Preview

Examine the Significance of the Televised Debates in Presidential Election Campaigns

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
471 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine the Significance of the Televised Debates in Presidential Election Campaigns
Examine the significance of the televised debates in presidential election campaigns

Televised presidential debates are held between the two major party presidential candidates that occur during September and October of the presidential election year. There is also traditionally one debate between the two vice-presidential candidates. The first debates were held in 1960, but it was another 16 years before televised debates were held again.

There have only really been two debates that have been significant in shaping the outcome of the race. The first was in the debate held in October, 1980 between President Jimmy Carter and his Republican challenger, Ronald Reagan. At the end of their 90-minute debate, each candidate was given 3 minutes to make a closing statement. Reagan had cleverly posed a series of questions to which he knew the majority of voters would answer in the negative. And with the election day less than a week away, he managed to shape the way voters would make up their minds in these vital last days of the campaign. Support for President Carter fell away badly following the debate and on election day he won only six states.

Reagan also featured in the second memorable debate moment when he went up against former Vice President Walter Mondale. By this time Reagan was already 73, and age was becoming an issue in the campaign. After a question was posed about President Reagan’s capability due to his age, Reagan came back with a quick response that won the audience over, leading to 49-state victory.

But most debates are not ‘game-changing’ event. True, Al Gore probably lost some support by rolling his eyes and sighing while George W. Bush was speaking during their first televised debate in 2000. And even though Mitt Romney came out victorious after the first debate between himself and President Obama due to a ‘lack-lustre’ performance by Obama in 2012, Obama still went on to win the election.

Television debates can often be an emphasis on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon were the candidates for the 1960 presidential election, both winning their nominations on the first ballot. Kennedy was the first to be nominated. He had won impressive victories over Hubert Humphrey in the primaries. Once nominated, JFK chose Lyndon Johnson as his running mate. Johnson, the Senate Majority Leader, was an strong politician who was looking out solely for Kennedy 's election. Two weeks after the Democratic convention, the Republicans nominated Richard Nixon. Nixon chose former Massachusetts Senator and United Nations Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. as his Vice Presidential candidate. The first televised Presidential debate, aired on September 26, 1960, between Democratic candidate John F. Kennedy and Republican Richard Nixon. Television was a new and upcoming communication tool widely available during the 1960 presidential campaign. Senator John F. Kennedy’s ingenious use of this mass medium, specifically in the televised presidential debates, helped secure him gain presidency over Vice President Richard M. Nixon. Kennedy’s victory marked a new era of new innovative political…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Presidential Debate of 2012, presidential candidate Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama both explain their views and key aspects on taxes, oil/energy, and immigration by arguing and stating their opinions and ideas. However Barack Obama conveys his message more directly and thoroughly than Romney.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The entire spectacle appears to be a disingenuous attempt by the media to have even legitimate grievances about the debate formats. Because these are not really debates, in the sense that they don’t allow candidates to fully articulate positions, but rather to deflect and defend themselves while attacking opponents’ positions. Reasoned arguments are nearly impossible with eleven people on a single stage, each one trying to stand out from the others. These debates are spectacles, entertainment for the masses and nothing more than excuses for partisans to do…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    debates have occurred regularly and are becoming institutionalized as a practice in American elections. Third-party candidates have fewer chances to join presidential debates, especially if the two major party candidates do not agree to debate them. Unless it becomes in the interest of both parties to have a third-party candidate debate, as it was in 1992 with Ross Perot, it will be very difficult for third-party candidates to become a part of the presidential debates. Even though third parties have debated each other in presidential election years, the fate of third parties in receiving national coverage or joining the two major party candidates in presidential debates is uncertain. It is also unclear how much effect debates have on American…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the first debate where estimated 100 million people watching, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton shook hands with smile on the stage, and Lester Holt of NBC nightly news explained the rule of the debate. It was a temperament test for Trump to prove that he is suitable for the President. However, he failed to do so in my opinion. This debate proves that he is not sincere, not patient enough to listen, not honest, not prepared enough, and absolutely not suitable for being the President.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the elections less than a few months away, political debates always seem to get the best of politicians and their supporters. This year’s debate was nothing short of unexpected controversies. Shortly after the debate held on the night of September 9th, uproar arose all over America after the remarking comments that candidate Hilary Clinton made about Donald Trump and his supporters.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tension City

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Lehrer, James. "Killer Question." Tension City: Inside the Presidential Debates, from Kennedy-Nixon to Obama-McCain. New York: Random House, 2011. 30-50. Prints.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Democratic Debate was really good. I honestly enjoyed watching it time just flew by. After it ended I just wanted to keep watching more. It was so refreshing hearing people talk about the real issues in this country, like the economy, healthcare, education, and corruption. Unlike the Republican Debate which mostly focused on Planned Parenthood, Donald Trump, and Iran.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After talking to co-workers about this topic, since I was 14 during the 2004 election, I received the information that candidates in the 2004 election were less aggressive when it came to attacking people and focused more on “why you should vote for me” instead of the 2008 election where it became “why you shouldn’t vote for them”. This seems like a strong reason why people would vote differently because all they are seeing is “yes, I agree with his stance on that topic but he really did that”. It becomes who can shoot more bullets in the other person’s head first wins.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the biggest events going on this year is the Presidential Campaigns. Every four years we elect a new President into office. Candidates are faced with so many challenges in making their personal decisions on who to select as President. We have two parties running we have the Democratic and Republican. When trying to select the President as a candidate you have so many different viewpoints and opinion to see who would your state overcome some of the obstacles we have faced in life. When watching both debates you would have no idea they are talking about the same country because of the topics discussed by the Democrats were completely different than those discussed by the Republicans. There were a lot of pressing matters discussed by each…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln Douglas Debates

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1858 Abraham Lincoln and Stephen a Douglas embarked on a series of debates and effort to win a seat in the Senate. This time Lincoln was not very well known in the political arena in contrast to Douglas who was a lifelong political player. However, after the debates Lincoln vaulted into the national spotlight continuing on to eventually win the Presidential election of 1860. Lincoln had originally proposed that he and Douglas engage in these debates, and discuss in depth the issues of the day including the issue of slavery as it related to the new territories of Kansas, Nebraska, Utah, Texas, California and New Mexico.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Learning how to gain the attention of viewers by evoking emotions out of their audience. So, before viewing a deceiving advertisement or a biased article about either candidate, try to watch the full interview or the full debate before someone else’s opinion steers you in the wrong direction. As well as most media outlets do not even give their readers insight on what the candidates’ plans for the future are. I do not think the right topics are being discussed. The media just talks about past accusations and what has happened rather than what will happen, or what the plans for the future are. We live in a time period where technological advances can give us substantial benefits for the future, however these candidates are not questioned on these important matters. Instead of asking either candidate what they did 7 – 10 years ago, why not ask either of them what technological improvements will they dedicate to their presidential term that will impact energy, vaccine cures for diseases that have haunted this world for 2,000+ years and future epidemics, educational technology, as well as overall well…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having a president with no party affiliation, would mean candidates would have a difficult time raising money for their campaigns. Money is important for elections to help influence and mobilize voters (Kernell, et al.). Campaigning for presidency is a money contest between each candidate and party. For example, the last election Trump was able to spend so much of his personal money to get what he wanted and did not have to rely as much on donors. Modern campaigns are based on technology such as television, internet, radio, and social media (Kernell, et al.). Despite its importance, technology is expensive, which means candidates need an exorbitant amount of money to have a successful presidential campaign. Although, there are regulations on funding during elections, the Supreme Court ruled that the government cannot create laws restricting how much an individual can contribute (Kernell, et al.). Candidates spend so much time and money campaigning, when they should focus on connecting with the people. During national party nominating conventions,…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Presidential debate is seen by almost everyone in America, and it helps the nominees to further their campaign based on the things that they say and how they portray themselves. In order for them to be successful and win, they must persuade, inform and entertain them about themselves. Along with that they have to keep their body language a little bit hidden so that their reactions aren’t obvious.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The election of 1876 was an early example of a voting controversy, in which difficulty in counting and tabulating votes led to difficulty in determining who was the victorious candidate in the election. This election was between Rutherford B. Hayes running against Samuel J. Tilden. The reason for the controversy was the result of errors in three state submissions of results concerning the election. The election of 1888 was noteworthy only because the candidate who won the election did not win the popular vote, which is an oft-considered consequence of the Electoral College system. The most recent controversial election was the election of 2000. The election of 2000 was an incredibly contentious election, in which the results were debated and argued over for quite a long time before it was finally resolved. George W. Bush won the election, as a result, even though Bush did not won the popular…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays