Preview

Emily C Mckenna Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Emily C Mckenna Summary
Schools are now starting drug testing students because of the rate of drug use that’s under the influence. Drug testing in schools will put the students’ rights and the schools’ money at risk. The article ¨Presumed Guilty¨ by Emily C. Mckenna explains that drug testing is against people's constitutional rights. One reason why drug tests put students rights at risk is because that it´s invading the students privacy. Emily C. Mckenna introduces us with the price for drug tests for each student and about constitutional rights. According to Emily C. Mckenna, she states, “ But I do have something to protect my constitutional rights.” (Emily C. Mckenna 77) . The constitutional rights show that drug tests do not have the right to invade people's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill” involves students and their Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that citizens are free from unreasonable search and seizure from the government. However, school administration (an extension of government) does have the power to implement searches and seizures that may be outside of the constitutional scope in order to maintain good order and discipline in the school. This is evidenced by the Supreme Court case New Jersey vs. T.L.O where the Supreme Court ruled that requiring schools to obtain warrants for searches would interfere with the swift and informal disciplinary procedures needed in schools. However, the Supreme Court also stated that there must be reasonable grounds to conduct a search and it is limited to individualized suspicion and not group searches. Students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter school grounds.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This book includes several investigations of America’s most shocking crimes, in which Emily Craig takes you behind the scenes of real-life cases. Dr. Emily Craig, is a forensic anthropologist for the state of Kentucky Medical Examiner’s Office. She was the author of this spectacular book. Emily’s job was to examine bones, fragments of extremities, and burned human remains, to help determine how people died, who they were, and sometimes even what they looked like (which is what they often had to do). Emily is one of the best forensic anthropologists in the country, and has helped identify many murder victims and solve hundreds of cold cases. In the book Emily tells her stories about her spontaneous career, which has ranged from murder victims…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “A rose for Emily” is a short story about the last member of her family, and her very old father. The story was published in 1930, by a very well respected author, William Faulkner. When Emily’s father dies, she is completely heartbroken and denies that he is really dead.…

    • 62 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding citizens' protections against unreasonable searches and seizures a right guaranteed by the 4th Amendment. In 1914, the Court ruled that evidence obtained by police illegally is not admissible in federal court a practice known as the exclusionary rule. In 1980, a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, New Jersey, found T.L.O. and another girl smoking in a restroom a place that was by school rule a nonsmoking area. The two girls were taken to the principal's office where T.L.O.'s friend admitted that she had been smoking in the restroom. T.L.O. denied smoking there. She denied that she smoked at all. An assistant vice-principal demanded to see T.L.O.'s purse. Searching through it he found a pack of cigarettes. He also found rolling papers, a pipe, marijuana, a large wad of dollar bills, and two letters that indicated that T.L.O. was involved in marijuana dealing at the high school. T.L.O. was taken to the police station where she confessed that she had sold marijuana at the school. A juvenile court sentenced her to a year's probation. The State Supreme Court overturned the decision, stating that T.L.O.'s 4th Amendment rights had been violated. But White agreed with a lower court finding that a “school official may properly conduct a search of a student's person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline….” In other words, in a school, a search could be reasonable under the 4th Amendment without probable cause, so long as it was supported by reasonable suspicion or reasonable cause. The assistant vice-principal's search was considered reasonable under this definition. In 1985, the Supreme Court, by a 6-3 margin, ruled that New Jersey and the school had met a "reasonableness" standard for conducting such searches at school. The high court…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consumed by his intentions for Emily, Ellis's physical arousal remained under control as he subtly pushed her thoughts in the direction that he desired without being too obvious or raising her suspicions. So his cock remained softened in his trousers as he caressed the girl's skin and attempted to guide her ever closer to making a mental decision that would soon enough lead to her being on her knees and taking that very same cock, fully erect, in her oh-so-tight sixteen year-old cunt.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a town named Vernonia, Oregon, the local public schools faced a major problem regarding the drug use of students while participating in high school athletics (3). The Vernonia School Board were disturbed that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury (4), so they approved an anti-drug policy, the Student Athlete Drug Policy, which requires random drug testing of the school’s student athletes (5). However, this became a conflict with the parents of a child named James Acton. The parents refused to sign a consent form to allow their kid to take the drug test because they felt it went against the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable” searches (6). The case was dismissed in the Federal District Court and was appealed to the Court of Appeals for the 9th District (7). This court favored the Acton families’ complaint, but random drug testing in public schools was ruled allowable in 1988 in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin (8). The case went on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to conclude conflicting court decisions (9).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    jus 101

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Name the case in which the Supreme Court overruled a federal appellate court which had decided that an Oklahoma school district’s drug testing policy was unconstitutional. The SC ruled that a search of schoolchildren may be reasonable when supported by “special needs” which included a faculty monitor standing outside a bathroom listening for the “normal” sounds of urination.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - court agreed that searches by school officials do not violate the Fourth Amendment as long as the official has “ reasonable grounds to believe that a student possesses evidence of illegal activity or activity that would interfere with school discipline…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All though the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. consitition " the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (Ehlenberger 1)". School officials do not need probable cause or a warrant to search students, a public school is a place that should foster an environment that is safe and free from criminal activity. Drug dogs search ensures a protected student body and are only minimally invasive. Resource officers, teachers, and administartion with experience in this practice of drug searches often discover many complications with condoning the searches. First, officers need to have a reason to search for drugs.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal foundation for suspicionless student drug testing rests upon Vernonia v. Acton (1995). In that landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a school policy requiring student athletes to pass random urinalysis tests as a ground for participation in interscholastic sports. The Court rejected a Fourth Amendment claim asserting that such tests are an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. Closely watched nationwide, the decision effectively opened the door for school districts to institute similar policies of their own.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In school, student's Fourth Amendment rights are limited. Teachers and school administrators are legally allowed to search students without a warrant. Student's basic rights are being violated and it shouldn't be legal. Their rights shouldn't be limited because it invades student's privacy. Also, these searches could be unreasonable and suspicion less. These students can be searched without a warrant. People in school shouldn't have their rights limited and violated just because of suspicious teachers. This limitation of students' rights is unconstitutional.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug tests are a meaningful deterrent against drug use and a solid prevention strategy. The fourth amendment says "unreasonable search and seizure," It is NOT unreasonable to search a person if someone is giving them something. If a bank was giving out a loan, it would be quite reasonable for them search the applicant’s credit history. Applicants must to submit private and personal data to show they are eligible to receive government benefits. It is important that federal and state governments make sure that individuals who are receiving special assistance from the government are not using those funds that they are attaining to purchase and buy drugs instead of food and other necessity items.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welfare Drug Testing

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Among the main points of controversy for this issue is that the American Civil Liberties Union argues that it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment, saying the law constituted an “unreasonable search and seizure” by the government. (Sulzberger) Advocates for the poor say the testing policies single out and vilify victims of the recession, disputing the idea that people on welfare are more likely to use drugs. I expect the average working; tax paying citizen would disagree with the notion that drug testing is a violation of any rights. Especially since most of these individuals had to undergo a drug test to get the job that that in turn helps to pay for federal assistance programs.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Random drug testing in high schools is constitutional, and all students who participate in competitive extracurricular activities can be forced to comply with random drug testing. Schools are also allowed to conduct drug tests on students if suspicion arises that they have been using drugs. There are many reasons why conducting random drug tests on students is important. Drug tests are not only useful for creating a strong and secure place for learning, but they also provide an escape for students who have been put under…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays