Preview

Examples Of The Perils Of Passive Resistance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of The Perils Of Passive Resistance
Sophia Tiongko CAL 103 D4 12 October 2023 Professor Ogden Essay 2 Final Draft The Perils of Passive Resistance When a body of people comes into power, there is always a risk that those who compose that body will abuse their power for personal gain and at the expense of the people they govern. Consequently, victims of this ugly facet of human nature are left to decide between two main methods of response: violent retaliation or amicable appeals to the government. Aggression is at times viewed as a more impactful, and time-effective approach, especially when the atrocities committed by a tyrannical government are so horrific, they justify violent means. On the other hand, a peaceful response has a clear ethical advantage and lacks the risk of chaos and …show more content…
Therefore, the lack of visibility renders a passive resistance movement useless and aids the unjust government by purporting a narrative that their actions are justified. Examples of successful passive resistance movements of the past have been defined by the sacrifices of safety and security made by their respective leaders. Martin Luther King Jr., for example, would not have been able to facilitate the passage of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed discrimination in areas like voting and employment, had he not made himself the public face of the movement. His great contribution to the livelihoods of black Americans ultimately cost him his life, as he was assassinated by openly racist James Earl Ray, who opposed his work. Those who take on the great feat of spearheading a passive resistance movement must be aware and accepting of the unavoidable risks they must assume. In his speech, Desmond Tutu describes Mandela’s impressively magnanimous treatment of those the leaders of apartheid who treated him so

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In the documentary _Eyes on the Prize_, John Lewis- an attendee of the 1960 Nashville Lunch Counter Sit-In, regales the use of nonviolence in their fight for racial equality, saying "We took our seats in a very orderly, peaceful fashion…We just sit there, and we continue to sit all day long... But for me, I 'll tell you; it was like being involved in a holy crusade. It became a badge of honor" (PBS). The Civil Rights Movement, which began in 1954, was so deeply impactful largely in part to the unusual nature of its participant 's actions against their opposition. Scarce physical tactics or retaliation was threatened against the white opposition on the black insurgent 's behalf in order to achieve what…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    GKE Task 2

    • 1554 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sohail, K. (2005). Prophets of violence, prophets of peace: Understanding the roots of contemporary political violence. [ebrary book]. Retrieved from https:lrps.wgu.edu/provision/17907583…

    • 1554 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King’s leadership resulted in one of the the greatest non-violent mass protests in the history of the western world. King represented a sense of hope and promise to the followers of the Civil Rights Movement. The most important aspect to understand in this debate is King’s non-violence. With many other African-American leaders, such as Malcolm X, taking a more aggressive, violent approach to change, King saw the potential in Ghandi’s peaceful protests. As Fairclough writes, “Few blacks believed that the city’s businessmen would have accepted desegregation but for the double pressure of the demonstrations and the economic boycott of downtown stores” (209). The only effective events in the Civil Rights movements were those that followed King’s system of non-violence. While Carson argues that rather than King’s presence, “the success of the black movement required the mobilization of black communities…”(219), this assertion is made under the assumption that a non-violent leader would organize the masses. Without King’s leadership, there may have been an violent uprising that only led to more tensions between the…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. spoke out against racism during the Civil Rights movement in order to fight for equal rights for every race and end discrimination against African Americans. During the African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954-1968), there were many acts of civil disobedience, which led to violence and even deaths of the protesters. There were also many nonviolent protests, such as sit-ins, marches, and speeches, to get people’s attention so that their voices would be heard and their desires fulfilled. Martin Luther King believed in the nonviolent approach to gain the rights he desired because in his opinion, it was the most powerful weapon against any enemy. In the midst of a nonviolent protest on August 28th, The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. makes a very memorable rhetorical appeal in front of millions of people for an end to discrimination against blacks and segregation of people with different skin tones.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The pursuit of racial equality after Word War 2 was a long and perilous journey. In the minds of most Americans, people of high influence or power were the vehicles that drove the civil rights movement forward from where it was started. Influential and popular characters like Martin Luther King, Thurgood Marshall, and Rosa Parks were constantly in the spotlight, for eliminating Jim Crow Laws, working towards desegregation of the education system, and standing for the rights for African Americans respectively. However, the success of the civil rights movement can mainly be attributed to the hard work, and dedication of the “unknown” masses of people rather than the Government/Public Figures. This is based upon the…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the pursuit of social justice and civil rights, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and Stokely Carmichael, sought to amend a flawed system. To accomplish this task, these men entered the armory and chose to wield nonviolence as their weapon. Their goal: to combat violence with nonviolence, to fight hate with love, and to spread equality through peace. In the end they succeeded. Violence breeds violence, hate breeds hate, it is an ineffective approach and an archaic mean to resolving societies issues. Malcolm X and Carmichael were both extreme individuals but that does not make them violent. They attacked social justice and civil rights passionately and assertively, not violently. The methods used and arguments made by Martin Luther King Jr. in Letter from Birmingham Jail, Malcolm X in The Ballot or the Bullet, and Stokely Carmichael in Black Power, demonstrate the potency of nonviolence. These men address three separate issues in each of their works. King discusses social issues in regards to the nation as a whole in his letter. Malcolm X speaks to the political equality of black individuals in African American communities. Carmichael discusses white supremacy and its oppression of African American citizens in their own community. Fighting with peace, protesting with nonviolence, is the most effective measure when pursuing social justice and civil rights. I will show how Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and Stokely Carmichael used passive methods and nonviolent means in conquering the issues they had at hand.…

    • 3564 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the movement was triggered by a series of random sit-ins, the civil rights leaders and the youths were able to strategize using nonviolence as a method of exposing the truth about segregation. By reacting peacefully to the violence they faced by the angry mob, people were moved to call for an end against racial…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1941, A. Philip Randolph, leader of the Negro American Labor Council, initiated a national demonstration by African-Americans in Washington, D.C. The demonstration never occurred, because President Roosevelt issued and congress approved the Executive Order 8802, implementing racial desegregation among armed forces. Although the movement never occurred; the planning for it, and the significance of the movement had a big impact on Black people in the United States during the second world war. The concept of non-violent protest was established through organizing this march. Non-violent protest was an important influence preparing for the Civil Rights and Black Liberation struggles of the 1950s and ‘60s.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1968, close to 50 years ago, Martin Luther King, Jr. was killed by an assassin's bullet. He had given us a decade of nonviolent protest and civil disobedience during the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. While the idea of nonviolent protest was still relatively new, MLK hadn’t invented it; he had been one of a few who pioneered the idea and made it popular. The theory of civil disobedience can be traced back to an essay by Henry David Thoreau by the same name. This theory was adopted and popularized by Leo Tolstoy, Mahatma Gandhi, and eventually, Martin Luther King, Jr.. In “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau said that if a law “requires you to be the agent of injustice to another,” you should break that law, rather than be unjust to another person.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is often said that, “Nonviolent” direct action seeks to create such as crisis and fosters such a tension that a community. Which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.” Martin Luther King Jr.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The march's success resulted in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, proving activism can cause changes. The March on Washington along with other Civil Rights Movement events impacted people to participate in ways of activism, and “Since then, numerous groups of varying political stripes, including poor people, women, environmentalists, gays and lesbians, black men, Christian men, and cancer patients, have attempted, none so successfully, to use the March on Washington as a model for delivering demands to the federal government” (Jones 4). The March on Washington has been the layout of other marches to protest ideas that relate to racism and other social issues. The success encourages activists and protests and speaks of hope of other successes. The March on Washington promoted activism in peaceful ways that carried into the modern-day world.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such a government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King JR. went to Birmingham to "engage in a nonviolent direct action program if such were deemed necessary"(2). Birmingham is one of the most segregated cities so Martin Luther King went there to try and help bring equality towards them. Although King's actions were peaceful and nonviolent, he still was sent to jail. Martin Luther King didn't even resist when he was arrested. King's resistance to the laws were not in any way negative, the cops and some people were the ones that made it negative. King explained that there are four basic steps to a nonviolent campaign, collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action. Throughout every step and every peaceful resistance they had, it made no difference. They figured it was time try direct action. Even though their direct action was peaceful, he was still sent to jail. When King said, "Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.", I thought he made a really good point. You could do any form of resistance and they wont hear you out.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Significant changes to society are difficult; a great change is usually brought about by a major event. Occasionally, changes can be brought upon peacefully; but most often the changes which are violent are more commonly known. The Civil Rights Movement used a variety of nonviolent methods; whereas what may have sparked this movement (The Attack on Pearl Harbor) was a brutal.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violent Revolutions

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence against violence is only the most logical way to expel overpowering executives. Government has used brutality to keep their citizens “in check” since the beginning of time. Violence is natural to humans. Humanity has always known this concept of cruelty and it is impossible to avoid. Karl Peter Heinzen was a notable author who wrote a pamphlet advocating violent revolutions. The pamphlet emphasized the use of violence to allow change in government. Avoiding the use of cruelty and barbarity will result in avoiding a future where real change is enabled everywhere in society (Heinzen 10). The reality is humanity is shaped by brute force. By avoiding violence, the citizens are avoiding a different and better future. Violent revolutions should be considered legitimate because totalitarian governments are allowed to get away with “legal” murder everyday. The inhabitants are just guarding themselves from the ferocious regimes. Karl Heinzen’s pamphlet also argues the legitimacy of violent revolutions. “It was my object to vindicate not only the aims of revolution, but also its means, including assassination and to render it as legitimate as the tyrants have done with their murder by war, their ‘legal’ murder, their murder by ‘court-martial’” (Heinzen 12). Violent governments have always used “legal” murder to control their citizens. The…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays