Preview

Gp Practitioner Killed 250 Patients: Article Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
140 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gp Practitioner Killed 250 Patients: Article Analysis
Associate Ltd (2005) article show that in 1971 a Gp Practitioner murdered 250 patients over a 27 year period in practice. The author believes that the event that occurred in the article contradicts the legal law of rights to life because the Gp deprived 250 patients of unlawful violence and death (Libadmin 2010). It could be argued life is sacred; every individual has a right to preserve their own life and therefore is wrong to end another’s regardless of ethnic or cultural differences (rsrevision 2015). Homicide act (1957) questions the rights of life as it creates a double effect whether it is ethical right if a patient complies with ending their life. For example, patient wanting death through overdose or pain relief, we are unable to know

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to review ways to reduce the cost of health care. This paper will…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical malpractice is when a doctor or another medical professional, such as a nurse or technician, does something or does not do something that causes an injury, harm or death to a patient. In the U.S., experts estimate that about seven in every 1,000 newborns suffer a significant, traumatic birth injury each year due to medical malpractice. Those injuries include, but are not limited to, autism, cerebral palsy, as well as Erb's palsy. According to Donald H. Beskind, a professor at Duke University School of Law, juries are typically influenced by three main factors when deliberating on malpractice cases: the degree to which it is clear who was at fault for the negligence, what money would do to improve the plaintiffs' quality of life, and…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major claim of this editorial, is that legalized doctor-assisted suicide is euthanasia. We are asking for the right to decide though the court system, if an individual’s life is valuable or not. Some may claim we are just hiding or heartless nature and corrupt moral standards to justify our actions.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why it is unjust and unmoral to approve of medical assistants in the pursuit of death, such as suicide if the patients ask for such help? There are two side to every argument, there are some people that believe that is is morally ethical to receive PAS (Physician-Assisted Suicide). Then, of course there’s the opposing side to the debate in which this paper will cover and that side is :The medical practice is PAS is unjust, unmoral and shouldn’t be legalized for the fact the the will of life out powers a moment of misery.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Supporters of assisted suicide believe that this act benefit terminally ill patients by relieving their suffering. This is probably one of the reasons why Netherlands court determined that a physician is allowed to prevent severe and irreversible suffering, even if it reduces patient’s life (Bosshard et al, 2002). The act of assisted suicide or active euthanasia is allowed in Netherlands, Switzerland and Oregon under different conditions and legislations. The situation can be seen differently in places, where by moral and legal discourse; assisted suicide is interpreted as the freedom or right of the individual as in Switzerland and some states of US. From the ethical perspective, patient’s choice of suicide represents an expression of self- determination and while exercising self- determination people take responsibility of their lives and for the kind of person they become. They have a right to refuse the life- sustaining treatment if they don’t want to suffer anymore and according to law, physicians must respect their decisions to forgo life- sustaining treatment that are capable of making their end of life decisions. By refusing life- sustaining treatment, terminally ill people know that they are going to die soon and in order to avoid suffering or pain they ask physicians for assistance to end their…

    • 2855 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I’m at the age in my life where I have seen my family members suffer with extreme pain from a terminal debilitating illness. I know they would prefer death at this point rather than life. My mother who died of cancer, talked about dying and would have liked to stop the suffering, but she elected to deal with the excruciating pain. Or do you not know that your body is a temple or the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from GOD? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify GOD in your body. (1 Corinthians 6; 19-20, Bible) I am not for and opposed to the legalization of voluntary euthanasia for terminally ill patients as administered by physicians. If you have the strength to administer a drug to your body when close to death, I’m opposed to involuntary euthanasia also. I love and have the upmost respect for dignity in dying, and I wish that our Continuations laws and GOD’s laws would let us have control over our last dying wishes, but that is not possible. Our physicians take an…

    • 7882 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for "good death." It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the deferment of medical treatment (Munson, 2012, p. 578). Many view euthanasia as simply bringing relief by alleviating pain and suffering. Euthanasia has been a long-standing ethical debate for decades in the United States. Active euthanasia is only legal in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and in the United States in the states of Washington, Oregon and Montana (Angell). Several surveys indicate that roughly two thirds of the American public now support physician-assisted suicide, and more than half the doctors in the United States do too (Angell). Active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia matter because they allow the patient or family to relieve them of pain and suffering, and to die with dignity and respect. In this paper I will argue that it is immoral and unethical to deny a patient the right to die and that active voluntary and nonvoluntary euthanasia should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2255 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For an unaffected, healthy individual, with death painted as a villain by his subconscious, it is easy to raise a gavel against the legalization of assisted suicide. It is easy for this individual to deny the right to end one’s suffering by citing a variety of aged, insignificant arguments like ancient oaths and biased religious teachings, all in defense of the instinct of his subconscious. However, the debate over assisted suicide is greater than this, and must be considered much more deliberately and meticulously. When one considers justice, autonomy, compassion, and all other necessary factors in the modern assisted suicide debate, it is clear that the practice of physician-assisted suicide is merciful and necessary, and must be a provided right to suffering individuals near the…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctor Assisted Suicide

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Civil rights and law have not always gone hand in hand, that is why it is an extremely refreshing victory for the people of Canada, that active, voluntary euthanasia is soon to be legal. This newfound outlook on doctor-assisted suicide, however, raises the question, what circumstances is euthanasia to be permitted under? Recently, a parliamentary report was published, suggesting 21 recommendations regarding doctor-assisted suicide. Although, all 21 recommendations are important in creating guidelines surrounding euthanasia, there are four particular ones that will be addressed in this work; including, whether or not euthanasia should only be available to those suffering from a terminal illness, whether or…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In her article, “Thank God Hippocrates Was Pagan”, Jennifer Lahl comments that many non-secular arguments against PAS are mostly ignored; however, arguments regarding the fairness of Death with Dignity laws are strong contenders over the debate regarding PAS (40). She questions whether it is right that only those who are terminally ill can legally end their suffering when others cannot since they are not terminal (Lahl 41). Her contention should be acknowledged when considering possible solutions since one of the pro-PAS arguments is that personal autonomy allows for choice. Another article, a critique written by Manne Sjöstrand, Gert Helgesson, Stefan Eriksson, and Niklas Juth, analyzes two anti-PAS points of view (226). Though Sjöstrand et al. do not argue against PAS, their analysis of protesters’ arguments contribute an unbiased overview of justifications the protesters provide regarding their stance (229). One argument considers autonomy to be a prudential value which should not be compromised by actions that prevent future autonomy, such as suicide (Sjöstrand et al. 227). The other, referred to as the Kantian argument, claims that suicide undermines the value of one’s person (Sjöstrand et al. 228). Where supporters of PAS believe personal autonomy grants patients the freedom the commit suicide, protesters believe the same personal autonomy should be…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A terminally ill patient agreeing to physician-assisted suicide is fully aware of a doctor’s job to alleviate any pain possible. Thus, giving consent reveals a great deal of trust between the two. Additionally, opponents insist that terminal patients might be forced to choose assisted suicide due to their health situation. However, the choice of assisted suicide is made in the best interest of the patient and the competent patient can easily decline the offer if they do not wish to accept euthanasia. Therefore, it is evident that the right to assisted suicide is not forced upon any patient, rather an option for those who wish to die in dignity instead of living every day in pain and…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia Nazi Germany

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page

    Doctors’ jobs are to keep people healthy and lively. Their goal is for their patients to be in the best states they can be in. Doctors can do multiple types of procedures and surgeries. One of these procedures is euthanasia, assisted suicide. Euthanasia is controversial topic, but in order for it to happen there must be consent. In Nazi Germany, “euthanasia” was a way of hiding the truth of killings. Medical professionals who “euthanized” thousands of people with disabilities in Nazi Germany are guilty of murder because the patients did not consent, “following orders” is not a defense, and they violated the hippocratic oath.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that doctors main priority should be to help a patient and make sure they get better, not help them end their life. “They rightly seek to eliminate disease and alleviate pain and suffering. They may not, however, seek to eliminate the patient. Allowing doctors to assist in killing threatens to fundamentally corrupt the defining goal of the profession of medicine” (Anderson). While this article focuses on the cons of allowing PAS, it does not necessarily go against the idea of doctors helping their patients, because by allowing them this end of life option they are alleviating pain and suffering to their patients. And doctors are not allowed to offer PAS to any of their patients, so they are not forcing it upon them as an option, the patient must go to them and specifically request it in order to be administered the drugs. “Patients can refuse or doctors can withhold particular treatments that are useless or causing more harm than good. But in deciding that a treatment is useless, we must not decide that a patient is worthless” (Anderson). Patient happiness and health should always be a top priority, and sometimes that means stretching the limitations of the doctor code of conduct to get their patients what they really want, which could in some cases be…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many have questioned the right of physicians to assist someone in dying, when they have taken an oath to save lives instead, but “60% [of physicians] agreed that physician-assisted suicide should be legal…” (Gupta 4). In addition to that, a doctor’s job is to treat a patient with every available technology and medical advancement available, and this includes euthanasia in that pivotal moment when nothing else can be done to extend the patient’s life. Many argue that PAS is “playing God” with human life, but this argument does not hold up because one could just as well argue that keeping a terminally ill patient alive would be doing the exact same. Most people that say this simply do not understand the need of a human to die with dignity and ease.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays