Preview

Essay On Absence Of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Absence Of Government
The complete absence of government, or anarchy, like the presence of any form of government, has both good and bad consequences. Government regulates commerce and imposes taxes on both corporations and people. This means that without government there would not be a certain amount of money taken out people’s paychecks every month. However, without a government, there would be an absence of minimum wage. Salaries as well as work hours would completely depend on the employer. The absence of government means that there would be no laws preventing unfair treatment of employees and unsafe work areas. Without government and taxes, there would be no government funded projects like the building of bridges, roads, and dams. The absence of government would mean the absence of a public school …show more content…
Many who oppose government and advocate anarchy are in favor of voluntary associations or non-hierarchal organizations. However, the absence of government and presence of anarchy, to many, is unrealistic and dangerous because it can only be favorable to all under the assumption that we, as humans, are inherently good and will not cause mayhem if all law enforcement ceases to exist. Philosopher Immanuel Kant described anarchy as “freedom and law without force,” but to many freedom means being able to walk outside without fear and with the knowledge that our rights are protected by a system put in place in order to inforce the law. While the absence of government does relieve us from the restraints that impede our complete freedom, it also makes our safety completely dependent on the idea that humans are inherently good, an idea that has been proven wrong time and again through systematic racism, slavery, murder, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Abbey believes that the government institutes of today are “houses built on greed” (Abbey, 28) which they are. The American government of today is a perfect example of this. Our government was created because we opposed tariffs being placed of on our goods, tariffs that threatened the wealth of the rich, white men. These men soon become our founding fathers and they continued to work in the best interest of those who they identified with, which was not at all the common people. People like these men are our leaders of today. Not only are these leaders greedy and selfish they are also powerful. These leaders are in positions which allow them to make policies that effect a vast number of people. They are in a position where they can bend the views of their “subjects” by their words or through force, and this makes these leaders powerful. Abbey states that “Power corrupts.” (Abbey, 25) and so the power that the government has will corrupt the governing system. A corrupt government does not rule effectively and so Abbey offers a solution. The solution is anarchy. Abbey believes that anarchy is the perfect democracy because it disperse all sorts of powers equally in regards of each individual. Anarchy would eliminate the need for rulers because individuals would govern themselves by being “self disciplined” (Abbey 27) and by having “character”. This not only reflects the transcendentalist belief of not only the worth of an individual to a society, but also the belief that all people are supremely good and so is able to govern themselves. Abbey believes that all people are genuinely good and are able to be in control of their own lives in every way without being enforced to follow rules set by the…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning of his pamphlet, Thomas Paine discusses the differences between government and society. He states that society is a positive thing to have, and that it stems from the things people want in life. Government, however, stems from the darkness inside of people. Paine says in his book, “Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil.” He goes on to say that the only purpose a government has is to protect, and should want to do that at any cost. Paine then compares America to stranded people on an island, saying that the people are bound to create laws for themselves.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    `In "Civil Disobedience," Thoreau begins an attack on the philosophy of a strong ruling government by saying, "I heartily accept the motto 'That government is best which governs least;' and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically." (Thoreau 1614) Thoreau further states that he holds the belief that man will be able to have a government that does not govern at all. He believes that the need for government really arises from the requirement of people to have a sort of "machine" to control things and make their decisions for them. Thoreau explains that the only time government has helped is when it has stood aside. In fact government does not: keep the country free, settle the west, or educate; rather such achievements come from the character of the people. The message I received from reading Thoreau is to avoid associating with government all together, that people should live by their conscience not the laws of an unjust government. When people do this they can explore new ideas and be creative. Thoreau is trying to challenge the average person to live up to their potential, which…

    • 786 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even before Americans were known as Americans they rejected a strong central government. They have always worried that it would give the government too much power. They feared they would lose their liberty. People have always feared that a strong central government would end in their destruction and to prevent that they did not let the government have too much power, as seen in the Albany Plan, the Articles of Confederation, and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's not the rioters that cause harm to others because they support lawlessness over principled anarchy. The real anarchists are the intellectuals, the philosophers, the rednecks, the geniuses, the patriots, and every other person in between. Anarchists are all around, and all they want is to live life by affecting and being affected by no one else. Anarchy can be done in American society, as that was proven throughout this paper as we looked into the framework of anarchy, discovered the first forms of government, explored anarchist beliefs and concepts, and finally showed the correlation between anarchy and major ideals within the US. So go out, reject authority and live your life for…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarian Stereotypes

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is a misconception that these people assume from criticisms libertarians have about government. People assume since this group is so critical about government that libertarians do not want any form of government. However, that is simply untrue. Michael Shermer outlines the basics of what it means to be a libertarian in his online article “The Case for Libertarianism” when he states “But, basically, libertarians are for freedom and liberty for individuals, and yet we recognize that in order to be free we must also be protected. Libertarianism is grounded in the Principle of Freedom: All people are free to think, believe, and act as they choose, as long as they do not infringe on the equal freedom of others”. Being a libertarian simply means wanting to maximize individual freedom and minimize government intervention which is also why being libertarian is not synonymous with being an anarchist. An anarchist wants no government as opposed to a libertarian who just wants a limited…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One view that could be adopted is that of Hobbes, that is to say, that in a state of nature negative liberties would be minimal because of the “war of all against all”. It is therefore a necessary evil to implement laws which protect the liberty of individual citizens. Without such a law, anarchy would give free rein to individuals in order to exploit each other, which directly contradicts Mill's harm principle. The state is therefore necessary for the realisation of individual liberty, especially negative liberty. A “leviathan” neutral umpire would therefore be required to ensure that citizens are protected from others encroaching upon their individual liberty, in cases such as fraud, theft and aggression. However, it is argued by MIll that the state must remain minimal, since further laws such as curfews etc which are intended to protect the liberty of individuals, would hamper negative liberty, which is not in the best interests of a state's citizens.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Paine, three great political philosophers, all view the nature of man and society as anarchical, which is a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority, making it “war of all against all”. The utopian society of individuals enjoys complete freedom without government, wherein there is a display of a lack of morality for most of the time.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our Founding Fathers were worried that a direct democracy would lead foolish votes due to passion and/or popular opinion that people held…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The British government had a plethora of problems that most people complained about. When the Americans saw these problems they decided to go off and start their own government. This government came along with a Constitution, a Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence. These three things helped the people have, basically a mind of their own, the government was not controlling them.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First Assisgnment

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page

    - An advantage of Governmental involving is that if you get laid off you can get money to help you out from the government. Also all businesses are privately owned and they are able to seek profits in ways that make the best sense for them. Companies are free to pay workers what they choose and workers are free to work where they wish. But the disadvantage is that the government doesn’t give you enough money to make it through. Another problem that can develop is that natural resources, such as minerals, plants, and raw materials, may be reduced or even completely used up. If I could change something I would build more building and make jobs for people who need money the most.…

    • 268 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anarchism, not in the sense of lawlessness, but in the sense of noninterventionist governmental policy and activity, has a colorful history in the United States. It has enjoyed periods of welcoming and periods of scorn by every class of people and for widely varied reasons. It is embraced by free market economists and by the socially liberal, favored in part by both major parties and wholly endorsed by the Libertarian Party in the U.S. today. In the past, its place has been substantially different, for at different periods of time, different policies and mindsets on the parts of the citizens and the government have been at the forefront of progressive thought. Whether it is considered novel, conservative, beneficial, or detrimental is all dependent on a large array of contemporary social and economic considerations.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I am going to discuss how this is a very flippant statement. Anarchy is not necessarily a negative thing. Law needs anarchy to exist. Humanity needs law to exist. So there is a sort of double standard. In an effort to deliberate this further, research in this area has helped me have a better understanding. Also finding out why and how peoples beliefs make them act in a certain way to become ‘anarchists’. The criminal idea of anarchy. The psychology behind it is very interesting. Law and anarchy is everywhere in life, as simple as a home there is law and anarchy. The ruler and the follower. Life is not simply black and white; there are most certainly more grey shades.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government plays a huge role in regulating the economy, and without this their can be many people and companies as a whole that would not be able operate. As we have been noticing there are very few good things that can come out of a government shutdown. On the other hand though, the negatives just pile up as the days go by. A few of there are that many veterans many not receive benefits, financing for small businesses would stop, and federal workers will have their pay delayed. These many not be things that directly impact you, but they are things that keep our economy running and together as a whole and without all the parts that keep it together it could collapse before we even know it.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Treatise of Government written by John Locke had a huge impact on the historical development of the world from 1690 to 1830. In the Second Treatise of Government, John Locke explains that all men are in a “state of nature,” (Lock, p. 35) which is created by god, and in this state they must be equal. Therefore, no man can have a higher authority over the other unless he is “agreeing with other men to join and unite into a community for their comfortable, safe and peaceable living one amongst another,” (Locke, p. 36). Such agreement allows men to create a society that works for them as a whole, thus this society will allow them the “preservation of their property,” (Lock, p. 38).…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays