Preview

Euthanasia: Death and Healthy Mental State

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia: Death and Healthy Mental State
Topic: Euthanasia

Thesis: I think euthanasia should be legalized in the United States because of three points: put an end to the suffering of a human life, let the family’s of the patients be at peace, and so that good doctors do not go to jail just for helping another person move on.

Possible Introduction: Euthanasia also known as assisted suicides; it is often used to put to rest the terminally ill. Terminally ill patients, who have about 12 months to live or so, and at are a healthy mental state, should be able to decide if he should keep on living, or end the pain now.

Main Point 1: Stopping the pain.
Sub-point 1(opposing): It is a sin to commit suicide or take the life of another.
Sub-point 2: By doing the procedure it will end a very painful and agonizing last few months to live.
Sub-point 3: People should have the right to be able to make a decision with more options and this is a big option.

Main Point 2: No more difficulties for the family.
Sub-point 1(opposing): They could influence the ill person towards suicide.
Sub-point 2: Watching a beloved family member suffer for so long is a very hard thing for anyone to go through.
Sub-point 3: keeping someone in the hospital for so long has a huge financial toll on the families.

Main Point 3: Keeping innocent doctors out of jail.
Sub-point 1 (opposing): They are murders for killing these people, and accomplices in suicide.
Sub-point 2: These doctors sole purpose of killing them is to stop their suffering and anguish.
Sub-point 3: The killings are mercy killings; they do it for the patients and the families and shouldn’t be punished for them.

Possible Conclusion: There are some down side to legalizing euthanasia, but I believe the positive out weight the negative by a lot. There can be many more arguments made, but in the end the real decision depends on the person at the end of the day if he wants to go through with it or not.

Reference Page

Gardner, D. B. (2012). Quality

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Associate Ltd (2005) article show that in 1971 a Gp Practitioner murdered 250 patients over a 27 year period in practice. The author believes that the event that occurred in the article contradicts the legal law of rights to life because the Gp deprived 250 patients of unlawful violence and death (Libadmin 2010). It could be argued life is sacred; every individual has a right to preserve their own life and therefore is wrong to end another’s regardless of ethnic or cultural differences (rsrevision 2015). Homicide act (1957) questions the rights of life as it creates a double effect whether it is ethical right if a patient complies with ending their life. For example, patient wanting death through overdose or pain relief, we are unable to know…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keith goes very in depth when talking about payment issues. He states, “Another conflict may arise when a patient needs very expensive ongoing treatments — such as intensive life-support — but has no hope of recovery” (par. 5). He believes that when families demand expensive treatment for futile patients that they cannot pay for, something needs to be…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If a loved one is on life support, should you pull the plug? People have their own fate and that is what is set. In Of Mice and Men, author John Steinbeck depicts the fate of Lennie. But if they can’t control what is going to happen to them than a loved one takes the responsibility to choose whether they want to stop the treatment or keep them on the treatment and making them suffer . This is more of torture then caring for them and helping them. Mercy Killing is a justifiable solution, because it ends someone’s life that is either on the line or who’s ill and there is no way the will make it, meaning they don’t have to suffer.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia means “good death” but today the term is deemed as a merciful action to rid someone of suffering. In many cases we have seen terminally ill patients euthanized active or passive, yet for the sake of my essay I will discuss active euthanasia. End of life issues is a topic many families are faced with everyday more than one likes to imagine; however, imagine that you were a significant other who has a loved one in the hospital suffering from a terminal illness and their pain is unbearable that your loved one has decided to end his life and the subject of euthanasia comes up. What would you do? The…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rough Draft On Euthanasia

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The population of people can be either mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually suffering into pain. We all have different perspectives we can choose to suffer death or have assisted-suicide likewise, snapping your fingers at the instant death. I believe that we do need to euthanasia. I will set reasons why we can be for and against euthanasia. In the hope that, euthanasia it’s needed and follow to have less painful moments.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia has more advantages than disadvantages and actually helps patients and families in numerous ways: it stops the patient from suffering from horrible, chronic diseases and puts an end to their horrific pain. Euthanasia…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many different organizations like the World Health Organization or WHO, are concerned that the nature of the physician - patient relationship will be irrevocably altered for the worse if physicians are given a license to “kill”. (Young). However, advocates for physician assisted suicide like Margaret Battin will argue that physicians whom alone society has entrusted custody of the means of ensuring a good death, have a positive duty to help terminally ill patients in intractable pain who wish to die, which is a duty grounded in the bioethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance (Young).…

    • 2509 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We consider the lethal injection humane compared to old forms of execution such as hanging or firing squad, when in reality, there have been many botched executions involving the lethal injection, and in some states, firing squad, gas chambers, hanging, and electrocution may still be used if the the lethal injection drugs are unavailable (Death, 2011). Because doctors are not ethically allowed to aid in the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for "good death." It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the deferment of medical treatment (Munson, 2012, p. 578). Many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering. Euthanasia has been a long-standing ethical debate for decades in the United States. Active euthanasia is only legal in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and in the United States in the states of Washington, Oregon and Montana (Angell). Several surveys indicate that roughly two thirds of the American public now support physician-assisted suicide, and more than half the doctors in the United States do too (Angell). Active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia matter because they allow the patient or family to relieve them of pain and suffering, and to die with dignity and respect. In this paper I will argue that it is immoral and unethical to deny a patient the right to die and that active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Utilitarianists, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, said, “The right action is the one that, on balance, promotes the most happiness, or the greatest amount of pleasure over pain” (Steinbock p.9), and “Man desires as much happiness and as little suffering as possible, and nothing else is worth desiring” (Fenigsen p.244). I can’t say that I always agree with utilitarianism, but in this case of PAS I convinced that doctors have to satisfy the small amount of terminally ill patients what is very popular in this ethical theory. This way of thinking might be criticized by Kantianism which advocates promoting the happiness not only for few people. Some cases from countries and a few states in USA, where PAS is legal, show that it might happen that satisfying some people doctors could abuse others, but it’s not too much occasions, because the number of people who ask for help is still so small, and the affairs of abuse are rare. For example, the statistic in 2010 in Oregon shows that 96 Oregonians asked their doctors to prescribe a deadly barbiturate which they could ingest causing their own death; 65 of them went ahead and did so. This mode of dying accounts for just 0.2% of death in Oregon (Brennan p. 18). Also the request of PAS was from really terminally ill patients. In the Netherlands and Belgium the large majority of the patient suffered from…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical professionals already have many burdens throughout their medical path, adding the guilt of killing someone to the list is not fair for the healthcare professionals and the family members. Euthanasia is ethically and morally wrong because the doctors have to continue to find possible ways to treat the patient not to give the patient the option of choosing to die. The incident in “Britain with the nurses technically killing the patient could have been avoided” (Fenigsen, “Other People’s Lives: Reflections On Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia”). Although, some people might believe that ending the patient’s pain is ending their suffering, but many fail to realize the actual outcome if euthanasia were to be practiced. For instance, “If terminating life is a benefit, the reasoning goes, why should euthanasia be limited only to those who can give consent? Why need we ask for consent” (ProCon.org, “Top Ten Pros and Cons)”, the slippery slope a reality to…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Death with Dignity

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages

    There is a lot of controversy with the subject of euthanasia. I, for one, was not even aware of the depth of the subject until I started researching for this paper. It has been most…

    • 4342 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics