Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Drug Search

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
845 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Drug Search
All though the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. consitition " the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (Ehlenberger 1)". School officials do not need probable cause or a warrant to search students, a public school is a place that should foster an environment that is safe and free from criminal activity. Drug dogs search ensures a protected student body and are only minimally invasive.

Resource officers, teachers, and administartion with experience in this practice of drug searches often discover many complications with condoning the searches. First, officers need to have a reason to search for drugs. School officals need only reasonable suspicion to search
…show more content…
One reason I support letting drug dog in our school is because it's safer for the environment and for the students. Experts say the use of dogs reflect the problem administration face as they try to protect the schools, while providing a comfortable environment for students ( Robinson). This evidence proves that allowing these kids of searches will make the school environment safer. Secondly, drug dogs are important because it attacks the problem before it gets out of control. They deter those who would think of bringing drugs or firearm on a campus...they dont know, when the searches are coming...they just don't know think it's worth it to bring drugs, alchol, or firearms into schools ( Robinson 3). This shows that having drug dogs will lessen the chances of kids bringing any non-appropraite items to school. Lastly using drug dogs for searches sends a clear message to students and the community that schools are drug/gunfree zone. "I may not be able to control what students do off school property, but I do not want parents or students to fear that they will be in class with other students who are under the influence (Robinson)". This evidence suggests that schools and the administration want the public to know that schools are a drug free zone and they will try and keep it that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill” involves students and their Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that citizens are free from unreasonable search and seizure from the government. However, school administration (an extension of government) does have the power to implement searches and seizures that may be outside of the constitutional scope in order to maintain good order and discipline in the school. This is evidenced by the Supreme Court case New Jersey vs. T.L.O where the Supreme Court ruled that requiring schools to obtain warrants for searches would interfere with the swift and informal disciplinary procedures needed in schools. However, the Supreme Court also stated that there must be reasonable grounds to conduct a search and it is limited to individualized suspicion and not group searches. Students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter school grounds.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”. But, does this Amendment apply to students in the public school systems?…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding citizens' protections against unreasonable searches and seizures a right guaranteed by the 4th Amendment. In 1914, the Court ruled that evidence obtained by police illegally is not admissible in federal court a practice known as the exclusionary rule. In 1980, a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, New Jersey, found T.L.O. and another girl smoking in a restroom a place that was by school rule a nonsmoking area. The two girls were taken to the principal's office where T.L.O.'s friend admitted that she had been smoking in the restroom. T.L.O. denied smoking there. She denied that she smoked at all. An assistant vice-principal demanded to see T.L.O.'s purse. Searching through it he found a pack of cigarettes. He also found rolling papers, a pipe, marijuana, a large wad of dollar bills, and two letters that indicated that T.L.O. was involved in marijuana dealing at the high school. T.L.O. was taken to the police station where she confessed that she had sold marijuana at the school. A juvenile court sentenced her to a year's probation. The State Supreme Court overturned the decision, stating that T.L.O.'s 4th Amendment rights had been violated. But White agreed with a lower court finding that a “school official may properly conduct a search of a student's person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline….” In other words, in a school, a search could be reasonable under the 4th Amendment without probable cause, so long as it was supported by reasonable suspicion or reasonable cause. The assistant vice-principal's search was considered reasonable under this definition. In 1985, the Supreme Court, by a 6-3 margin, ruled that New Jersey and the school had met a "reasonableness" standard for conducting such searches at school. The high court…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order for an officer to search a person they must have some sort of reason for doing so. This reason is also known as probable cause. The officer must have some sort of feeling that the individual that they want to search may be carrying something that could cause harm to that person or to the officer doing the search.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a town named Vernonia, Oregon, the local public schools faced a major problem regarding the drug use of students while participating in high school athletics (3). The Vernonia School Board were disturbed that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury (4), so they approved an anti-drug policy, the Student Athlete Drug Policy, which requires random drug testing of the school’s student athletes (5). However, this became a conflict with the parents of a child named James Acton. The parents refused to sign a consent form to allow their kid to take the drug test because they felt it went against the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against “unreasonable” searches (6). The case was dismissed in the Federal District Court and was appealed to the Court of Appeals for the 9th District (7). This court favored the Acton families’ complaint, but random drug testing in public schools was ruled allowable in 1988 in Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin (8). The case went on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to conclude conflicting court decisions (9).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - a school official may properly conduct a search of student’s person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline or enforce school policies.”…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There have been 74 school shootings in the United States since the Sandy Hook shooting. This number is extremely high and causes heartbreak to our country; students deserve to attend school with no fear. Security guards and rules are not enough. Targeted bookbag and locker searches should be allowed because it would lower the amount of deaths and injuries in schools, lowers the amount of drug use in schools, brings a positive look to schools, and communities. Believing that these searches or maybe even metal detectors will help with the danger in schools today. According to Kate R. Ehlenberger, “Officials conduct random or blanket searches not because of individualized suspicion, but as a preventive measure. Examples of random searches include the use of metal detectors in school entrances and…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is assess the limits search and seizure in public schools, apply specific ruling, analyze the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case and explain, recommend changes to existing (specific) laws to create a fairer educational setting in terms of search and seizure and peer review. School officials are responsible for providing a safe and orderly school environment. The officials are required to address disrupting or unsafe behavior that violate school policy and rules. It may require searching of students and their belongings. Dealing with disrupted behavior is a difficult situation that requires decision-making on when, where and how to conduct a search and seizure. My assess limit search and seizure is on hunch or just general search. School officials must have reasonable or proper cause to search.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to redalertpolitics.com, there is an average of 7 incidents in the United States from weapons that result in an automatic expulsion. Students also bring drugs to sell or to have for themselves to keep in their locker during the school day. Drug dogs are commonly used by police to search for drugs in schools, but what if the dog has a cold and can’t sniff anything out that day? These are real life issues that some people face and are quite alarming. There may be one solution, though, for sick drugs dogs; you can always check the video camera for any suspicion before you claim someone tolerated a school…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To them, it protects students rather then invading their privacy. Going through student's things doesn't ensure safety, it makes them not trust school authority. Others believe that students can't be trusted with bags in school. Again, this causes students to not trust advisors at school. If administrators want students to trust them, they shouldn't search their things without their permission. Limitations on student's Fourth Amendment rights are inexcusable.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies show that not only drug testing teachers for the students' safety, this act could save lives. Twenty-four year old Gina Riso, a beginning biology teacher at Bangor Area High School, died or heroin overdose. Local police searched her apartment,finding five bags of heroin, a marijuana grinder, a Tic Tac box filled with unknown pills, and pill bottles filler with marijuana seeds and others filled with a white powder. Gina could be alive today; she might have been teaching right this moment. For most people, drug testing has been a fact of life. No business wants his or her souped-up manager working the front counter of their shop.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays