Preview

English Colonial Settlements: The Struggle Between Native Americans And Indian Nations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English Colonial Settlements: The Struggle Between Native Americans And Indian Nations
Land represents a quintessential issue between Native Americans and Europeans. This has been true since Columbus’ discovery and the era of Spanish exploration, invasion, and settlement. During the latter periods of Native American history we observe how English colonization and then the birth and growth of the United States affects the Indian Nations. During this period we mark how two divergent societies value land differently and the disparities resulting in conflict and Indian subjugation.
The English Colonial Settlements initially viewed the land similarly as the aboriginal Indian inhabitants in a particular way. The land was the provider of sustenance to both. The early English Colonies sought refuge in the land, which was unlike the
…show more content…
At first there was an aggressive unfettered Indian land grab and then ongoing assaults on natural resources residing on the ever-dwindling Indian lands. The stereotypes of American Indians as inferior beings with limited intellect, or bloodthirsty warriors, or lacking acceptable morals initially justified Colonial expansionism under pretense of ordained religiosity. Indian resistance to relentless encroachment was often confronted with rebellion and the question of sovereignty was debated. The establishment of the United States and the subsequent 1823 Supreme Court ruling of Johnson v. McIntosh made clear the government accepted that early Europeans had rights to all Indian lands by having discovered the lands. Having previously defeated the British and securing American independence allowed the victor’s title be transferred to the United States. It is from this point that “Conquest by Law” guides the history of land possession between Native Americans and …show more content…
The national conquest gained a legal endorsement to empower government separate Indian Nations from their land as assured in 1831 by the Supreme Court’s Cherokee Nation v. Georgia ruling that minimized Indian sovereignty to that of being a dominated people at best classified as dependents of their United States government guardian.
In 1832 the Worcester v. Georgia ruling held that the aforementioned Cherokee treaties and the Trade and Intercourse Acts passed since 1790 did recognize Indian Nations as political entities with authority within its borders. It now excluded States from having any jurisdictional power over Indian Nations. Though this ruling established Indians as autonomous from States it put in motion what would later become Congressional plenary power and it marks the beginning of federally exercised relocation to feed American land hunger and later efforts to manage “the Indian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When English colonists first arrived to the New World, the Native American Indians were curious yet kind to these “white men”. However, as time passed the colonists’ hunger for more land grew stronger. They began to take advantage of the Indians by signing treaties that were not completely understood by the natives. Consequently, a brave Indian took upon the initiative to protect their properties. Tecumseh, leader of the Shawnee, began his quest to put a stop to American greed by uniting the molested tribes to defend their lands.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is however surprising, when you know and understand the treatment of the Native Americans by the government of the United States, to recognize that both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States contain clauses that recognize Indian peoples as foreign powers and as such the dealing of these nations must adhere to policies put forth in both (Jaimes, p141). Following these influential documents, with yet another powerful…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changes in the Land

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Did the Indians have a concept of land ownership? If so, what was it? What did it mean to own the land for an Indian?…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780’s the US began urging the Cherokees to stop hunting and their traditional ways of life and to instead learn about how to live, farm, and worship like Christian Americans. Despite everything the white people in Georgia and other southern states that abutted the Cherokee Nation refused to accept the Cherokee people as social equals and urged their political representatives to take the Cherokees land. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803 gave Thomas Jefferson the chance to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shoshone Human Rights

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The difference of the definitions of landownership between the United States and the Shoshone greatly shines in the reading as it portrays that for the Shoshones, “people do not have a dominating relationship with the land, but rather have responsibilities to protect the land areas from which they originate” (Fishel 622) while the government believes that the land is “a resource for human consumption and dominion” (Fishel 622). The difference in perspective about the land is one of the underlying factor regarding the dispute between the groups not only about the rights on whom the land belongs to, but also the way the land is being…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicts over land developed between Native Americans and the settlers. The Natives took up most of the land because they moved from place to place. They did not have a set territory. They were like “foxes and wild beasts…” Colonist said “so it is lawful now to take a land which none useth; and make use of it.” Europeans believed that land was essential for a society to progress. On the other hand, Native American viewed the land as a resource to be used and left unchanged. Because of this fight over land and misunderstanding of cultures, colonists justified wars against the Native Americans.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marshall Trilogy

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the State of Georgia, it was against the State law to preach without a license. Mr. Worcester was arrested and confined in jail were he sued the State of Georgia appealing that Georgia did not have power to inforce activity on Tribal lands. Marshalls Court agreed with Mr. Worcester affirming that the Cherokee Nation is a distinctive community on its own territory and that Georgia could inforce this State law. Again, this decision recognized that the United States Government, not the states have authority over tribes with inherent…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marshall arrived to the conclusion that the Cherokees were not a “foreign state” under the meaning of this Constitution because “foreign states” is a general term used in the American Constitution. Also the Indians are not foreign to the United States and cannot comprehend the Indian tribes with the word. The significance of the “domestic dependent nation” status with regard to constitutional rights of the Cherokee Nation is that the tribes can occupy a territory to which they declare an independent will, “which must take effect in point of possession when their right of possession ceases”.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States recognized Indiana tribes as separate nations of people entitled to their own lands that could only be obtained from…

    • 3248 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    M’Intosh. The court ruled that Native Americans had a basic right to live on their tribal lands. However, the court decided that these lands were really the property of the U.S. government. The state of Georgia tried to put an end to Cherokee tribal government.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forced Federalism

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The book also demonstrates that long-term solutions to threatening rich Indian discrimination does not arise from matching the lobbying and political behavior of other U.S. citizens, instead the strength comes from within the indigenous nations to protect their sacred homeland and keeping their cultural and political forms of authority. During the era of forced federalism, the nations were obligated to deal with states as equals, which weakened the exclusive and historic relationship with the federal government. The…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposition calling for equal rights and political democracy of the inhabitants of America were in confutation with the principles calling for the US to follow colonial principles of the European empires that had begun to invade North America in the late 1400s. The colonies that had revolted against British rule in the late 1700s had continued the expansion of settlements and political incorporation that had been practiced since the founding of colonies at Jamestown and Plymouth. The proposal of Indian Removal debated in the US Congress was a straightforward expression of that same expansionism, which dispensed with the past policies of the US that had combined expansion with treaty negotiations that had the form of a meeting and agreements of equals, and proclamations of Indian rights and sovereignty. There was a national campaign developed in support of the Indian resistance, particularly from the Cherokee, that involved diatribes and petitions, public meetings and Congressional debates. The opposition to Removal was advancing principles that in effect called for the US to develop practical policy that was in line with its past proclamations that upheld its treaty commitments to the Indian communities.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the seventeenth century, Native Americans greeted European settlers with much excitement. They regarded settlers as strange, but were interested to learn about the new tools and weapons Europeans brought with them. The native people were more than accommodating to the settlers, but as time passed, Europeans took advantage of their generosity. “Once these newcomers disembarked and began to feel their way across the continent, they forever altered the course and pace of native development.” Native Americans and Europeans faced many conflicts due to their vast differences in language, religion and culture. European settlers’ inability to understand and respect Native Americans lead to many struggles that would eventually erupt into violent warfare.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays