Preview

Evaluation of the Free Market Economy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
646 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluation of the Free Market Economy
Evaluate the Free Market Economy It is essential for every society to have some type of economic system in order to utilize their scarce resources to satisfy people’s unlimited wants. One specific type of economic system is the free market economy; an economy that is based off the citizens choice and not directed by the government. In this economy people can buy and sell goods and services, and this is completely controlled by consumers and producers. Every economy has advantages and disadvantages but in this case the free market’s disadvantages outweigh its advantages. A free market has fewer disadvantages to list but the value of what is lost is much greater than the benefits. Limited government involvement, also described as laissez faire, means that the young and poor will not have any means of support or benefits. Sick people will be too ill to be able to take care of themselves leaving them alone and without public health care. The society will also be in harm due to no national defense or security. Citizens will also be deprived from benefiting from programs such as Social Security and financial aid. Another disadvantage also comes from little government involvement. With limited government involvement an unequal distribution of wealth will then be created. Some people will have much more money than they need and others will be in need of more economic support. Some workers might be paid too little and then they will not be able to consume as much as production calls for, therefore leaving the economy in a state of disarray. Another impact of little government involvement that affects everybody in all classes is the lack of national defense. No matter how much money someone has they would not pay for protection that could easily be provided for free. Without the benefits that government involvement can aid us with many people would be left struggling, that is why the disadvantages outweigh the rest. A free market economy has many advantages such as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian Federal Budget

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Under the free market system, some needs of the community may not be satisfied and this has then lead to limitations within the market. These limitations include the provision of goods and services, income distribution, externalities and fluctuation in the economic activity.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The advantages of a market economy is the ability for an individual to purchase any product that they wish through any company, the creation of competition which help to create either better quality products, cheaper products, or a mixture of both in turn giving consumers choices to choose from, and also the ability to create and own your own businesses if you wish. The disadvantages of such a system is limited government influence, because of limited government influence/ regulations workers rights are sometimes not taken into consideration and our natural resources and environment are depleted through lack of care and consideration because it’s all about making a profit. Government regulation is needed to keep businesses/ corporations in check.…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ECO/561

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In a market system, competition is the driving force or the mechanism of control in the market economy. This allows firms to seek alternative technique and use the lowest-cost of production to produce goods and services. On the other hand, command system is like a one way street where the government is the central planner. It does not create room for products improvement, limited goods are produced, and no competition. The market system allows the invisible hand to coordinate the resources of household and business. Another interesting concept is the Circular Flow Model of the dynamics of market economy. This model explains how resources flow from households to businesses through the resources market, and how businesses sell products to households through the product market. In addition, monetary flows or a real flow is counterclockwise of the circular flow model where households receive income or wages from businesses through the resource market, and in return, businesses input their expenditures into producing goods or services and receive revenue from households through products market (McConnell, Brue & Flynn, 2009).…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine living in a world where the government controlled: what goods you could produce, the quantities of goods you could produce, and the price of those goods. Nothing was in your realm of jurisdiction. This may sound familiar to some. This type of economy is known as a controlled or planned economy, some communist countries use this economic system, such as, Cuba, North Korea, and the former Soviet Union. Now, let's jump to the other side of the economic spectrum to free enterprise or free market.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    abc123

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A free market is a market in which there is no economic intervention and regulation by the state, except to enforce private contracts and the ownership of property. It is relying on the mechanism of private ownership. A free-market economy is an economy where all markets within it are unregulated by any parties other than those players in the market. In its purest form the government plays a neutral role in its administration and legislation of economic activity. However, an economy in this form has never existed.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naked Economics

    • 2868 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The first chapter begins with an interesting story about how an advertising strategy by Coca Cola Europe proves to be a losing proposition at the start of 1989 but ends in impressive results by the end of 1995. There are myriad of different ways everyday that make modern economy work. Wheelan begins with the question, "Who feeds Paris?" as a starting point to explain how markets are powerful influences in an individual's every day life. Wheelan explains how markets use prices to allocate scarce resources and how markets are self-correcting. Wheelan expounds on how the market gears up and aligns incentives such that individuals work for their own self-interest for an improved standard of living. In no uncertain terms, the author explains how the Soviet socialist economy failed because the bureaucracy of the government controlled the economy. This chapter makes a strong stand that it is not fair to impose preferences on others. He alleges that it is "bad economics to impose preferences on individuals whose lives are much different from all the rest." (p 7).…

    • 2868 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a public enterprise economy, the government has the power to nationalize any or all industries which can lead to devastating consequences. One the countries famous for doing this was the Soviet Union. Joseph Stalin, the then dictator of the Soviet Union instituted two domestic policies that would eliminate any capitalism in Russia. He would institute rapid industrialization and the collectivization of agriculture.This would be known as the Five Year Plan. Stalin wanted to change all private owned farms into state owned farms as he thought this would improve agricultural productivity. This grain was then expected to feed all the urban workers and any surplus would pay for programs and factories related to industrialization. He would put down a certain quota that the farmers needed to reach by a certain amount of time. However the farmers were not allowed to take grain away from what they were growing for the state until they met the quota. This led to a massive famine of 1932-33 in the Ukraine in which millions died. At first the peasants resisted the idea of collective farms and so Stalin purged the land of any that opposed it. In 1929, Stalin needed to finance his industrialization plans so he raised the quotas of grain in the Ukraine by forty percent. By raising the quotas so high, the farmers would not be able to produce enough food to feed themselves and as it was illegal for them to take any until the quotas were met. Those farmers that did not appear to be starving were suspected of hoarding grain. In the end the death toll in the Ukrained was over six million people dead. This clearly shows how when the government has the power to nationalize industries like agriculture, devastating results can occur. The Russian government was trying to progress itself forward economically at any price even the death of its citizens. This type of government presence in the economy should not be promoted due to the serious problems it can cause.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let me elaborate on the first benefit of the free market, the conditions allowing the economy to thrive. The fact that free market is created by individual business persons, proves open competition in the market. It also allows individuals to increase their income and achieve economic growth. For example, Japan is a country with a high standard living. Their economy is very strong in the world. It is because the Japanese work very hard and they have a competitive market background. If they were lazy they would not be successful. So Japan is a good model of free market economy.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The complete absence of government, or anarchy, like the presence of any form of government, has both good and bad consequences. Government regulates commerce and imposes taxes on both corporations and people. This means that without government there would not be a certain amount of money taken out people’s paychecks every month. However, without a government, there would be an absence of minimum wage. Salaries as well as work hours would completely depend on the employer. The absence of government means that there would be no laws preventing unfair treatment of employees and unsafe work areas. Without government and taxes, there would be no government funded projects like the building of bridges, roads, and dams. The absence of government would mean the absence of a public school…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free, unfettered markets provide incentives - through price and profit - to allow resources to find their most efficient and beneficial use. The market allows people to make decisions as to what type of behavior they will choose. Will they consume, invest, save, or produce? The market will determine the answer. The incentive for a profit is what drives people to produce products for sale. Thus it is the individual, not the government that drives the economy, although the government does try to affect consumer decisions through…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The blunt reality is that our economic wants for exceed the productive capacity of our scarce (limited) resources. We are forced to make choices. This unyielding truth underlies the definition of economics, which is the social science concerned with how individuals, institutions, and society make optimal (best) choices under conditions of scarcity (McConnell, Brue, & Flynn, 2012). Scarce economic resources mean limited goods and services. Scarcity restricts options and demands choices. Because we “can’t have it all’, we must decide what we will have and what we must forgo. At the care of economics is the idea that “there is no free lunch”. You may be treated to lunch, making it “free” from your perspective, but someone bears a cost.…

    • 4682 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Mr. Michael Bay, author of the Book, “Managerial Economics and Business Strategy”, they have treated the market as a place where firms and consumers come together to trade goods and services with no intervention from government. But as you are aware, rules and regulations that are passed and enforced by government enter into almost every decision firms and consumers make. As a manager, it is important to understand the regulations passed by government, why such regulations have been passed, and how they affect optimal managerial decisions. We will begin by examining four reasons why free markets may fail to provide the socially efficient quantities of goods: (1) market power, (2) externalities, (3) public goods, and (4) incomplete information. The book analysis includes an overview of government policies designed to alleviate these “market failures” and an explanation of how the policies affect managerial decisions. The power of politicians to institute policies that affect the allocation of resources in markets provides those adversely affected with an incentive to engage in lobbying activities. The book will illustrate the underlying reasons for these types of rent-seeking activities. The book will examine how these activities can lead politicians to impose restrictions such as quotas and tariffs in markets affected by international trade.…

    • 2577 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Laissez Faire

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages

    I think government should have a limited role in the economy, it should regulate it just enough to keep it stable. In laissez faire big business is basically allowed to do whatever it wants, short of murder without any legal ramifications. If big businesses are allowed to grow unrestrained they will most likely do so until monopolies are the only form of business left. If this happens there is nothing to stop these monopolies from taking advantage of the consumers who in the end would end up having no choice but to shell out large amounts of money for any and most likely all products produced by those monopolies. The way that big business would go about doing this in a laissez-faire system is by driving its competitors out of business. Big business…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    free market → (failure of capitalism = neo liberalism in economics ) → problem of unregulated market…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays