Preview

Explain How Far The Sources Support Jewish Measures In 1933-1939

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1231 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain How Far The Sources Support Jewish Measures In 1933-1939
Use your own knowledge to assess how far the sources support the interpretation that most Germans ACTIVELY supported anti-Jewish measures in 1933-1939. [70]

Through 1933 to 1939, all these sources suggest that there was and was not active support during this time period against the Jews.

Firstly, there are 3 main sources which all show that yes, there was active support; these sources are A, B and D. But without ruling them all out, I believe that source C does show some active support.

If you look at source A, you can see it was a secret report by a Socialist Party agent. They were writing a report of what they could see about how the Jews were being treated and if any action was being taken. The Socialist writing this report has
…show more content…
Source B is by Josef Goebbels, who was a big Nazi and chief of propaganda. Straight away you will know that this source will be biased as it was written by a high profile Nazi who was very close to Hitler. In the source Goebbels says that Kristallnacht was the fault of the German population but from my own knowledge I know that most of the Germans involved in the attacks on the Jews were SA and SS men who were undercover to look like any other German and even though these men were undercover, other Germans still mixed in with them and ‘actively’ supported anti-Jewish measures. Also from my own knowledge I know that Kristallnacht partially happened because Goebbels heard that many non-Jewish Germans were still buying from Jews and were not following orders so Kristallnacht was set up, but in disguise, for people to think it was the German population doing it. Goebbels even says in his press statement, which happened the day after Kristallnacht occurred, ‘The whole population is now firmly asked to abstain from all further action of whatever nature against the Jews’ That shows you that Goebbels was trying to trick people into thinking that it was just the German population but with full knowing it was SS and SA men …show more content…
They all link together because they all say that Germans were still interacting with Jews, buying from Jewish shops etc; it was still happening even though the Nazis said for it not to happen. All sources are also able to show the other side, that people were being ‘actively’ supporting the anti-Jewish measures, some are represented in source B with Kristallnacht because some Germans did take part, also preaching in source C with the lady from the League of German Maidens. In source A and D, they both say similar things in how some people were still talking to the Jews and interacting with them even though told not to by the Nazis, some still did it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During 1938 Germany saw massive growth in their quest to build an empire, also their domestic preparations for war was fast-tracked. The restriction on Jews also increased dramatically through violence and aggression. Due to the rapid expansion, Holocaust Historians have labeled this year as the “Crucial Year”. There are three events that occurred for 1938 to be labeled the “crucial year”. The events that occurred in order are The Anschluss, The Evian Conference and the November Pogrom. These three events can be seen as the build-up to the eventual “Final Solution”.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bahr's Testimonies

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    The “Testimonies of SS Men” provides further examples that the Nazi regime shaped the perpetration of the Holocaust, not simply willing individuals. For example, observe Bahr’s testimony. Bahr was an SS officer responsible for gassing victims in a concentration camp. The counsel asks Bahr how long the victims took to die, how long it took to gas them, and why he killed. Bahr simply responds that he does not know; he just obeyed orders (Testimonies, 2). When pressed further about why he gassed people, Bahr responded that he “only had orders to pour the gas in” and did not know anything else about it (Testimonies, 2). Bahr’s testimony implies that he distanced himself from the victims. This ordinary man does not appear to have such animosity…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the two readings, I read about all of the laws and legislative acts that led to Hitler’s horrid decision of The Final Solution. These laws deprived the Jews from their homes and culture. They were forced to stop speaking German. They were also forced to dispose of any German books that they had. Instead of reading German books, they were forced to pay for a series of books, that discriminated Jews and “taught” them about Jewish corruption and conspiracies.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kristallnacht Paper

    • 1196 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the introduction to Alan E. Steinweis’ book Kristallnacht 1938, he argues that the German citizens attacking Jewish synagogues, businesses, homes, properties and the Jewish people themselves on November 9th, 1938 is important to understand the perspective of German Society and it’s role in the prosecution of Jews perpetrated by the Nazis. It further suggests that the involvement of Germans in the attacks was far more wide spread than just a small group of Nazi and Nazi sympathizers. It included not just German military officers and personnel, but also workers, teenagers and even children. Kristallnacht 1938 is different than other books and publications on the subject of the events that occurred in Germany in November 1938. Its primary focus is more on the individuals committing the attacks rather than the Jewish victims. It also argues against some of the prevailing theories noted in other works about the Kristallnacht.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pamphlet Targets Jews

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Topic: - Why do think the pamphlet targets Jews as enemies of the German people?…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War II remains a point of emphasis for historians to continue research and put together arguments on the specifics behind the events. In Nazi Germany and the Jews, Vol. 1: The Years of Persecution 1933-1939 (New York: HarperCollins, 1997), Saul Friedlander’s overarching explanation for anti-Jewish persecution under Nazi rule from 1933-1939 was an integration and combination of the Adolf Hitler’s, and other Nazi leaders, extreme radical ideology and tactical political decisions within the German borders. I will illustrate how Friedlander uses three instances to highlight the anti-Jewish persecution through the passage of different sets of laws thats link to his overarching explanation together. The first being the Nazi Party being able…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the first world war, Germany was almost at breaking point with the ramifications it was subject to after signing the treaty of Versailles. By the 1930s Germany, along with the whole of Europe, had been forced in a state of economic crisis as a result of the Wall Street Crash. This caused hyper inflation, widespread unemployment and poverty across the whole of Germany. The economic crisis was adding fuel to the flames of the already present anti-Semitic bonfire. A scapegoat had to be found and the Jewish-Germans were chosen. At the time of the Nazi takeover in 1933, the Jewish religion made up about 0.8% of the German population and the historian Daniel J. Goldhagen in his book ‘Hitler's Willing Executioners’ preposes that the remaining majority of Germans and Austrians knew and approved of the extermination of the Jewish race and that most would have actively participated in it had they been asked to do so. Goldhagen argues that one person cannot be responsible for the wrongdoings of a whole country and that the German people…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Germany the economy was not going well and they needed somebody to blame. The chose group to get the blame were the Jews. Somehow it was all their fault and they began to be punished. One German Jew was not happy about this and killed a German embassy. The consequence of this was Kristallnacht or the night of broken glass.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, Nazis hatred for the Jews was unrelated from many other people that also hated the Jewish race. The Nazis were distinct from other religions they had the thoughts that changed this whole world.…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This shows that anti semitism had already been occurring before the Holocaust. The website also states “a racist-biological anti-Semitism was developed, where the Jews were perceived as a ‘deformity on the body politic” ("The reasons for the Holocaust"). as a result of this Jews were labeled genetically inferior. The present hate towards the Jews was partly responsible for the tragic events of the Holocaust.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although an overall unexceptional German citizen, Hitler did have the ability to appeal to the German people and influence their thoughts and perception of his rampant anti-Semitism. When brought to power in 1932, the German people were well aware of the Nazi party’s anti-Semitic inclinations. They had hoped for moderation, but instead experienced excessive anti-Semitic policy. The persecution of the Jews at the hand of Hitler occurred inconsistently over the pre-WWII era. Hitler stated early on that one goal of his being in power was to address the “Jewish problem”.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first areas that we look at that were prevalent and were used to lay the foundation during the holocaust were those of racism, prejudice, and anti-Semitism. Racism can be defined as a “prejudice and discrimination on a basis of race”, and prejudice can be defined as an “attitude or prejudging, usually in a negative way” (Henslin, J., 2014). Finally anti-Semitism is a “prejudice, discrimination, and persecution directed against the Jews” (Henslin, J., 2014). The leaders of the Nazi party used all of these elements (racism, prejudice, and anti-Semitism) in the 1930’s to come to power by uniting the German people in a common cause and that was to purge Germany and ultimately the world of what was keeping Germany from being great and that was seen as the Jewish…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source B is a secret report prepared by the Nazi Party Supreme Court after the events of Kristallnacht. This source states that the German people were to blame for Kristallnacht in a ‘spontaneous’ attack on Jewish homes. As this report was prepared and published by the Nazis it is likely that they may have twisted the truth and pushed the blame onto the people to save themselves from blame. The fact that the report was published after the events of Kristallnacht further supports the sources unreliability as it seems as a cover up. Also as the source suggests that ‘such demonstrations were not to be organized by the party, but neither were they to be discouraged if they started spontaneously’, suggests the fact that the Nazis did not mind any spontaneous attacks showing their hatred for…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Holocaust History Mystery

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This text evidence shows that a holocaust survior has a very detailed memory about the actually happened in this event. While also giving accurate historic detail. She was a survivor and actual experienced it. This is a primary source from her.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Spirit of the Blitz

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The reliability of a source is one way of suggesting whether or not it is accurate. Rep 1 is written by a history graduate and has been published in an academic journal. This makes it seem reliable as it would have had to be fact checked, however the author can give an inaccurate impression by selectively choosing sources that back up his point of view. It is also biased as it gives very little information on alternative points of view and there is little discussion to reach a conclusion, this is likely to be because the author was taken a more controversial stance. Rep 2 is the least reliable of the sources, this is because it is not supposed to be factual so it is unsure how much of the information it presents is based on facts, this is mainly due to the purpose of Rep 2 being to entertain rather than to inform meaning they can be more lenient with the truth to make a more exciting and captivating story. It could be argued that Rep 3 presents a more balanced argument, it says good and bad things; “there was widespread fear” suggesting that people may not have always maintained a very stoical attitude but also “many people continued to turn up for work” suggesting that many things did carry on as normal. However there is a lack of information in Rep 3 due to it being so short and this puts limitations on the amount you can draw from it about civilian’s reactions to the Blitz.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays