Preview

Essay On How Did The Liberal Reforms 1906 Meet The Needs Of British People

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1589 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On How Did The Liberal Reforms 1906 Meet The Needs Of British People
To what extent did the Liberal reforms 1906, meet the needs of the British people? In the 20th Century poverty was a serious cause which was blamed on the individual themselves because of their carelessness and laziness. Before 1900’s the needs of people grew as there was many problems such as no health care, education, social services or unemployment benefit available at all provided. Families began to grow while people came seriously ill from lack of food and poor living conditions. If you were poor and faced serious money problems then you were faced with finding your own way out of it without any help from the government. Charles Booth and Seebohm Rowntree were social commentators that set out to prove that it was indeed the fault of the individual who faced poverty. They were both shocked to find that poverty had causes …show more content…
Some historians believed the government only took little action against poverty as socials commentators Booth and Rowntree showed it wasn’t the individuals fault. Winston Churchill summed up the aim of the liberals as he said This means that the liberal government provided very little help to the lower class so that they could help themselves escape poverty. Historians alleged that it could be estimated that as much as one third of the population would have been below the poverty line before the reforms and people feel no other government could have handled the issue of poverty any better at that time which shows the liberals were as successful as they could be towards the five social groups. However The Liberal Government largely focused on specific difficulties in society but failed to introduce solutions to deal with issues such as housing or National Health Service that affects everyone. This shows that the Liberal reforms 1906-1914 were only successful on a small scale as it was unable to improve the poverty levels of the whole

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How successful were the Liberal government in years 1906-1914 in bringing about political and institutional reform (24)…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal’s victory in the 1906 was a very significant one due to how they won it with such an overwhelming majority; it was the biggest electoral victory since 1832. In the 1890’s the liberals were suffering from a crisis identity and they were lacking in money and morale. In the 1906 election the liberals won 49.4% of the vote and that amounted to 399 seats which was such a large margin compared to in 1900 where 45% of the vote was only 183 seats. There are four main reasons arguably why the Liberals won the1906 election and these are through Conservative faults such as the massacre in the Boer war. The education act in 1902 and Chamberlain’s tariff reform campaign also lost the conservatives a lot of support, which meant people turned to liberals just due to disliking the conservatives. The most important reason was Arthur Balfour getting involved and not making the right decisions for the conservatives and losing a lot of the voters they had before. The liberals also used a very negative campaign in order to get voters to realise the flaws in the conservative’s ideals and make them vote for the liberals just through dislike of the other parties.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal party led by Henry Campbell Bannerman won a landslide victory over the conservatives in the 1960 general election. They won 377 seats giving then an enormous majority of 84 over all other parities combined. Bannerman retired in 1908 and his successor Herbert Asquith, who brought about an increasing shift towards reform, originating from the initiatives of Lloyd George the Board of Trade and Winston Churchill the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Both of these characters were very influential in the idea of New Liberalism. New Liberalism was completely committed to radical, social reforms. This is exactly what the government tried to enforce between the years 1906-1914 and the ‘lib-labs’ (radical liberals) passed several reforms to try and liberalise Britain from the previous conservative rule.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the period 1896 – 1915, the condition of Italy was relatively in a terrible state in many ways with various political, economic and social problems that hindered the country’s progress. Italy’s Liberal Governments during this period were generally very unsuccessful in dealing with these inherited and growing problems clearly contributing to the end of Liberalism in Italy. More so, the Liberal Government under the rule of Giolitti saw Italy progressing in some circumstances regarding the socio-economic concerns. Nonetheless, it is very comprehensible that the Liberal Governments lacked solving the problems that they faced.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Post war Britain was in shambles. Altogether, 50-70 million people were dead as a result of World War 2 and 33% of all houses were lost in the war. However, Labour shocked Britain when they overtook the Conservative Party in the 1945 elections. Historians argue Churchill’s laid back attitude was the cause of the war leaders’ failure in the elections. Attlee passed many reforms during his reign. The NHS, the National Insurance Act, Industrial Injury Act, National Assistance Act and the Family Allowance Act are some of the reforms passed. I will expand on the key reforms and highlight the most important reform passed in government in between 1945-1950.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a growing awareness of poverty in Britain, especially in London in early 1900s. According to the research of Charles Booth in London, there were 25% of people that were living under abject poverty and over 35% of people were living under the poverty line of 0.90-1.05 pounds per week for a family with 3 children. The situation was severe and that was not only happening in London, but other cities as well. According to Seebhom Rowntree’s studies, there were 28% of people that lives in York could not afford to buy clothing and food. Social reform was definitely needed. At that time, some other new liberalism were arising, they aimed to give out minimum living standard for needy families. In contrast, the conservative was not doing anything good and the Education Act that did not please the society. As a result, a party that was providing more benefit to citizens and poverty became more successful and gained more voter’s…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals made many social reforms which were not necessarily directly helpful to the individual issues at hand but they did create grounds for the welfare estate to be built upon and highlighted the areas which needed attention for a better minimum quality of life. Areas focused on were free meals and health checks at schools, pensions and insurances. For example, the 1906 School Meals Act allowed children to have a free daily meal. This was effective in 1914 as by then, 14 million were receiving the free meals which duly led to a better economy however the negatives outweighed the positives as the issue with having the act voluntary until 1912 meant that over half of the authorities didn’t provide meals. Furthermore, proving eligibility was very difficult so there were many errors which occurred with the system. Rather similarly, Old Aged Pensioners couldn’t receive their money due to identity proofing issues. Household issues were ignored which was one of the Liberal’s negatives however, this is without taking into account that only so many areas could have been focused on. Although the Liberals never catered for the needs of all people, their reforms managed to always bring some improvement into areas of health, education and the future of citizens, no matter how poor in places they were. The Liberal Social Reforms did improve the lives of the British citizens to some extent, the main achievement being that the existence of the reforms themselves allowed to building of the welfare estate which is a factor that makes Britain as strong as it is today.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent were the reforms of Gladstone’s first ministry limited in their success? [50 marks]…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Perhaps, the most ‘revolutionary’ reform that Labour introduced was the NHS. Although there was liberal influence and consensus between the parties over welfare, the clear historical fact remains that Atlee’s Labour party introduced this. The public were in dire need of better healthcare – especially those who couldn’t afford it. Unfortunately, the majority of the population after the war were still living on a very small income and not many people in society could afford health services.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The other way you can measure the attitudes of the state towards the poor is to measure the changing attitudes of the state towards the rich. In order to fund this social reform, the Liberals placed a higher taxation rate on the rich. This is significantly different from 1834 when the ‘less eligibility’ principle decreased the poor rate for landowners who saw it to be burdensome prior to the New Poor Law. The poor were no longer being penalised on account of appeasing the richer…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labour Reforms 1945-1951

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When the war ended in 1945, the Labour Government, led by Clement Atlee, were faced with tackling numerous problems that existed in Britain. Their aim was to meet the welfare needs of the British people who, during the war, got used to support provided by the government. In 1942, a Civil Servant and an experienced worker on social welfare named William Beveridge constructed a report which would go on to become the basis for the Labour reforms. By 1951, Labour had introduced many different reforms aiming to tackle the problems that faced Britain. The Beveridge Report identified what is known as the 5 giants; these include disease, want, squalor, idleness and ignorance. Arguably the most important and successful were the acts introduced to tackle disease and want, but some may disagree. Nevertheless, it is clear that the Labour government met most of the needs of the British people between 1945-1951.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 19th century the attitude of the British Governments towards poverty was ‘laissez-faire’ meaning that the government did not interfere with people’s lives. They believed that people were ‘’too lazy’’ to work therefore they should look after themselves. Booth and Rowntree did surveys in the 19th century about the causes of poverty in the British cities such as London and York. Booth and Rowntree were not the main reason for the Liberal Government of 1906-1914 introducing their social welfare since the Boer War was more important as it made the government aware of the unfit population across Britain. However, there were also other factors that had an influence in the reforms introduced such as New Liberalism, Political Advantage, Municipal…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During 1906-12 when the Liberal Party were in power started the Liberal Reforms, which were several programmes with the intent to help British citizens living in poverty. There is a debate amongst historians whether or not the Liberal Reforms were effective and helped the people living in poverty. The quote from the historian Martin Pugh suggests that the reforms were not introduced to create a welfare state but only focusing on solving specific problems that poor people have faced. There are other interpretations that further support Pugh’s interpretations and there are interpretations that go against Pugh’s interpretation. There were acts of parliament that were trying to help the elderly and the main one was Old Age Pension in 1908 which…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1890 and 1915, progressive reforms swept the nation, with some leading to improvements for society. Although some of these reforms led to radical behavior, either for the reform or against it, most were civil. The areas of most concern for the reforms were industrial conditions, urban life, and politics.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main issues to be dealt were social security (guaranteed income), medical services, housing and education. They were all achieved by the passing of the following legislation, National Insurance act 1945, National Insurance act 1946 focusing on family allowance to the people who were sick, unemployed, retired. The National Health Service act 1948 focusing on providing free medical support .The Education Act 1944 (education reform) focusing on a basic education for all, However raising a question of what is the point in having National Insurance benefits, free medial care, proper housing and wise schooling, if there were no jobs? Marwick claims, it was the fundamental assumption of the war and post war period that all the different pieces of welfare legislation would be backed up by an economic policy deliberately designed to create jobs and avoid…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays