Preview

Ethics Vs Non Absolutisms

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics Vs Non Absolutisms
As globalization brings the world together, there is much debate on who is, or what is the determining source to define ethics? “Ethical beliefs are highly diverse and often deeply held, especially when intertwined with local cultural or religious practices.” (Tweedie et al, 2012, p. 1). After much consideration, six major ethical systems exist in today’s world, and the six systems can then be further broken into two separate categories of absolutisms vs. non-absolutisms. According to Geisler (2010), “Since God’s moral character does not change,” it is considered absolute (p. 16). This absolutism is essential to understanding the difference between an unqualified absolutism system and a secular system such as generalism, which is discussed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    First I would like to challenge you to take some time out of your day to consider how countries have not only become closer together through globalization and how globalization as also created a unified moral perspective for countries that are conducting business with each other. Once you have, you will discover that management teams from across the world are realizing there are significant moral and ethical issues just waiting to be discovered by the enhanced progress we are seeing on a world wide scale. When ethics become a problem inside a specific country, just try to imagine the various issues which present themselves after the amount of people affected expands to a global scale. Now we are seeing different cultures that speak different languages all trying to find a solution to the problem. In the following essay we will cover two different articles, both focused on dealing with moral issues in two different countries from two different continents, China of Asia and India of the India-sub continent. Both of these articles help us to understand ethics on an international scale and how the business ethics of China and India compare to the business ethics of the United States.…

    • 2391 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fact that we see diversity between the morals of cultures is a clear indication that moral absolutes do not exist…

    • 628 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVERSALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of us like to believe that we are all born of sin and into sin regardless of what culture, race, ethnic identity, or class. We all have a sense of what is morally right and the relativity of it. There are traits, customs, and beliefs that make us distinctive to certain cultures, races, and classes, which due to the differences we all follow, a set of different moral standards. Each culture tackles moral questions based on their own moral beliefs. Universal moral requirements are presented to show that through differences there is still a huge connection of moral beliefs to show that we are more alike, than we as humans are willing to admit. Relativism maintains when it comes to right and wrong there is neither, because what is virtuous within a particular individual, culture or societies morality must be understood and taken into consideration (Mosser, 2010).…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “Some moral minima,” I must agree with Lenn Goodman’s opinions. Though they reflect, to the extreme, his relativism, I agree the topics he chose are all wrong in the eyes of another culture’s virtues and morals. This is a difficult decision because, even if it is true that no norm can be made absolute unless some other is compromised, unanimity is no proper standard of moral universality. We humans and the societies we constitute can be wrong. “Consent is a helpful marker, but neither necessary nor sufficient to legitimacy. Some whose interests are critically affected by our acts have no effectual say in our choices. Principles are principles; no norms delineating concretely, and uncompromisingly, wrong from right” (Goodman, L.E., 2010).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hunt, L. H. (2011). Ethics. Web: World Book. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from World Book…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This world is the abundant soil in which we plant our roots, but the quality and quantity of our growth often falls upon the virtues instilled by our environment. We exist in a society that blossoms with morals based on politics, geography, religion, and countless other variables. In such a society, it is virtually impossible for an entire world to agree on a set of morals to abide by, and therefore our world is saturated with the ideals of moral relativism, whether or not we see it blatantly. Moral relativism is often given the stigma of sprouting impurity or immorality, given the fact that it does not accept that there is a universal moral codex.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Ethics is transcendent and is based on the character of God as good (holy and loving)” (Sire, p.42). God is the author of ethics and provides measures of good. He gives us a conscious to discern what is right from wrong; this however, contradicts the post modernism who believe in ethical relativism. Francis S. Collins, a postmodernist, “argues that there are no absolute rights or wrongs and all ethical decisions are relative”. (Holder, 2011) Naturism says that since there is no lawgiver, we do not have standards for determining good from bad. They believe that moral values come from human experience. However, I believe that God has set the standard and through his Word, has told us what is right and wrong. Because he gives us a conscious it is ultimately up to us to make the decision to do things that will be pleasing in God’s eye. Since we are created in God’s image and want to please him, then we want to do things that line up with the character of him an reflect something of his…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the article “Some Moral Minima”, Lenn Goodman argues that there are certain moral wrongs that are universal. He describes four areas he believes are areas of universal moral wrongs in detail. Morality has been an issue that many societies all over the world have been trying to understand and contend with for a very long time. In this paper I will explain how I agree with Goodman on the belief that certain things are and should be considered simply wrong universally. I will also explore the challenges Goodman presents to relativism by using specific examples of these challenges. I will discuss how I think there should be such universal moral requirements and defend these answers. I will then be concluding that although I agree with Goodman’s argument, the theory of relativism makes one reconsider the logical reasoning of moral minima and if it is possible to have universal moral wrongs accepted by all societies and cultures.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What one may believe is right and worthy in their own culture may seem taboo in another culture’s standards. This is because of the use of cultural relativism, which is the belief that something is good or wrong if and only if it is approved or disapproved in a given culture. Right and wrong values vary from society to society; therefore, there is no standard base to judge what is universally right or wrong between the different cultures. Because of this, societies may disagree about the morality of what is right and wrong. Gensler believes that if cultural relativism is true, then there are no right or wrong moral values within a culture’s belief, because objective truths can still exist.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is There a Universal Standard for Ethics?, written by Walter Stace, is a staple point of distinction between Absolutism and Relativism. Stace explores this by questioning the universal standard of ethics that may arise. Ultimately, Stace’s question withdraws yet another conflict between ethical standards, and its evolution. Stace, in the fullness of time, agrees with the assumption of absolute and unvarying ethics, standards which have remained the same through every age. It is clear that Stace lacks a deeper distinction between the ancient and modern worlds. Ethical standards have evolved from the past to what they are presently. With a different lifestyle of freedom, consequence, and perspective of the world, the past established a clear…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral schools of thought dictate ethical behavior, however, every culture assigns ethical and moral values differently (Lecture 1). Without a moral or ethical structure, society would not prosper. Clashing cultural values make defining morality complicated. Ethicists argue the minimum conception of morality establishes a starting point based on reason that defines and installs a code of morality or ethics. The minimum conception of morality is an “effort to guide one’s conduct by reason—that is, to do what there are the best reasons for doing—while giving equal weight to the interests of each individual affected by one’s action” (Rachels 13).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is Ethics universal? Is it wrong to steal from someone regardless of what the culture you are in says on the matter? What about funeral customs? Is there a right or wrong way to deal with the bodies of those who have died? Some philosophers believe that there is no universal right or wrong and that the correct way to do things is based on what the morals of individual cultures say. Others, such as James Rachels, believe that there is a universal code of ethics that transcends the moral codes of individual cultures. In his essay, “Morality is Not Relative”, Rachels discusses ethical relativism, or as he calls it “Cultural Relativism”, and the logical problems that are associated with this code.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays