Preview

Examples Of Moral Absolutism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Moral Absolutism
There are people in this world that believe that ethics are relative, but there are other people who believe that ethics are absolute too. For a person who believes ethics are truly relative, they evaluate acts as right or wrong based on their culture or the person. Ethical or moral relativism is the position in meta-ethics that morality is not universal, but that moral truths can be determined by factors relative to social, cultural, historical or personal circumstances. In the other hand, people who believe ethics are absolute, they support a set of rules that applies to everyone in general. Moral absolutism holds that moral and immoral acts are always so regardless of context. Other forms that fall into moral absolutism are ethical objectivism, …show more content…
It states that there are no absolute moral rules and that there is no right or wrong. Some cultures may view certain behaviors as morally right while others cultures may view the same behavior as morally wrong. For example, some Muslim countries belief that men and women are not supposed to date, and that their parents arrange the marriage (PBS). While Muslims see this as morally right for their parents to arrange the marriage other cultures may find it morally wrong. They think that is that person’s job to look for a spouse if they want to get married rather than their parents look for them. Muslims should not be judged because of their beliefs based on their culture and ethical relativism support them. Another example is that while in the United States and other countries women can go out without having to cover their faces in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and other places women need to go out with their faces covered. Every country has its own religion and society should not judge other religions just because women need to cover their faces. Because certain thing are morally right is some cultures, it does not being it needs to be morally right is the other cultures as …show more content…
For example, someone who believes in God would be against same sex marriage and say that homosexuality is an immoral and unnatural sin (Scripture). Usually a marriage is between a man and a woman, but that should not stop two same sex people from being happy and doing what makes them happy. Everybody should enjoy life and not judge other people based on their sexuality. God’s words or someone’s opinion should not affect a person point of view of life or stop living their life because someone simply says so. The Bible states that is wrong to kill a person and an unborn is a person, therefore is wrong to kill an unborn. Some people support that abortion should be illegal. For example, a woman who gets raped and finds out that she’s pregnant a few weeks after she got raped, should have the right to decide whether she wants to keep the baby or not. Also, a woman who cannot afford to have a baby because of the condition she lives should have the right to finish her pregnancy. For the case of the woman who got raped this baby could affect the woman in many ways. Even though the woman is going to love the baby, she will get reminded of what happened to her for the rest of her life because her daughter/son is the result of that rape. Is not fair that not only did she had to go through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For example, Communism and Christianity make divergent claims concerning the nature of reality. One or the other may be correct, or neither is correct; but they both cannot be correct at the same time. According to the Law of Non-Contradiction, no statement can be both true and false at the same time. Only one ethical view can correctly mirror reality (truth). Cultural relativism is built on the belief that truth is always relative to a non-absolute standard: one's own culture. This leaves God completely out of the picture or rather puts culture in the role of God. I do not agree with the belief that this ethical view presents referring to judging cultures. Sometimes you have to judge other cultures. What I mean is this: If a culture has a standard that defies the truth (God's laws) then they are wrong. If there was complete tolerance, there would be no justice. In…

    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pojman Ethical Relativism

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical Relativism is the belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the meaning of what is right and wrong depends on the individual and culture. Pojman breaks down Ethical Relativism into 2 main concepts: The Diversity Theory and the Dependency Theory. The Diversity Theory addresses the concept of what is morally right and wrong varies from society to society; therefore, there is no universal moral principles that all societies accept. For example, Homosexuality in the Middle East is a forbidden practice, while in ancient Greek culture, it was said to be a accepted practice. The Dependency Theory says that all moral principles receive their validity from cultural acceptance.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1]Absolutism and relativism both have their differences but actually relative is based on absolutism principles, because if it wasn’t the absolute relativism wouldn’t even be moral system. First I will start with Absolutism, Strength of Absolutism are, it has fixed standards so they won’t change and the actions can be measured against this, the guideline are clear and won’t ever get distorted for behaviour so in societies where absolutism is used as the single moral system citizens know their boundaries and would be more less likely to commit crimes because they know the consequences. When punishing people it keeps the consistency so no one person has a different or less punishment because the act will always be wrong- thus making the system fair for everyone. Absolutism morality makes it easier for governments to make rules because they know that committing that certain act will always be wrong and can choose a punishment that will fit all people.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What one may believe is right and worthy in their own culture may seem taboo in another culture’s standards. This is because of the use of cultural relativism, which is the belief that something is good or wrong if and only if it is approved or disapproved in a given culture. Right and wrong values vary from society to society; therefore, there is no standard base to judge what is universally right or wrong between the different cultures. Because of this, societies may disagree about the morality of what is right and wrong. Gensler believes that if cultural relativism is true, then there are no right or wrong moral values within a culture’s belief, because objective truths can still exist.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are numerous differences between absolute and relative morality which people use to base their everyday life choices, deciding whether an action is moral or immoral.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Vs Non Absolutisms

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As globalization brings the world together, there is much debate on who is, or what is the determining source to define ethics? “Ethical beliefs are highly diverse and often deeply held, especially when intertwined with local cultural or religious practices.” (Tweedie et al, 2012, p. 1). After much consideration, six major ethical systems exist in today’s world, and the six systems can then be further broken into two separate categories of absolutisms vs. non-absolutisms. According to Geisler (2010), “Since God’s moral character does not change,” it is considered absolute (p. 16). This absolutism is essential to understanding the difference between an unqualified absolutism system and a secular system such as generalism, which is discussed…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Subjective moral relativism underpins the view that reality of good standards is with respect to people. Whatever you accept is appropriate for you by and by is totally up to you to decide. Subjective relativism enables you to be sovereign over the rules that manage how you carry on with your…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of right and wrong varies from culture to culture. The five tenets of cultural relativism going to depth defining moral codes. Complications and moral questions arise when one culture begins harming another—Nazi genocide, war, imperialism, etc. Geographic boundaries blur in our technologically advanced, globalized world. The most daunting logical challenge presented by cultural relativism is it hinders a society from judging the codes or values of another society and even our own (Lecture 1).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays