Evolutionary Psychology: Nature Vs. Nurture

Due to the evolutionary psychologists in the text „Nature Versus Nurture: The Battle Continues“ women and men have no choice how they act. Both are bound to different behavior patterns, which is the consequence of the evolutionary progress. All along the task of the men was to impregnate as most woman as possible to save the continuity of their race, while women always have been the ones that had to born and raise the children. Therefore the males concentrated on getting as most as possible partners, while women persued only few partners who stay with them and help raising up their children. Emotional skills, that could lead to a long-term relationship were not needed for the males. Instead they focused in improving their physical skills in order to be a ready for fight. The opposite goes for women.

An argumentation that makes sense referring to the history of manhood. Additionally men and women have a different distribution of hormones, which verifiably has an influence on the character of humans. Men have a higher testosterone level which for example is responsible for muscle development and sperm production. Two functions which are important for the tasks, that were mentioned by the evolutionary psychologists (EP's) – Improving of physical skills and the impregnation of women. Females instead have a higher estrogenic level, which, for
Men that are not practical or technophile, do not like sports and are not interested in maturing. Also there are women that are not interested in giving birth to children or raising them up. This is a big contradiction against the theory of the EP's. There are even people, who do not want to be a men or a women anymore and transgender themselves. This means that it is not only our history nor our hormones who let us act like we act. There has to be other