Preview

What Are The Pros And Cons Of The First Presidential Debate

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Are The Pros And Cons Of The First Presidential Debate
The First Presidential Debate

At the first debate where estimated 100 million people watching, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton shook hands with smile on the stage, and Lester Holt of NBC nightly news explained the rule of the debate. It was a temperament test for Trump to prove that he is suitable for the President. However, he failed to do so in my opinion. This debate proves that he is not sincere, not patient enough to listen, not honest, not prepared enough, and absolutely not suitable for being the President. During the debate, he lied several times against Clinton’s comments and talked about issues which were not true. At the beginning, he made a false statement about large job losses in Michigan and Ohio, which actually both states

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    debate. During the debate Kennedy wore a dark suit; however, Nixon wore a light suit and a collar that was too big for him. Kennedy was a junior senator, but Nixon was vice president for 8 years under president Eisenhour’s term. Kennedy’s actions proved him to be confident and self-aware rather than Nixon being sweaty and tired. There were many differences between the two candidates, but they had their similarities. For example, they both had political experience, both eventually became president, and both finished the first televised presidential debate. That debate was historical and an important part of shaping the United States today.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump is going to be the 45th President of the United States. Aziz Ansari wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times with a stark claim that Donald Trump is not fit to be president. The article is grounded in emotional appeal, racial tension, and attacks on the candidate. The first and most obvious...…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The careless actions within politics, especially during an election year like 2016, is alarming. It is not easy to be completely aware of all the hullabaloo that goes on in the political affairs, but it is important to be in the know about the few mishaps of those seeking authority. Government exists to protect its citizens, but what happens when the security goes too far? The outspoken and well-informed, William Binney, was a high ranking officer amid his 30 years at the NSA (National Security Agency), but disbanded from the organization shortly after 2001, a year when America’s fearful tendencies were at a tipping point . Binney is a whistleblower, which is any crooked government’s nemesis. Hilary Clinton has been on the political scene since her husband walked into the White House in 1993 . Although she has been under much pressure…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There's doubtlessly about it: being the U.S. president is a hard and frequently difficult employment. Richard Nixon broadly said, "Scouring floors and exhausting bedpans has as much respect as the Presidency."…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 16th at his very own Trump Tower in New York City, Donald Trump announced that he would be running for president. It was only thirty seconds into his speech when Trump committed his first fallacy. In an attempt to insult the intelligence of his fellow GOP candidates, he compared their incompetence toward air conditioners to their supposed inability to beat ISIS. “They didn’t know the air-conditioner didn’t work,” “How are they going to beat ISIS?” This is a bad example fallacy due to his use of an example that fails to prove the conclusion and has little connection to it. Despite the complete lack of relation between Trump’s example and his conclusion, he was still able to provoke the audience into feelings of contempt toward the other…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When he lied, he lost a good chunk of followers from his own party which then jumped on board with the independent candidate of Ross Perot. Perot was able to receive a fair amount of votes just due to the angry conservationists jumping on board with Perot because they didn’t want to vote for a democrat. He also lost his once democratic followers that liked Reagan and therefore wanted Bush as the next president so that was more votes Clinton was able to take away. It is believed by many that without Perot receiving the amount…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the elections less than a few months away, political debates always seem to get the best of politicians and their supporters. This year’s debate was nothing short of unexpected controversies. Shortly after the debate held on the night of September 9th, uproar arose all over America after the remarking comments that candidate Hilary Clinton made about Donald Trump and his supporters.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Presidency as a whole has changed in many ways throughout the course of history; specifically, in the relationship between the president and the public. The Constitution is vague when it describes communication of the president: a president must say why they veto a bill, and they must inform the public on the state of the union (Ellis 82). President George Washington had the task of establishing how the president would interact with the public. During the early days of the presidency the President communicated seldomly with the public; this is because the president was supposed to be held at a higher standard than the public, and they were supposed to communicate with Congress. Washington worked towards having the office of the president…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to communication, Donald Trump had a very unique approach. He does not “play it safe” at all. Instead, he is bold and rather casual in debates, and it works. Donald Trump is appealing to a younger crowd beginning with his communication strategy. He talks like he is in high school. He uses his words in a clear way where everyone can comprehend the message he is trying to get across. While it could potentially and did in fact offend people who find themselves more sophisticated, it appealed to the average person. Also, he has sort of mastered exploiting whoever his current opponent is. He proclaims whatever he wants about them, not paying much attention to the truth. For anyone who feels that they have lack of power or are voiceless,…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Democratic Debate was really good. I honestly enjoyed watching it time just flew by. After it ended I just wanted to keep watching more. It was so refreshing hearing people talk about the real issues in this country, like the economy, healthcare, education, and corruption. Unlike the Republican Debate which mostly focused on Planned Parenthood, Donald Trump, and Iran.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the third Presidential Debate both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump both have strong arguments and strong beliefs, but the way Clinton uses rhetorical appeal to catch the attention of her audience is outstanding. She is a career politician and is able to convey her points and views much more effectively than Donald Trump. The three main points that I find to be very interesting are abortion, gun laws and the tax cuts. All three of these topics are very hot topics, now do I agree with everything she says no but she has all the right arguments to win a debate. She keeps her calm better than Trump, that’s not to say she doesn’t show signs of breaking from frustration but compared to him she is much more experienced. Donald Trump sometimes comes off as an…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2.) I don't think Trump is being reasonable. People are relying on debates to see what the candidates think about certain issues. If a candidate is not there, people won't get his/her persepective on these issues. Also, it shows to people that Trump will back down even if he is offended by one person.…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the presidential election there were many concerns surrounding Donald J. Trump. Everyone was curious as to what kind of president he would be considering how he presented himself as a candidate, outspoken and Since it was announced that Donald J. Trump won President of the United States there have been much controversy amongst people and not only from people of the United States but of other nations as well.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Great Debaters

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Great Debaters offers a fictionalized and limited account of the exploits of the award-winning Wiley College debate team headed by Melvin B. Tolson, an African-American English professor, during the Depression years. Beyond his academic duties, Tolson was an accomplished poet, journalist and social activist.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln and Douglas Debates

    • 1171 Words
    • 34 Pages

    The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 were a series of seven debates between Abraham Lincoln, the republican candidate, and the incumbent Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Party candidate, for a seat in the United States Senate. During the time period of the debates, Senators were elected by state legislators; therefore Lincoln and Douglas were competing for their respective parties to win control of the Illinois Legislature. The main issue for the debates was overwhelmingly about slavery and anything tied into dealing with slavery. “As the fifties wore on, an exhaustive, exacerbating and essentially futile conflict over slavery raged to the exclusion of nearly all other topics.” So, with slavery at the center of attention, you had two politicians at the end of both spectrums. First, you had the incumbent Senator Stephen Douglas, who was definitely pro-slavery. Then, of course, you had Abraham Lincoln who opposed Stephen Douglas’s ideas. The debates were to be held in each of the nine congressional districts in Illinois. The debates themselves were a very big deal. They came at a time in which our nation was at a crossroads of very important issues to come, with slavery at the helm. The debates drew very large crowds which were enormously in-tune with what was going on and were deeply entrenched to which side they were on. Newspapers also sent court reporters to type the complete text of the debates, which would be released nationally. The newspaper coverage of the debates was deeply biased as well, with each side having different newspapers in their corner. “For the first time reporters were assigned to cover candidates throughout the long campaign season. The Chicago Press and Tribune, the most influential Republican paper in the state, sent the skilled shorthand expert Robert R. Hitt to report every word of the debates, and James B. Sheridan and Henry Binmore performed the same service for Douglas’s organ, the…

    • 1171 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays