Preview

Ethics In Charlie Gordon's 'Flowers For Algernon'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics In Charlie Gordon's 'Flowers For Algernon'
Lauren Kline
Putman
Hour 4
15 November 2016
Argument Essay
Ethics are a person's standards and their morals. In the story "Flowers for Algernon," Charlie Gordon is a 32-year-old man who has the opportunity to undergo a surgical procedure that will make him smarter. This procedure had already been performed on a laboratory mouse, Algernon, and made him smarter; Charlie will be the first human they try it on. Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smarter.
Charlie's doctors did not act ethically because they just wanted to do it for the fame. Dr. Nemur really wanted to get famous by doing this experiment. His wife really wanted to be married to a well-known famous scientists. Dr. Strauss wanted to wait but Dr. Nemur wanted to rush it. In "Flower's for Algernon," Dr. Nemur says how he wants to hurry up and do the sugery do then he can become well
…show more content…
Towards the end of the story, Dr. Strauss was wondering what they would have done differently so that Algernon would not have died and possibly Charlie. Step two on making ethical decisions is to "predict what will happen in the future (Dobrin)."
Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smarter. His doctors rushed the surgery rather than waiting to get to know Charlie more. Also, his doctor's did not tell him all the risks. Even though he didn’t ask, they still should have told him all of them instead of only a few of them. These are some of the reasons how Charlie's doctors did not act ethically.

Works Cited
Dobrin, Arthur, D.S.W "Five Steps to Better Ethical Decision Making." Psychology Today. Sussex Publishers, LLC, 13 July 2012. Web. 10 November 2016
Siegler, M., and W. Winslade. "Ethics in Medicine." Clinical Ethics. By A. R. Jonsen. 7th ed. N.p.: McGraw-Hill, 2010, N. pag.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the operation, Charlie began to go through a regression. Before the operation he was smarter than he is now that he regrets. “I did a dumb thing today I for got I wasnt in Miss Kinnians class at the adult centen any more like I use to be”(Keyes 243). His regression was so awful that his I.Q decrees to 68. So it was an awful idea…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fremgen, B. F. (2009). Medical law and ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon is a 37 year old man with an IQ of around 68. For his whole life, he has only wanted to be "smart" like everyone else. Charlie has two doctors named Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur. The doctor's want to use Charlie as a test subject to test out a surgery to increase the Human IQ. Ethics are if you really did the "right" thing, so Charlie's doctor's did not act ethically when performing the surgery on Charlie. They had not kept their choices opinion free, they had not put Charlie's social life over science, and they didn't inform Charlie of the potential risks and side effects of the surgery.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon Argument

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charlie Gordon was a determined man. He wanted to learn as much as he could but he was unable to because he was mentally retarded. Meanwhile, his doctors were testing an operation which they wanted to perform on Charlie to make him more intelligent however, he would eventually lose his intelligence and knowledge leading to his death. He would be unable to connect with other people because he would be too smart. Despite these affects, people still believe that the operation preformed on Charlie was ethical. Charlie Gordon's doctors didn't act ethically when they preformed the surgery on Charlie Gordon to make him smarter.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie’s actions are important because they reveal how we can make irrational decisions without knowing the dangers. Charlie was definitely being brave in choosing to do his surgery, for an act to be courageous, it must involve extreme risk or danger, but it should not be for a personal gain, it should be moral. Charlie agreed to do the surgery, but only because it was going to help him become intelligent. Sure, it would’ve helped his doctors improve the procedure for future trials. But, that doesn’t mean they are helping save someone’s life, they are only improving it temporarily. Earlier in the Flowers for Algernon movie, Charlie reveals how foolish and not courageous his actions were when he tried to use the mixer (in the factory he worked at), without proper training. For an act to be courageous, it must not be irrational. The equipment was dangerous, and Charlie could’ve gotten hurt. Later in the Flowers for Algernon movie, Charlie revealed how selfish he was when he stood up against Dr. Strauss in Chicago. It’s understandable that Charlie was standing up for himself, but he embarrassed Dr. Strauss even after all he had done for him. Charlie was acting like the sun, wanting planets (or everyone and everything) to revolve around…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctors lead Charlie blindly, but willingly, into the surgery, using him for research. Charlie knew not what his new found knowledge would bring him; despair, doubt, dread. He knew of the doctor’s ignorance to his feelings and human status, and of the surgery ultimately failing. Due to the devastating events that would transpire, Charlie should have refrained from undergoing the…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, The doctors shouldn’t have chosen Charlie Gordon because they resisted in obeying the Ethics of Fieldwork in the Belmont Report. According to the Belmont Report,” the requirement to acknowledge autonomy and the requirement to protect those with diminished autonomy.” A person with an IQ of 68 has extremely diminished autonomy or intelligence. In the report it says to “Protect those with diminished autonomy.” Charlie was not protected from the harm the world has…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, when he saw life differently, it was in a bad way, and he then realised he didn’t have any friends. According to the text, Charlie said, “ It’s a funny thing I never knew that Joe and Frank and the others like to have me. Now I know what it means to pull a Charlie Gordon. I’m ashamed.” (Keyes 231). Readers might also argue that the surgery was a good idea because, he remembered his childhood. However, when he remembered his past he felt very abandoned. For example, as his parents said, “ He’s got to be sent away. I don’t want him in the house any more…” If you had the offer for this surgery, and saw the emotionally inhuman pain it causes, wouldn’t you say…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The following is an excerpt from the book Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine, 4th Edition. Copyright permission to reproduce this excerpt has been generously granted by McGraw-Hill. We encourage you to read further in this useful resource book, available now in the revised 7th Edition (2010). . Albert R. Jonsen, Mark Siegler, and William J. Winslade, Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., .…

    • 3899 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie’s choice to opt for the operation results in him getting what he wished for, his IQ triples for a good few months and, then going down to an all time low. Resulting in him losing the ability to take care of himself. Before operated on, Charlie’s IQ was at a intellectual disability level, and his doctors make him write in his journal. In Charlie’s journal entries he writes about how he feels, thinks, and his opinions on other people. After the…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie's doctors didn’t ask themselves some of the questions in "Ethics in Medicine". If Gordon's doctors didn’t ask themselves these question and did not act upon them, then that shows why the doctors didn’t act ethically. One of the question that was asked was that…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paul, Dr. Richard., & Elder, Dr. Linda. (2003). Ethical Reasoning. Dillon Beach, California: The Foundation for…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death and Dying

    • 3240 Words
    • 13 Pages

    We all make ethical choices throughout our lives. These may not necessarily be big medical choices but day-to-day choices for example our diet and if we choose to eat meat. Peter Singer is a moral philosopher who has written…

    • 3240 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    xplain the quotation and how it relates to the reason you think Charlie was or was not right to have the operation. (This is…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effective Leadership Paper

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The role of ethics when it comes to the decision-making process is developed with the leaders' own personal experiences, morals and values. When a leader is face to make ethical decisions, leaders rely on a many sources which are three common approaches such as utilitarianism theory, libertarianism theory and Kant’s ethical theory (Lonergan, 2016, p. 9).…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays