Many people think that Socrates committed treason but he didn't. The reason how he didn't commit treason is because it is not his fault that the youth broke the rules. He also just told the young people to question everything, but it is not his fault that they went against the rules. The reason why it is not his fault is because he told them to question everything not break the rules. Socrates didn't actually commit treason, it was the young…
Socrates’ argument for Meletus, Anytus and Lycon. Meletus Youth Meletus, let me ask a question of you. Do you think a great deal of improvement of the youth? Tell me then, who is their improver; as you have taken the pains to discover their corrupter.…
Athenians live as the society tells them to live, and they follow their own traditions, customs, and morals of the rest of the people. Socrates has never forced Athenians to follow his teachings, on the contrary he lets them do it without getting anything in return. He states “And I cannot justly be held responsible for the good or bad conduct of these people, as I never promised to teach them anything.” (33a-b) He doesn’t directly influence society, he tries to make them aware of their lack of knowledge; it then becomes their responsibility to fill the void exposed by Socrates. Therefore, he believes they have not examined their own lives. Socrates believes an examined life is one that is reflective, where we examine actions on the basis of…
In "Crito," Plato uses Socrates as a tool to argue the point. Socrates is in jail for "preaching false gods" and "corrupting the youth" by causing them to doubt or disregard the wisdom of their…
He does this by saying that wicked people do harm to the people closest to them while good people do good to those closest to them. Meletus agrees with this which leads Socrates to the point that no person would willingly choose to live among the wicked as it would cause him harm. With this being the case Socrates argues that he cannot be validly charged with willingly corrupting the youth as it would only do he harm. And if he is corrupting the youth, he is not doing it willing. IF this is the case, there is no need for a trial and punishment. Socrates states that if he is unwillingly corrupting the youth, it is necessary to correct him rather than punish him. Socrates gives Meletus too options. Either he is not corrupting the youth (as that would cause him harm, or he is doing it unwillingly. Either way, neither option is a crime worth of death. With this argument, Socrates is able to invalidate the charge of corrupting the youth. It is clear by Socrates description of the wording of the charges that the charges are illogical and serve no basis for a…
Because of this, Confucius would have found Socrates guilty. The main reason why Confucius would have found Socrates guilty is because Socrates was causing the youths, assumed to be males who are old…
Is Socrates actually guilty of either of the crimes with which he is charged: impiety and corrupting the youth? Are these crimes dangerous for a political community? Is Socrates, in his Apology, fully persuasive that he and his way of life pose no threat to the city? (To answer these questions, you will need to ask yourself what is the foundation for Athenian or, indeed, any political society.)…
Socrates is arguing here that if he had indeed corrupted the youth and has been doing so for a while, the people who he had corrupted would likely have approached him in anger and in search of revenge. I believe that Socrates’ argument is valid and sound, is a great defense to his…
Socrates sticks to he is innocent and anyone that knows him knows he is telling the truth. The prosecutors will do anything to prove otherwise and encourage other people like maletus to think the accusation against Socrates is true. Socrates says, “what is the accusation which has given rise to the slander of me, in the fact has encouraged Melatus to proof this charge against me.”(1-2) Socrates knows they are encouraging the lie about him and want to prove him guilty. When Socrates says,“rise of the slander of me”(1-2) he is saying this accusation everyone is trying to say is true about him is…
Virtue, rather than being a teachable piece of knowledge, seems to be an innate understanding. Every person in the world, save perhaps psychopaths and sociopaths, naturally has a strong moral compass. An example that proves this idea is the innocence of children. I have never witnessed a child perform an action with solely malicious intent. Children always have some outside motivation for any hateful actions they perform, so they never do it only to hurt someone. At this point you might think that, yes, children do not do anything with only malicious purposes, but the fact remains that they continue to perform such actions. This is true, but honestly, how have children learned to do such hateful things? No child would consider cursing at anyone if they were angry, but since they observe others performing these actions, the children begin to develop the idea in their minds that doing so must relieve their suffering. It seems, then, that humans learn harmful…
Socrates, one of the greatest minds go Ancient Greece’s was no exception. As a sophist, Socrates was considered a teacher of the noble. Sophist of Greed taught young men ’arete’: excellence or virtue for a price. However, Socrates wasn’t a regular sophist, he never accepted any monetary reward for his ’teachings“ (b316,p813) and he never actually taught anything but rather trained minds to think. Socrates states at the trail that he doesn’t have any true knowledge and he believed that in order to have any true knowledge one must be able to produce a single, clear definition of a subject without any exclusions to the rule, something that he was never able believed that he couldn’t do.Rather than use he own opinions to teach his pupils what to think, Socrates used ”systematic questioning“ (b136p813) to help clear their own minds and reach their own conclusions just by thinking. A skill that they could carry forward, into their lives as Athenian citizens. With this in mind, it is nearly impossible for the Athenians government to find Socrates guilty of…
Socrates did not corrupt the youth. Socrates spread his ideas and teachings to the youths, which is perfectly legal. Every man is essentially his own person and Socrates was now being put on trial for the actions of other people, which is completely unjust. Its easy to see that this charge is a bogus creation of three men trying to make life a little easier around Athens. I am not buying into it and that is why for the charge of corrupting the youth Socrates is not guilty.…
“The prime movers in both of the anti-democratic movements were former pupils of Socrates, Alcibiades and Critias.” (Linder 2002) Though Socrates wasn’t intentionally trying to corrupt people with his philosophical ideas, he probably made…
The youth can be educated in many different ways, either by keeping them in the shadows, or exposing them to the light. this means that the future of the society can be either ruled by a person who is oblivious to the society's past, or by a person who has been fully exposed to the society's history. If a person is censored from education, then they love their life as a perfect world. this is best described when Socrates says that a Guardian should be a person who "must be gentle to their own people and harsh to the enemy." (375b-c). Socrates wants to educate these Guardians to be noble, righteous, and tentative to their every word, like a robot. He wants to educate them by making them obedient. He also believes that repressing…