Preview

Examples Of Utilitarianism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
613 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Utilitarianism
1. From a utilitarian point of view, we could generally say that it is permissible to test on living creatures, because by finding a cure for pancreatic cancer we would help a large amount of people, while only hurting a few in the research process. According to Singer’s concept of speciesism, there is no significant difference between the human and the chimpanzee that we should take into account in making this decision. It doesn’t matter what species you belong to, and just because the human belongs to our race we shouldn’t value his life higher or give him any priority. Having that said and therefore viewing the human and the chimpanzee as equals in their moral worth, a utilitarian would choose to research on the human, because it would produce less pain. The chimpanzee is completely healthy and has his whole life to live, with no reason for any significant pain or an early death other than by natural causes. The human on the other side, since being brain-dead, will be in a vegetative state forever until his death, and can’t experience any pain, because he is completely unconscious. For the human, nothing would change, he wouldn’t know what would happen to him and he would miss out on nothing. We can therefore conclude that in a utilitarian view, …show more content…
I believe animals do have the moral right not to be tortured by us for our own interest. I don’t see the difference why we shouldn’t experiment on humans because it is unethical, but to it on animals should be fine. Following utilitarian argumentation, it would be okay to make animals suffer if there is a greater good that is achieved, for example human nutrition or medical achievements. However, animals don’t realize what is happening to them when they have to suffer and they will never experience the good that comes out of it. It would even be more logical to instead do research on humans, since they understand what they are sacrificing themselves for, instead of being confused as to why they re treated that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Along the years, chimps are the most used animal in world of science apart from other animals such as rabbits, mice and guinea pig for research purpose. In recent years, the general public, lawmakers and scientists have expressed increasing discomfort over the use of chimpanzees in biomedical research. Today it would be considered morally unacceptable to carry out many of the experiments that were done on them in the recent past. Some of the procedures that made chimps suffer are removed or destroyed portions of their brains to test brain function, killed them and removed their organs to be used for human transplants, exposed them to huge doses of radiation, castrated and removed their pituitary glands, followed by hormone analysis and placed electrodes…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story “The Plea for the Chimpanzees” by Jane Goodall, Jane writes of a personal experience on her visit to a testing center where they use various primates to test products, one being chimpanzees. She was very upset with what she had seen during her visit. Chimpanzees were being treated horribly during and after being tested. Their living conditions were not what she would have thought them to be. They were quite worse. They had very little a social life with other chimpanzees or even humans. I think if we are going to use chimps to test products or inject them with our major diseases, then the least we can do is give back a little bit of freedom to run and play in a closed, safe environment and offer some compassion and love to these animals who are helping us find cures for the…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals should have the right to decide if they want to collaborate in experiments. In Ed Young’s article, “Of Primates and Personhood”, he explains that, “the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for apes”. This quote informs us that apes should be more than just property. Some may argue that experimentation is beneficial to humans because it helps us decide what kinds of products are safe for human use. However, the experimentation on apes sometimes leads to their death.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They Say I Say Ch5, 1

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I agree that animal testing isn’t just where animals are being tortured, because my experience with research has showed that, in very rare cases animals are tortured, it’s very hard for a scientist to get funding for that type of experiment, as well as all the certificates they need to make it happen in the first place.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APA Code Of Ethics Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Experimentations on animals can cause various types of pains. In the APA code of ethics, it states that animals should be treated as humanely as possible, unless there is no other way (Bayard, 229). However, this goal should be justified by the “prospective scientific. Educational, or applied value” (Bayard, 229).There is a distinction made between humans and animals when humans are registered under the animal domaine. Homo sapiens are not any better than any other species, and it is not fair, that the other species have to suffer at the expense of potentially benefitting another species.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under utilitarianism, there are Act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism which these two have a bit differences. For rule utilitarians, the rightness of a standard is dictated by the measure of good it realizes when taken after. Conversely, act utilitarians judge a demonstration as far as the outcomes of that demonstration alone. Act utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics which expresses that a man's demonstration is ethically right if and only if the event that creates at any rate as much satisfaction as some other demonstration that the individual could perform around then. For example, you go in to save someone who is choking and they end up suffocated, getting worse.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most debated ethical issues is Animal Rights. Animals are so much a part of our lives and world that it is impossible to ignore the ethical issues we are faced with pertaining to the treatment of animals. What is difficult about these issues is that although animals have many similar attributes as humans they lack the developed brain function that humans have. Although many animals can feel pain, experience happiness, even form attachment, they are not able to speak for themselves and so humans take charge of their fate. A highly debated topic within the focus of Animal Rights is the morality of Animal Experimentation and under what circumstances, if…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To begin with, why should we make animals suffer before killing them? In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin states “And for the thousands of animals subjected each year to painful laboratory experiments? Or the millions of domestic animals…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel getting chemicals dropped into your eyes and on your skin, being confined into a small cell waiting to be tortured? Now why is it fair to do this to animals? There are so many reasons why animals should not be used for scientific research. Animal testing is unethical, and completely immoral. Not to mention it is unnecessary and there are many newly developed options that avoid animal cruelty. Additionally, animal testing has been proven to be ineffective and inaccurate.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It is not morally acceptable for scientists to use live animals in research for medicine that can be used to cure humans. Today we continue to use animals in experiments to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals and to ensure the safety of new medical treatments. Now that we know the purpose of animal testing, is it really worth killing millions of innocent animals? This practice is morally wrong and inconsiderate of us for letting this happen. People should stop using animals as experiment subjects and utilize the advance technology that we have now. This is happening because we are letting it happen! We have to start by educating others on this issue because the lack of knowledge on animal testing is why people…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal experimentation is not only cruel, but expensive as well. Thankfully, there are accurate, cheaper and quicker alternatives. First, there are the In vitro tests which are used to diagnose disease or health of patients using the patient's blood sample or body tissue. Another is microdosing, where humans are given low quantities of a product to test the effects on the body, without affecting the whole body system.There are also many computerized patient-drug databases, virtual drug trials, and stem cell and genetic testing methods. The United States alone spends about $16 billion dollars every year, coming from taxpayers, for animal experimentation. Just think about how much money the US could save if it abolished animal testing as a whole. The US has been in debt and in a depression for years, yet it continues to throw money down the toilet just to torture and kill animals. Animals are NOT the only way to test…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong 1

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Millions of animals are used every year for a wide variety of scientific and medical purposes. Some of this scientific research is to learn about and improve the welfare of animals, but most of the animal experiments are unfortunately conducted for human benefits. An estimated eight million animals are used in painful experiments, which can range from getting pricked with a needle to more severe experiments, and ten percent of these animals do not receive painkillers. Then after all of the pain that they had been put through, some of them are euthanized when scientists are no longer in need of experimenting on them. Animal rights advocates want government agencies to impose heavy restrictions on animal research, but their opposition of painful animal experimentation is matched by the growing concern that these restrictions would pose a threat to scientific progress. Although there has been scientific progress from this, animal testing is still cruel, immoral, and unnecessary because all animals, like humans, have value and are worthy of being treated with respect.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They have the ability to respond to the provocations in their environments and to instinctively take actions that are relevant to their survival, but they are not rational (Allen, 2010). Possums, for example, play dead when they sense a predator, and squids spurt ink to make themselves invisible from their enemies. Animals have locomotive skills to live and reproduce, but not the human rationality to think and feel like humans do. So the question is, for scientific experiments that require the use of a living creature, would it be more ethical to sacrifice a person so that the animals would be spared? Or, would the world be a better place to let people and a larger population of animals die in diseases that can otherwise be cured or prevented through animal testing? The welfare of all human beings should be given importance above all, and the animals are a means to make it possible. Then again, people also have the responsibility to replenish and protect these living creatures that provide them their needs. People may use the animals for scientific research, but they should also fulfill their duty to use methods that are least harmful to these creatures. Scientific research is not all about the use of animals. In fact, animals are only used for areas of research where no other techniques can give an answer. The animals used for research are also those that are not in danger of being extinct. For instance, the Hastings Center experiments on a species of monkey that is widespread in Africa to develop new treatments for Parkinson disease (Redmond, 2016). Researchers are also looking for ways to develop better communication channels to prevent the same experiments from being done in multiple facilities. More human techniques are also studied in an attempt to comply with the demands of animal welfare advocacy…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Jim Motavalli questions in the article “Rights from Wrongs”, “Does a pig packed in a tiny factory cage waiting to be killed have any rights in America? And what about the chimpanzee, which shares 99% of its active DNA with humans (Motavalli 26)?” Scientists are permanently harming these animals and don’t even mind. Scientists must realize that these chimpanzees and other primates may be close to us in DNA, however we should not be using them in this way that could permanently injure them. “In the U.S. more than 100 million animals are tortured due to animal experimentation practices- classified as any testing that is likely to induce pain or suffering among creatures (Yashiki n.p.).” This pain could not only hurt them physically but also emotionally, no animal is going to want to live after being abused like the way they are in labs. Jen Yashiki claims in her article “Animals Do Not Need to be Harmed for Better Products” that some scientists have been studying ways to use human tissues instead of closely related animals for more accurate tests (Yashiki n.p.). There are better things to solve the animal testing problem then hurting innocent creatures permanently.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays