Preview

Examples Of Guilt In Julius Caesar

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
256 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Guilt In Julius Caesar
Persuaded by Antony’s logic the crowd started to realize that Caesar was not ambitious. Consequently, Antony used pathos, the appeal to emotions, to drag the audience into feeling guilty for doubting Caesar and to make them feel curious about the contents of Caesar’s will. To begin with, Antony asks the crowd, “You all did love him once, not without cause: What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?” (III.ii.101-102). With this question, Antony creates a feeling of guilt within the audience by indirectly saying that there is no reason for them to suddenly hate the man they all adored. This feeling of guilt helped Antony win the audience over because they felt like they believed Caesar to be ambitious and selfish way too quickly and easily.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Rhetorical Analysis of Julius Caesar

    In Brutus and Antony’s speeches both men share the strategy of swaying the crowd. In the middle of his speech, Brutus tries to quell the crowd’s anger because “as [Caesar] was valiant [he] honour him”, and because Caesar was “ambitious”, Brutus “slew” him. While speaking to the Roman citizens, Brutus places equal grammatical constructions near each other, and logically appeals to the crowd by showing a cause and effect for the killing of Julius Caesar. Although his efforts are seemingly effective, it is does not have the lasting impact of Antony’s appeals due to the fact that the roman people are not rational, because their emotions are running high. Antony states that Caesar “hath brought many captives” to Rome, “wept” when the poor cried, and “thrice presented him” a crown which he refused. Antony’s explicit details provide examples of Caesar’s good deeds, which logically appeals to the crowd, and renders Anthony’s sympathy toward Caesar justified. Although Antony also applies logical rhetoric to his oration, his strategy is more effective than Brutus’s because Brutus provided hypothetical details of Caesar’s misdoings, while Antony shares his specific memories of Caesar’s kindness and humility. Therefore, Antony’s strategy suggested Brutus and his fellow conspirators committed an unjust crime toward Caesar, and established a stronger impact on the crowd’s attitude.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Effects of Caesar's Rise to Power
    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Effects of Caesar's Rise to Power

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Persuasion In Julius Caesar
    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of Persuasion In Julius Caesar

    In the book, "Julius Caesar" persuasion is used to gain allies and power In the story, two of Caesar's long time friends, Cassius and Brutus, turn against him. To gain strength Cassius and Brutus create a conspiracy about Caesar to influence others to remove him from power. Throughout the book, there are many examples of jealousy and allusion used by Cassius for his benefit and the death of Caesar.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Devices Used In Julius Caesar
    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices Used In Julius Caesar

    Antony understood the audience very well and knew they would consider any other viewpoint on any topic. He realized that using his emotions would be the most beneficial way to persuade. He was able to use ethos by stating how Caesar was not too ambitious to have his life taken away from him (III,ii,94-99). Antony used pathos by having a visual, emotional impact on the people. He lifted up his cloak, showing the wounds, and telling where each conspirator had the power and the evil motivation to kill this worthy man…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mark Antony's Use of Rhetorical Appeals
    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mark Antony's Use of Rhetorical Appeals

    Initially, Antony uses Ethos to establish himself as a trusted and loyal figure to gain respect and trust of the plebeians. To gain the citizens’ attention, Antony begins Caesar’s funeral speech by reassuring them that he only “[came] to bury Caesar, not [to praise] him” (3.2.83). By only intending to bury Caesar, Antony convinces the audience to listen to his words because they are spoken with bitterness toward Caesar. With Antony in agreement with their newly instilled anger, the plebeians begin to trust Antony’s words even though his bitterness was not…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony Rhetorical Analysis
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark Antony Rhetorical Analysis

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Speech Rhetorical Analysis
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Speech Rhetorical Analysis

    This reflect poorly on Brutus' character because it shows that he was fine with betraying someone who thought so highly of him. It makes him seem uncaring, a trait that someone in power should not have. This portrays Brutus as cold-hearted. By saying this, Antony is building up Caesar's character. He shows his compassion for the people, and how he sees himself no better as the people- when they are sad, it affects him too. The makes him seem like a good…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar
    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Devices Julius Caesar

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Pathos Analysis
    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Pathos Analysis

    Later on in Antony’s eulogy, he holds Caesar’s will in his hand, and the mob demands to hear it. Although Antony refuses to read what is in the will, he still does so by telling them that “hearing the will of Caesar/ It will inflame you, it will make you mad/ ‘Tis good you know not that you are his heirs” (III, ii, 145-148). This is an example of pathos because Antony is purposely telling them what is in Caesar’s will. By doing so, he is manipulating the audience by appealing to the feeling of anger. Antony takes a moment to pause, and says “bear with me; my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me” (III, ii, 108-109). Antony is purposely breaking down and taking a moment to pause so that the crowd will show him sympathy. This will also make the crowd feel guilty about betraying Caesar. The feeling of guilt and betrayal against Caesar will make them turn their heads against…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar
    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

    In the play of “Julius Caesar”, after Brutus speech about killing Caesar is for the good of Rome, Mark Antony began his speech, despite to all of the people who disagreed to his speech or the truth, he still wanted to revenge to those who murdered his beloved friend Caesar. Instead of using ethos or logos, Antony uses pathos to gain the crowd flavor and it’s extremely effective. Antony manages the people of Rome to almost cry for Caesar death and wanted to revenge for Caesar.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Brutus Speech Analysis
    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Brutus Speech Analysis

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Scapegoating Analysis
    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Scapegoating Analysis

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Cassius, a main character, discussed the integral role of humanity's decisions, saying, "The fault...is not in our stars, but in ourselves" (I.ii.139-141). Within a modern context, Cassius's viewpoint is secular, demanding that all of us, not fate, is in control of the courses of our lives. However, it is also countercultural as our society ingrains itself in the norm of scapegoating, where humanity points to individuals/groups whom we can dump our rage for our societal plagues. Scapegoating is a topical issue today as we blame Islam for terrorism and sexism, Hispanics/African Americans for rape, drugs, and shootings, and etc. As we continue excluding different groups, our society confirms stereotypes…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Revenge In Julius Caesar
    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of Revenge In Julius Caesar

    “Revenge! About! Sneak! Burn! Fire!…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics