Preview

End Justifies the Means

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
688 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
End Justifies the Means
Does The End Justify The Means?

First, let's try to understand the sense in which the word "justifies" is used in the familiar statement that "the end justifies the means." After that we can consider the problem you raise about whether it is all right to employ any means - good or bad - so long as the end is good.

When we say that something is "justified," we are simply saying that it is right. Thus, for example, when we say that a college is justified in expelling a student who falls below a passing mark, we are acknowledging that the college has a right to set certain standards of performance and to require its students to meet them. Hence, the college is right in expelling the student who doesn't.
In most societies, killing a human being is seen as a bad thing to do. But what do you do when a country declares war against you? The "end" in this case is the end of the war. If you do nothing and stick to your moral grounds, you will be destroyed, but the war will be over. If you take up arms to defend yourself, you are violating your moral code for the sake of stopping the war..
An enterprise can succeed only if it has a goal. To achieve that goal an effective method should be adopted. The method can be harmless with no violence in it. Or it can be hard and cruel which calls for a lot of violence. In both cases the goal is the same. Only the method of achieving it is different. The proverb, a very disputable one, means that if the goal is good the methods adopted for achieving it do not matter. It can be good or bad. The Florentine statesman, Machiavelli, in his book THE PRINCE advocated this doctrine. According to him, it is justifiable to go to any extent for achieving a good cause. It may be necessary to use violence sometimes. It will be harmful to some people. But all that can be justified if the goal is good. Some great Indian leaders and thinkers like Gandhi have opposed this doctrine. According to them it is not only necessary that goal should be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Is murder justifiable

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    No, murder should not be justifiable under any circumstances. There is no reason for anyone to purposely or accidently do something to cost another person their life. There are numerous occasions where people perform this terrible act upon another being, but the taking of another person’s life is never alright whether it is a cold blooded act, a stupid avoidable accident, or an act of anger and revenge.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justification. Defined as the act of justifying something. To serve as an acceptable reason or excuse for our actions, based on actual or believed information. Throughout the history of not only the modern world, but certainly back to the "barest essentials of reason" our species have made decisions that have effectively shaped our world into what it is today. Or have not. The judgments made in the past may also have been relatively insignificant to a larger picture, but would still be important in one persons or a group of people's day-to-day life. Either way, choices made in any way, shape, or form, are based on what the decision maker believes to be true or morally right. Timothy Findley displays the abovementioned opinion-based judgments in the novel The Wars. From the background behind the novel, to the ending scene of the main character being burned to the ground in a flaming barn, many choices are made. Whether large and important or small and insignificant, Mr. Findley asks us as readers and as humans to look into ourselves to uncover the reasoning behind the choices, as well as our own actions and the actions of our leaders. The justification for most of the aforementioned incidents in The Wars can be classified under 3 broad-based ideas: safety, self-interest or the moral/general good.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dirty Harry Problem

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "When and to what extent does the morally good end warrant or justify an ethically, politically, or legally dangerous means for its achievement?" This is the question posed by Carl Klockars about the ever growing Dirty Harry problem in society. This has become a focus of mass media and even a source of profit. The name itself comes from a Hollywood movie staring Clint Eastwood. Well if you believe the movies then the answer is never, for along as the bad guy gets what he deserves than the means didn't matter. But at some point doesn't a line have to be drawn?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings must never be treated simply as "means" to the accomplishment of some defined "end." The end does not justify the means. The author finds this to be an accurate reading of his ethic views.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "In the deeper layers of the modern consciousness, all means are unlawful, every attempt to succeed is an act of aggression, leaving one alone and guilty and defenseless among enemies: one is punished for success."…

    • 1567 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    During World War II and the War on Terror, there are many moral issues. One of the questions that people ask regarding the wars is: is reasoning for going to war justified? On December…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justified killing

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is there such a thing as justified killing? Many would argue that the killing of another individual is by far one of the worse crimes that can be committed. Though under certain circumstances such as capital punishment, or to kill in self-defense, justified killing is okay. These options are only acceptable if there is no viable alternative to doing so. Everyone has the right to live, and once someone decides to kill another individual then they should lose that right. They don’t deserve to have the right of life if they want to take the life of an innocent person. Many believe that it is not right to kill someone, but if you are protecting yourself or someone else in need of protection then it is okay, thus making the killers actions acceptable. However, I personally believe that there are better alternatives than death to resolving conflicts.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, arguably the finest political theorist of his time, wrote in his famous work “The Prince” that a ruler use any methods available to him to maintain stability, for even though some methods might seem abusive and purely attempts toward staying in power, in reality they benefit the people because the ruler manages to maintain stability which is all the people could ask for. If another country is about to attack yours and your people are at risk, would you even hesitate in bribing the other country's ruler or diplomat to prevent escalation? True, the ethics are questionable, but being that the ends are so positive, it would be futile to look at it otherwise. Plain and simple, the means are irrelevant if the ends are positive enough to trump them. Machiavelli defends these conclusions using both explicit and implicit language.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In analyzing justifications, be sure to take account not just of the immediate historical context,…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Pacifism

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Human beings have been fighting with each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it. The Ethics of War begins by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but there can be situations when war may be catastrophic. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment or commonly known as the death penalty is the punishment of ending one’s life for a serious crime that they committed. The death penalty serves both as a good consequence and as a deterrent or prevention for future crimes. Capital Punishment addresses crimes that simply cannot be repaid, or compensated for. If one were to rob a store the thief can payback the amount that was stolen, in fact, under biblical law from the bible the criminal would then be tasked to work for the person he or she robbed from until the debt itself was repaid several times over the amount that was stolen. And with the criminals dedication to such a payback would then be freed and by his honorable labor be restored to a position a trust once more. As for the murder no matter how much or how hard he is to work he cannot bring back life from the dead, he can never again regain society’s trust. His victim or victims will remain dead.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When is war acceptable? That is the question that the Just War theory (jus bellum iustum) attempts to answer. Guided by an evolving set of criteria, this tradition attempts to provide a framework by which the both the reasons for a war and the combatants' behavior may be judged to be ethical and morally justifiable. This theory or doctrine, has roots in both philosophical and historical contexts, having been shaped by conventions and rules observed through ages of war as well as the thoughts of philosophers of those same ages. These principles are divided into two parts: 'the right to go to war' (jus ad bellum), which concerns itself with whether it is justifiable…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Could you be justified in taking one innocent life in order to save the lives of many?…

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    *Never treat people simply as means to an end but always at the same time as ends in themselves…

    • 1571 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The end justifies the means” was expressed in Truman's decision to drop the atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Truman wanted to drop the bombs on military bases because the Japanese attacked America. He saw this as a more timely end to this war and retaliation back at the Japanese. “The end justifies the means” in this case is relevant to today by Truman's decision (or means) to drop the bomb was ended with 90,000 residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki dying instantly. The deaths (end) was justified by his decision (means).…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays