)

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John shows power through his book, he’s put it on the list that his students have to study during the course. But, in one point of the play John refers to academic freedom but he’s making his students read his book. John’s agenda is money, he needs it to put down a deposit for his new house, to take care of his wife and his son. John’s temper starts to spark as Carol irritates him further, he begins to be blunt and his lines become shorter.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics