Preview

Examples Of The Golden Rule By J. S. Mill

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
264 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of The Golden Rule By J. S. Mill
J.S. Mill believes that one basic principle should govern our behavior. That basic principle is that our actions should maximize happiness for all, not just yourself. Happiness means the pleasure and the absence of pain. When Kant talks about pleasure, he does not mean physical pleasure such as sex or eating. Pleasure should be associated with intellectual and moral pleasures. An example of this principle is the Golden Rule. I have been aware of the Golden Rule ever since I started school and it has become a valued rule in today’s society. The Golden Rule means that you treat others how you would want them to treat you. I agree completely with the Golden Rule because no one wants to be treated like they are unequal in society. Everyone should

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mill separates pleasure into higher and lower as that he thinks some pleasure like higher is more for the soul and are long term and will benefit you as a person and the lower pleasures which are more material and offer short term pleasure but not the sort that lasts. He use the saying ‘Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfies; Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied‘ to show the differences between the two pleasures as that you can be a human dissatisfied which is better than being a pig who is satisfied as that you are may not be happy or content but you are doing good which is better than someone who is happy and content but doing bad.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How to Annotate

    • 579 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 579 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The principle I want to focus on is number four, this principle is that nonviolence is a willingness to accept violence if necessary, but never inflict it. I think principle number four is the most important because it is what Martin Luther King Jr. stood for in his peaceful protest and such. He stood for nonviolence and to never inflict violence back in his protests. I think that principle number four is about nonviolence and not inflicting it on anyone even if they inflict it toward you. I think this principle is important because it's what Martin Luther King stood for in his peaceful protest and is what he was known for, his peaceful and nonviolent protest.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays
    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A principle means an accepted or professed rule of action or conduct. My first main priciple is the welfare of the child is paramount most articles in the UNCRC are based along this. Article 3 states 'The best interests of the child must be a top priority in all actions…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Work Cited

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mill’s theory of higher pleasures states that when it comes down to pleasures and satisfaction, people tend to set these empirical grounds for these…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this general happiness for everyone’s well-being, a persons priority or rights can’t take a lead or be more important over the general happiness of everybody (chapter II, p.17). This agrees with Aristotle’s, that the political functioning in a society through virtuous character are to benefit the community. Mill argues against Aristotle by claiming that because having security is the definitive right that is deserved by all people through law, certain actions, such as torture, are just in order to ensure that a person has security (Chapter 5, p.54). With this being said Utilitarianism follows a concept that is focused on the general happiness of everyone in the community, but also the happiness that comes to them through security. Mill states that there are certain qualities that show justice and injustice, and some of these qualities are that it is unjust for a person to be deprived of their legal and moral rights, but it is just that everybody should get what they deserve. According to this, torture of a person, can be justified because it will overall give people assurance of security and happiness. But, it is also unjust because it violates a person’s moral and legal rights. This is where the General Happiness Principle comes into play. The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness, which is pain (Chapter 2, p. 7). Happiness is the absence of pain or freedom of pain, which is the only thing that should be desirable as an end and people will always choose the end that is overall more desirable in pleasure (Chapter 2, p. 8). Mill clearly states, “…laws and social arrangements should place the happiness or the interest of…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first chapter deals with how to handle people successfully. In this chapter it highlights one of the most important things you can do when dealing with people and their particular situation is to rationalize with them, meaning that to better understand were the person is coming from you must put yourself in their shoes. Every one can and will rationalize why they make the decisions they make. People like the infamous Al Capone never thought he was a bad person. He had rationalized the actions he took and the decisions he made. This is a good example to lead into the first principle, which is that no one should ever critize, complain, or condemn other people. Principe two suggests that you always give people or sincere appreciation. You shouldn't sit and think about your own individual accomplishments and successes, but compliment others on their successes. The most important thing that others can give is their genuine appreciation. That is the key to getting what you want, threatening people by force or harsh words, but to get others to do what you want is to give them what they want; appreciation for their deeds. Principle three explains that most people do not care what you want. They care mostly for themselves and are not really interested in what you want. The key is to expose them on how what you want will also benefit them; it establishes…

    • 2448 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An excerpt from Exploring Ethics, best exemplifies the comparison from Mill and Kant. Kant's ethical system concentrates exclusively on the reason for an action and does not take into account its results, Mill's system focuses only on consequences. Mill's explained "that this is the singularity is the basis in which you use to judge morality, with those being morally right being those that will manufacture the most happiness because in the end all humans seek happiness above everything else." He also argued that fame, money, and virtue could not replace happiness but could be used to obtain it. Mill’s believed that happiness is the guiding arch that drives…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I agree with John Stuart Mills argument that happiness is the only basic good. Mill argues that basic goods create the maximum amount of happiness; which follows the principle of utilitarianism. In an article comparing Mills view on utilitarianism, it states “happiness is linked to morality. For instance, in general, it backs up murder’s being wrong, lying, rights.”(Mesacc, n.d.). I agree with Mills argument more than Kants theory because in most cases, people want the greatest amount of happiness not only for themselves, but for their close ones as well. Good will according to Kant’s theories has no limitations. Back to the Anne Frank example, the greatest amount of happiness would have been Anne Frank and her close relatives and for the person opening the door not to tell the Nazis she was there. The Nazis were only there because it was their duty to restrain all Jewish people at training…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third principle is justice or fairness, and this means that when one has done goodness or badness that they are treated fairly and have justice. If someone has done something good that should be treated fairly and that person should have justice; which means, someone should reward or congratulate that person for doing something good. But if someone does wrong then they should still be treated fairly with justice. The United States follows this principle very closely, because when one does…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill is a utilitarian philosopher who lives by the Greatest Happiness Principle, in which there is a clear distinction between both lower and higher pleasures. Though thoroughly explained, one must also question the justification of these pleasures. Many of these beliefs leave the reader hanging on the edge, with further questions that need to be answered. What is the exact distinction between the lower and higher pleasures? And how are higher pleasures measured as most valuable? How clearly is Mill’s view of lower and higher pleasures justified?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays