Preview

Explain how and why the North won war by 1865

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain how and why the North won war by 1865
Research Paper: "Explain how and why the North won war by 1865." 1

Explain how and why the North won war by 1865
By,
Janice Lopez
History 1302
Mr. Otter
April 11, 2013

Research Paper: "Explain how and why the North won war by 1865." 2

Abstract
My research topic for this essay is explain how and why the North won war by 1865. In this essay I will be explaining the various reasons as to why the South surrendered to the North and how it all happened. This war took place from 1861 to 1865 and is ranked as the most deadliest war in American history. The Union or Northern States won the war against the South or the Confederacy. Instead of looking at causes or consequences, in this essay I will go into the reasons as to why did the North win the Civil War.

Research Paper: "Explain how and why the North won war by 1865." 3

The American South, though raised in military tradition, was to be no match North in the coming Civil War. The manpower on the Union side was much larger and outnumbered the Confederate army strength. The lack of emphasis on manufacturing and commercial interest, the South surrendered to the North their ability to to fight independently. It wasn't the Northern troops nor generals that won the Civil War, but their guns and equipment. From the very first start of the war, the Union had various advantages. "The North had large amounts of just about everything that the South did not, boasting resources that the confedaracy had even no means of attaining." (Brinkley, 1991). The Union had large amounts of land available for growing food crops which served for providing food for its hungry soldiers and money for the growing industries. The South, on the other hand, devoted most of their land to its main cash crop: cotton. Raw materials were almost entirely concentrated in Northern mines and refining
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    his 14
    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages

    his 14

    "The South did not lose the Civil War; the North won the conflict." Many consider the civil war to be a conflict over states rights and big government. Slavery was a major social issue that many Christians felt was wrong, but it was only part of the equation. The production of the south was growing larger than that of the north due to their fertile land and slavery. Southern merchants began to trade with the British and French through Charlestown, SC cutting out the merchants of New York. This was not acceptable to the North, who used slavery as a reason for aggression after the South seceded.…

    • 906 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FRQ APUSH North vs. South
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FRQ APUSH North vs. South

    Economically, the South had one relied resource and one only: cotton. It was the root of their profits, their lives, their surroundings. Despite the white majority of the 1860’s not being a part of the planter aristocracy, it was still their personal American Dream: to own slaves on a plantation with a pretty wife and white kids. The Southern economy depended primarily on the production and working of slaves, as the cheap labor force. On the industrial hand, the North was all about hard work and…equal rights, but mostly hard work. Their primary focus for economic gain was industry. Railroads, telegraphs, machines…oh my! The North also had the advantage of economic stability from the California Gold Rush which aided them to flourish dramatically, though plummeted during the Panic of 1857, which negatively affected the North due to the inflation caused by the gold. Once California was accepted into the Union (as a free state), its abundance of gold deposits held the North on its high horse before the reoccurring panics.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis: Why The North Won The Civil War
    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis: Why The North Won The Civil War

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.
    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why the North Won the Civil War by David Donald: Reflection on the economic, military, diplomatic, political, and social reasons the South lost.

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Vs South's Industrial Economy Analysis
    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil War Vs South's Industrial Economy Analysis

    3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyze The Political Differences Between The North And South During The Civil War
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analyze The Political Differences Between The North And South During The Civil War

    The Northern soil was in favor of small farms and less agriculture than the South, but industry flourished throughout the North due to an abundance of natural resources (North and South). With no nearby slave trading companies either; the north was more inclined to promote free-labor. On the other hand, the Southern warm climate and soil favored large plantations to grow crops such as tobacco and cotton that required a lot of manpower to produce (North and South). Also, the slave trade was very ample around the Southern states. With places such as the West Indies harboring many slave trading companies the Southern people could obtain slaves easily to work their expansive farms and plantations.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The South Lose The Civil War Analysis
    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Did The South Lose The Civil War Analysis

    There are constant debates on why did the South lose the Civil War. The Civil War ended 150 years ago but that has not affected historians to question the outcome of the war for the Confederacy. According to Gary Gallagher, many historians work backward starting from Appomattox to explain the failure of the war. He continues by stating that those historians claim the reasoning for the failure was caused by the lack will to win the war by the Confederates. Gary Gallagher disagrees with these methods historians use. Gary Gallagher believes that the best way to understand why the Confederates lost the Civil War takes a different approach. This is Gary W. Gallagher’s thesis in his The Confederate War is “Why did so many Confederates fight for so long? Until this question receives the detailed attention long accorded the first, the history of the Confederacy will remain imperfectly understood” (17).…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did The South Win The Civil War
    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did The South Win The Civil War

    The Civil war, which began in 1861, came to an end on May 13th,1865, and the Union claimed the victory. But the South were victorious in many of the earlier battles of the war, but at first they had a strong military leadership. The South’s defeat was due to poor strategy in the military and the appointment of weak generals, many people also believe that political leadership, foreign support, the supply of the army and war economics were reasons they didn’t win.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Why Did The North Win The Civil War
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Why Did The North Win The Civil War

    The North took victory in the civil war against the South. The North had several of advantages when it came to defeating the other side.The blockade. As the war progressed the blockade of Southern ports slowly became more effective, closing the ports and thus cutting off the vital supplies needed to fight the war. This includes medicine. The South had to rely on Europe even more so than the North for supplies with which to fight the war so by eliminating more and more ports into which the supplies could come into the Confederacy the North slowly deprived the South of it's ability to properly fight. By the end of the war many Confederate soldiers didn't have the ammo, food, or even effective weapons required to campaign with. Attrition. The Union had more men…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why The South Lost the Civil War
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why The South Lost the Civil War

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Push West
    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Do People Push West

    Why and how the North have the advantage in the Civil War? The North had an advantage over the South in many fields, including its population, industrial and agricultural capacity, and transportation network. Half of the men of military age fought for the Union in the North, around 2.1 million were supplemented by Irish, German immigrants and African Americans who most of them were ex-slaves from the South. In the South, 90 percent of the men eligible to fight and fought for the Confederacy in the South were around 900000.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did The North Win The Civil War
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Did The North Win The Civil War

    In order to win the war, the Union had to think smart and play it to their advantage. In the book The Civil War: A Visual History, author John E. Stanchak declared, “During the 19th century, the new era of rail and steam that marked the Industrial Revolution was centered in the Northern states, and a summary of economics and human resources shows their advantages” (Stanchak 54). The North had a lot of railroads which helped them travel faster. They also had more money and organizations than the South. These advantages boosted them further into victory.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the Civil War
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why the South Lost the Civil War

    When the Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee surrendered to the Union Army General, Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865, many considered the Civil War to be over. The fact that the North was victorious over the South was accepted and the process of reconstruction began in America. It was never openly discussed on why the North defeated the South. However, the question began to slowly arise over time on why the South lost the Civil War. Many historians have become interested in this question and many reasons have been given on why the South lost the Civil War. Lack of manpower, shortages of supplies, and inferior leadership and government were the three main reasons on why the South was defeated in the Civil War.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Food Affect The Civil War
    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Does Food Affect The Civil War

    In the end the south actually had several and harsh problems with their food supply. As recorded it cites,”Without Civil War food and water an army soon disintegrates into nothing more than a lot of starving people with no energy or will to fight.” and described in my first paragraph no man will survive on that field not being fed. “Confederate soldiers usually didn’t receive much food at all especially as the war dragged on.” showing that these men were dieing of starvation and at the point of surrendering. Now food isn't the exact way to win a war, but it may be the way the confederates lost. The Confederates completely forgot one thing they sent so many men to war that none were home to fix the garden/ plantation. Remember this and if they had been home 6 percent owned slaves at the time and what was their cash crop at that time? Their cash crop was cotton which tore the soil into crap(idk what to say besides that). So if they had to change they would have to first relocate their field, plant the seeds, wait for it to grow and not much men where there to do this labor because both the union and the south resorted to a draft for more men to battle for their side. The South not only were stuck inside there territory…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis
    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    The Union had a much more developed and strong government and various technological advantages over the Confederacy. For example, the North had over triple the amount of factories that the South had, six times the workers in those factories, and over double the railroad mileage compared to the South (Source 5). Contextually, these advantages in manpower and technology in the North were long term consequences of the North taking advantage of advancements in technology and having a solidified government in comparison to the South, which stuck with a plantation model based on growing cotton and had little to no government after their secession from the Union. The North’s dominance over technology and manpower gave them a more stable base of resources going into the war than the South, which basically only had cotton and not enough food or manpower. The Union’s use of their technological power gave them the ability to win battles by a landslide and leave cities as large as Atlanta, Georgia completely leveled in the wake of military advancements such as General Sherman’s March to the Sea (Source 7). The photo of the destruction left by the Union army shows the capability of the technology that they possessed in comparison to the Confederacy, and how organized the Union army was because of their strong leadership. Contrastingly, Confederate leadership was…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics