Preview

Explain The Term Class Dealignment Used In The Extract.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
862 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain The Term Class Dealignment Used In The Extract.
Participation and Voting Behaviour
1. Explain the term class dealignment used in the extract. (5 marks) Class dealignment can be described as the relationship between social class and voting behaviour weakening, meaning that the electorate are beginning to vote for political parties which are not generally associated with their social class. The extract quotes “In the 1960s, Peter Pulzer concluded that, 'class is the basis of British party politics.'” The 1970s showed how the electorate strongly stuck to voting for parties based on their social class, and confirms Pulzer's ideas. In '74, 56% of the Conservatives support was from ABC1 classes, whilst the majority of Labours was from C2 and DE classes. The table in the extract shows how the percentage change of C1, C2 and DE class votes for the Labour party has decreased greatly – 11% for C2 and 8% for DE - which confirms the idea of class dealignment, as people from working class backgrounds such as C2 and DE have been more likely to vote for Labour in the past.
…show more content…
One reason for this could be because the 1980s introduced a new form of voters – known as “working class Tories”. The Conservative party gave the middle class the opportunity to purchase houses previously owned by the council. This allowed for them to own property – something that was only previously achievable by the upper classes. By doing this, Thatcher increased the working class support for the Conservative party which shows class dealignment. The 1974 general election showed C2 and DE classes voting for the conservative party at 26% and 22% of the electorate. However in 1979, when Thatcher gave these classes the opportunity to purchases houses, they increased to 41% and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another reason why Conservatives won is that in there manifesto they promised to stabilise the cost of living which would close the gap between rich and poor and double everyone’s standard of living. This was helped by Labour being identified with the working class rather than the nation as a whole. This was a problem as 40% of manual workers now considered themselves middle class so the Labour policies for the unemployed and working class no longer appealed to them, instead they…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tendency of a given social class to vote for a party that promotes its economic interest…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Possibly the most important reason for the Tory victory was the growing economic prosperity. This ideology was one of the Tories key focuses since they came back into power in the post war elections of 1951 and Macmillan did a sterling job in continuing the great work by creating what was known as the “age of affluence” allowing Britain to shine through as one of the World’s major economic powers. Bolstered by an improvement of world trade in the later 1950s, which enabled Britain to import about 29% more goods than it had in 1951 for the name number of exports proved that Britain was truly changing for the good. This massive economic growth also had a positive effect on the citizens who saw their average weekly wage double since 1951. The increase in real wages saw an augmented national purchase of goods such as TVs, motorbikes and cars. This sudden and vast economic recovery was harmful to Labour’s electoral campaign. With the working classes able to afford considerably more under Conservative rule due to the mass economic prosperity left Labour without a message or a receptive audience as the former traditional Labour voters were now middle-class conservatives. I think the age of the economic prosperity proving “life was better” with the conservatives was the most paramount factor that contributed to their victory.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the period of 1945-1970 was seen as an era of electoral stability, partially due to the stability of the voting patterns and the strong party identification. Thus the party identification model was supported by this period as partisan alignment, which is the long term manifestation of beliefs and loyalties was prominent in deterring the way the electorate voted. Supported by Punnet in 1971 was believed “for most people voting behaviour is habitual and ingrained”. Also, it was noted because of the dominance of the two main parties; Labour and Conservative whom gained on average 90% of the vote in the general elections. The sociological theory was identifiable in this period, which supported the idea of class alignment as people had a strong association of membership to a social class with the support of a political party. Pulzer stated in 1967 “the middle class had a tendency to vote Conservative and the working class had a tendency to vote Labour”. Although, short term factors such as the election campaign has significance as the elections were won by winning over the “floating voters” in important constituencies. These are all long-term factors that seemed to shape voting behaviour most extensively, however since this period the dominance has been reversed.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The belief that a person’s fate can be closely attributed to his or her own efforts is…

    • 1444 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia is a modern multifaceted society, with many distinct demographics each with their own interests. In such a diverse society, it is impossible to expect complete harmony amongst every demographic, but ideally co-existence of all groups in a détente can be achieved through mutual recognition and communication. However, increasingly common social conflict, volatile relations and polarisation of demographics in Australian society is demonstrating a widening of divisions between communities, parties and ideologies in ‘The Lucky Country’. CLASS Australian society, quite distinct from it’s British heritage, is no longer a society that is primarily drawn along class lines. Where in the past class was one of the most significant issues in the…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * An individual’s ‘membership’ of the upper, middle, or lower class reflected their own economic role in society & their opportunities…

    • 2213 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the years of 1945-1970 social class dominantly shaped the voting behaviour of individuals. Whilst there has been a decline in prominence of class voting: Labour remains the most popular working class party and Conservatives perform best among middle-class voters. Social classes are defined by economic and social status, i.e. working class typically consists of blue-collar workers, and in the past a strong link existed between voting behaviour and social class. This link existed due to entrenched ideals within social classes and lack of upward social mobility, meaning stable, long-term relationships would form to a particular party that best reflected the interests of an individual’s socio economic group, i.e AB social classes were seemingly intertwined with the fabric of the Conservative party. This party identification, or partisan, led to 64% of the vote in the mid 1960’s compromising of B support for Conservatives and C1/2 support for Labour. Yet since the 1970’s there has been both class and partisan dealignment. This can be accredited to changes in employment patterns, educational opportunities and rising standards of living. This means that the core vote of the two main parties is reduced and there are more floating voters, who are sans allegiance or attachment to any political party, less than 40% of voters say they have a strong attachment to any party compared with 90% in post-war Britain. To compliment this, albeit Labour was founded upon a commitment to a class, in 1997 New Labour made significant gains across the middle-class…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Macmillan's "never had it so good" speech rang true for many people, who used it as a way to realise that they indeed hadn't been so well-off before, and would be persuaded by that to continue voting for the Conservatives. helping them to dominate elections. Another factor which links to the lifestyle improvements was the greater availability of credit, which led to more people being able to afford mod cons and luxury items. There was a consumer boom during this time, when more people than ever before were able to buy items they previously couldn't afford thanks to the availability of credit; meaning they could pay for an item over a long period of time in small sums. People had not experienced this before and would have seen it as something that was much better than what they had during the Labour…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    While the Labour party has always adapted their agenda to the working class the Conservatives try to come across as party that does not focus on a specific class, religion or ethnicity but on terms that relate to everybody like ‘the nation’ or ‘the people’. A conservative party can do this, because their name does not, like Labour or Liberalism, imply a certain ideology. The core of Conservatism is to focus on tradition and protects the existing structure of order (Huntington,1957, p. 455). Certain changes in the 60s contributed to this, the working class was shrinking and the manual workers felt less connected by just class with the Labour. You could therefore say there was a shift from class voting to valence voting, which meant that people were less likely to vote according to their class, but more likely to vote what they believed would give the most prosperity (Turner, 2003, p. 190). This does not mean that people will automatically vote Conservative, but it does help the Conservatives because workers are less likely to vote automatically vote…

    • 2456 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to analyse Australia’s class system, it is important to define the key terms. Social construction is a phenomenon that is constructed (or invented) by members of a particular culture or society (Arvantiakis, 2009). Class “is a division in society of a group of people who have similar social and economic status” (Marx, 1847). Arvantiakis defines social status as relying on a person’s social background including where they live, what school they attend, their occupation and who they socialise with (2009). In this way, we can define class as a division in our society determined by wealth and social aspects. In 1991 Baxter, Emmison and Western defined four types of classes: lower class, working class, middle class and the upper class. Weber’s theory, which was says that “there is more than four types of class” is closer to Australia class structure. Today Australia has more than four types of…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DD102

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The identity of ‘class’ is often called the ‘unspeakable identity’. The reason for this may be that class refers to inequalities based on a small group of people that occupy a greater position within society. Class identity can therefore be defined as ‘a group or collective identity that links economic inequality and social differences, including superior or inferior status and differences of family background and lifestyle’ (Open University, 2015). Inequalities of class are part of British social history with famous theorist Karl Marx being one of the first social scientists to focus on social class. According to Marx there are two classes of people within society, these being the bourgeoisie and the proletariats, or in other words the employers and the workers.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The social structure of Britain has been highly influenced by the concept of social class. In sociology, the term ‘social class’ is most often used to refer to the primary system of social stratification found in modern capitalist societies. Social stratification refers to ‘the presence [in society] of distinct social groups which are ranked one above the other in terms of factors such as prestige and wealth’.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Early 20th Century

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    * An individual’s ‘membership’ of the upper, lower or middle class reflected her or his economic role within society.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays