Preview

Epideictic And Deliberative Rhetoric

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1212 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Epideictic And Deliberative Rhetoric
Argumentative Essay

Today rhetoric such as, epideictic and deliberative, is a part of language that is often given a negative connotation. It is usually perceived that corrupt politicians and sales persons use rhetoric in arguments to conceal the truth. In actuality, epideictic and deliberative appeal are rhetoric that should be seen as an important part of language. These kinds of rhetoric can help communicate ones point across and create something easily understood by the audience. Language is powerful and can be used to transform ideas and thoughts. Epideictic and deliberative appeal are useful tools that makes use of the power of language to more efficiently inform others of what we think, or persuade others of certain ideas. However,
…show more content…
Unlike deliberative rhetoric, which deals with persuasion and decision-making, epideictic rhetoric mainly aims at praise or blame. If speaking in terms of praise, the speaker will try to make the audience desire to know the man or object of such excellence after hearing the speech. But in terms of blame, the speaker attempts to make the audience know the man or object in order to avoid such evil. Aside from deliberative rhetoric, Roosevelt also utilizes epideictic appeal in his speech. In the opening of his speech, Roosevelt states "no matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people, in their righteous might, will win through to absolute victory”(Roosevelt). Roosevelt employs epideictic rhetoric in this quote to give the American the citizens a feeling of confidence. By doing this, Roosevelt unites America under this feeling of needed triumph, and gives them incentive for revenge for the atrocities committed by Japan. Roosevelt continues to do this when he states “our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us” (Roosevelt). Again, Roosevelt uses epideictic rhetoric to make Pearl Harbor a day to remember. Roosevelt wants the American people to have this atrocity as a lasting impression of the crimes that Japan committed against America. Being able to recognize the attitude that should be felt towards Pearl Harbor was a crucial part of the unity that occurred during World War II in America. Roosevelt successfully used epideictic rhetoric to blame the empire of Japan for the terrors of Pearl Harbor, which lead to a national unity under one common enemy. When looking at speeches like President Roosevelt’s and Senator Taft’s, it is often argued that there is no need to be able to distinguish between the epideictic and deliberative rhetoric. Admittedly,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Attack on Pearl Harbor, inflammatory language is used as a persuasive technique to try and get the citizens of the United States angered and mournful about the bombing of pearl harbor. The point of writing this speech is to persuade Americans to support the war, and that there was a good reason to go to war. Also, he wanted to convince congress to declare war, which minutes later they did. He uses hate filled inflammatory language to appeal to the audience’s emotion, calling it an “unprovoked and dastardly” (Roosevelt 2) attack. By saying this, Roosevelt hopes to make it appear that the bad guys are the Japanese, which they are. He wishes to arouse the American citizens and get them to support his reasons to go to…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major writing assignment in Unit 2 is a rhetorical analysis essay. You will explain why an audience would or would not find your primary text persuasive. You will use information learned from your secondary text to show key information about the context (the audience, the circumstances, or the speaker). By teaching you to think critically about audience and argumentation, this analysis will prepare you to write your persuasive essay in Unit 3.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1967, Robert L. Scott started a seminal debate within the rhetoric community with his essay, “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic.” His argument – rhetoric is epistemic - has been analyzed and/or criticized by many scholars. Scott himself followed up in 1976 with an article titled, “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic: Ten Years Later” in order to address some of these concerns, and add to his original thoughts. Despite this follow-up, authors still continue criticize and defend his work. This essay will focus on three responses in particular, each focusing on a different aspect of Scott’s argument, in order to prove that rhetoric is in fact epistemic. First, Brumett’s, Three Meanings of Epistemic Rhetoric (1979) will examine three possible meanings…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roosevelt, Franklin D. "Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation". / "Declaration of War" speech". American Rhetoric. 21 Oct. 2006. .…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rhetorical situation is only part of a broader system of analysis developed by the Rhetorician Loyd Bitzer, known as The Bitzerian Method. In this method a text is broken down into several components. First their must always be an exigence, or issue that needs resolving. Furthermore the exigence is only rhetorical when it can be solved in a positive way using persuasion. So an exigence is not merely just a problem, it is a very unique issue that has the potential to be resolved if only the right people can be persuaded to take action. Understanding that an exigence is only rhetorical when the solution lies in persuasion translates to the the second component of Bitzer’s method which is the audience. In this case the audience is not defined to mean a group of people passively receiving a verbal message. Rather in the context of Bitzer’s method an audience means the group of people with the power to initiate change, the group that must be targeted to resolve the exigence. The third and final component of Bitzer’s…

    • 2233 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People did not think that we are going to have another World War after the Great War had ended until Hitler’s first invasion of Poland. Germany, Italy, and Japan joined on one side to fight against the Allied powers. In Asia, Japan wanted to expand their territories so they start invading other countries included China and Philippines. The Japanese admiral saw the U.S Navy Fleet in Hawaii as a threat to Japan. Therefore, on a Sunday of December 7, 1941, thousands of Japanese airplanes and battle ships attacked Pearl Harbor killed thousands of American lives. As a result, President Franklin Roosevelt gave a speech of “Pearl Harbor Address to the Nation” not only to the Congress, but also to all Americans the next day to urge Congress for a declaration on Japan and assemble American people to support the war effort. This speech was an effective speech due to the used of three elements of parallelism, pathos, and ethos.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric it something used all over the world and most are not even aware of the world. People use rhetoric so often it become second nature for most in everyday life even children use rhetoric to get what they want. Rhetoric is the use of world in persuasive speech, and writing. Letting the recipient of the speech or paper persuade the emotions or believes sway common reasoning to what author or speaker wants. When someone is using persuasion they need to use three basic principles Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. With the videos provided an in depths look on how rhetoric use all three of these principals.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Contemporary Use of Rhetoric

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Aristotle believed that rhetoric is an art that could, and should, be studied and that good rhetoric is not only persuasive but also ethical. I agree with Aristotle’s claim that good rhetoric is not only persuasive but it is ethical. Rhetoric is value neutral in that the principles of rhetoric are not necessarily moral or immoral; it is dependent on how they are utilized. I believe it is unethical when good rhetorical principles are used to persuade the ignorant or the unwary of things which are against their best interest and is used to force the beliefs of the hegemonic group of our society upon other less powerful cultural groups. While many believe public engagement in rhetoric has been geared towards establishing absolute truth applicable to the universal appeals of human nature, I believe the principles of rhetoric are used in this modern era unethically to perpetuate certain dominant ideologies in order to maintain social hierarchies. By analyzing modern media and applying the theories and discoveries of the scholars we have discussed throughout the quarter such as, Nietzsche, Habermas, and Fraser it is apparent how language is currently used unethically in attempt to rhetorically persuade the public.…

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Situation

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When one hears the word Rhetorical Situation, they may tend to be confused, because Rhetoric theory isn’t nessacarily a situation, but much more complex than that. If you look at the word Rhetoric, it’s function is ultimately to perform a task by altering or changing the world we live in. rhetoric, can be seen as a manner of changing reality, not directly by the energy of oneself to others, but by creating discourse, in which causes, or persuades others to become so engaged that they facilitate change. In is apperant that rhetoric is always persuasive and convincing. Rhetorical situation can be beheld as a natural perspective of persons, events, objects, and relations. There are three different construients of any rhetorical situation which are exigence, Audience and contraints. Exigence is a sense of urgency or the obstacle that is in need of being overcame and completed. An exigence is rhetorical when it is capable of positive modification which requires discourse or can be assisted by discourse. The audience is whom the individual is trying to sway, and will greatly affect, their dialect, content, and overall angle. Contraint have the ability to limit decisions and actions needed to modify the exigence. Standard sources of constraint include beliefs, attitudes, documents, facts, traditions, images, interests, and motives. A speaker at a democratic rally wouldn’t share their favorable views for the republican party. Likewise a monologue for a talk show would not run longer than five minutes.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Rhetoric

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetoric persuades an audience with the usage of diction with the intention of articulating something in an eloquent manner; by using specific diction, words and phrases can be perceived a certain way. However, effective rhetorical speech cannot be accomplished with words alone, but with the way it’s spoken. It is important to consider the type of audience you are talking to in order to achieve the sole purpose of rhetoric.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric And Writing

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When someone hears the phrase “Rhetoric & Writing,” one might think of speech, as well as the different forms of the written word, such as fiction, autobiography, poetry, etc., but persuasion is, from my point of view, the backdrop of Rhetoric and Writing (Harmon, 411). We, as authors, or even interdisciplinarians, must present our ideas to the world that seduces them to vacate their identity for a short period of time.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has been argued that corporate partnerships are a necessity for cash-strapped schools. It has also been argued that schools should give their students an environment free from ads and corporate influence. There are both pros and cons of corporate sponsorship for schools but the negative aspect of having advertisements presented in schools outweighs the positive.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art of argumentation is not an easy skill to acquire. Many people might think that if one simply has an opinion, one can argue it effectively, and these folks are always surprised when others don't agree with them because their logic seems so correct. Additionally, writers of argumentation often forget that their primary purpose in an argument is to "win" it--to sway the reader to accept their point of view. It is easy to name call, easy to ignore the point of view or research of others, and extremely easy to accept one's own opinion as gospel, even if the writer has not checked his or her premise in a couple of years, or, as is the case for many young writers, never questioned the beliefs inherited from others.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    you know you are right, you will always be right, and everyone should agree. Argumentative speeches are different Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the best argumentative speecher's of the 20th century. he argued that all men are created equal. Argumentative essays are essays in which the author uses facts to convince the reader of his/her view regarding the issue Argumentative essays use facts and opinions.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counter Argument

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The argumentative essay states and supports one position about a debatable topic. The position is supported with evidence, reasons and examples relevant to the point being argued. For example, “Advertisers perform a useful service to the community” would be an argumentative essay.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays