Preview

Elisabeth and Descartes' Conversation in Descartes' Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Elisabeth and Descartes' Conversation in Descartes' Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy
Philosophy 1301
Professor Danny Brown
June 15, 2013
Elizabeth and Descartes’s Conversation In his book “Discourse on Method and Mediations on First Philosophy”, Descartes mentioned the composition of the body and mind. When Princess Elizabeth read his book, she had many questions to give to Descartes, especially about the mind-body interaction. She said in her letter wrote to Descartes “how the soul can determine the spirits of the body to produce voluntary actions.” (Elizabeth, 11) They wrote letter to each other to ask questions and to answer each other’s questions. As we read along the letter, we can see the questions and answers of both Elizabeth and Descartes are irresistible.
Descartes pointed his theoretical points that “This ‘I’ – that is, the soul, by which I am what I am, is entirely distinct from the body; and would not fail to be what it is even if the body did not exist.” (Descartes) In his explanation, Descartes believed that mind and body are all together. When the mind thinks, it makes the soul reacts as its thought. That is why the theory enters society “I think; therefore, I am.” (Descartes) After reading that theory, Elizabeth responded that “I beseech you tell me how the soul of man (since it is but a thinking substance) can determine the spirits of the body to produce voluntary actions.” (Elizabeth, 11) She was questioning about how the mind-body can work together and act voluntarily, according to Descartes’s theoretical point. She also explained how she comes up with this question “You entirely exclude extension from your notion of the soul, and contact seems to me incompatible with an immaterial thing. That is why I ask of you a definition of the soul more particular than in your metaphysics – that is to say, for a definition of the substance separate from its action, thought.” (Elizabeth, 12) Then, on May 21, 1643, Descartes wrote back to her to answer her question that he found three “primitive notions” which can answer her



Cited: Atherton, Katherine. “Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia”. Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period. Hackett Publishing, 1994: 9-21. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    PSYCH 102 Chapter Outline

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages

    René Descartes (1596–1650) was a dualist and proposed that mind and body interact at the pineal gland. He hypothesized that the cerebrospinal fluid of the brain’s cavities contained spirits which flowed from the brain through the nerves to the muscles, provoking movement.…

    • 10896 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes was a brilliant thinker, philosopher, scientist, physiologist, and early psychologist whose theory of mind-body connection has become an integral part of modern medicine (Goodwin, 2008). His dualist view, asserted the mind was ethereal and autonomous in relation to the physical and strictly material body, and to account for their interaction, he proposed the pineal gland was where the intersection of the two transpired (Goodwin, 2008). He theorized the mechanistic, reflexive nature of certain human behaviors, although his one caveat was that reasoning and thoughts were unique properties of the human soul (Wickens, 2005). Descartes 's work laid some of the fundamental parameters for modern thought in psychology, encouraged further research on the localization of brain function, and promoted further experimental research of the nervous system (Goodwin, 2008).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes concludes that we are distinct from our body, and can exist without it. Seen from a modern materialist’s perspective, Descartes’ view is quite obviously wrong. However, assuming no knowledge of modern science, we should still be able to disprove his conclusion by looking for flaws in his reasoning in the text. In this essay, I will examine three relevant arguments Descartes presents in his sixth meditation and point out their flaws respectively.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Methods and Meditations on First Philosophy is a discourse by Rene Descartes, which largely focuses on the nature of humanity and divinity. This essay is a discussion of this discourse, and will summarize, explain and object to various parts of his work. The majority of this essay focuses on Descartes Sixth Meditation, which includes his argument that corporeal things do exist.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among Descartes’ many notable arguments, in the Sixth Meditation he makes a case for the real distinction between mind and body. This idea that mind and body are distinct was not common during Descartes’ time and conflicted directly with the popularly accepted scholastic view of the human being as a hylomorphic substance. The argument of the Sixth Meditation draws on much of Descartes’ own work concerning substance, attributes and distinction. In this paper, I will argue that he arrives at the conclusion that mind and body are in fact distinct by a categorical syllogism, focusing primarily on defending the minor premise that mind and body can be conceived as separate.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Separation of Mind and Body and the Modern Biological Perspective.17th-century philosopher René Descartes proposed a new idea: a difference between the spiritual mind and the physical body.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Divisibility

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes believes that the mind and body is different things and that the body is dividable but the mind is not dividable. I’m not sure what I believe, but I think I believe at least for now that the mind and body is two different things. I will explore why Descartes thinks you can divide a body and why he thinks a mind is not dividable. As well as what Descartes response should be to Armstrong’s criticism. Was Descartes right or not? I think this is all up to the interpretation of Descartes Divisibility. There is a number of ways this may be interpreted.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes is, perhaps, the philosopher that most people reference when discussing the mind-body problem. For Descartes, there are two substances: Mind and Matter. Each substance has a defining attribute. In the case of Mind, the defining attribute is Thought. In the case of Matter, the defining attribute is spatial Extension. It is important to note that for Descartes, substances can have nothing in common, otherwise they would not be fundamentally different things. The mind-body problem arises out of this view of substances, because if mind and body have nothing in common, then in what way can they be said to interact? This is known as the problem of interaction.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, one of the solutions for the Mind-Body Problem is Dualism, in which Descartes uses the argument of the “Indubitable Existence”. Written in the Second Meditation, Descartes suggests, “You can’t doubt that you have a mind, as you will find yourself entertaining a thought, and therefore you must grant that you have a mind …that it is possible to doubt that you have a body… therefore one can conclude that your mind must have a property your body lacks”. (Sober, 2013; pp.206)…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assess Dualism

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Descartes’s first principle of philosophy, “I think, therefore I am”, makes mind more certain than matter. It also showed that the mind which is a thinking thing can exist apart from its extended body. Hence, Descartes said that the mind is a substance that is different from the body (a substance whose essence is thought). This became known as “Substance Dualism” (view that the mind and body function separately, without interchange) or “Cartesian Dualism” (view that there is a two-way interaction between mental and physical substances).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes S Myth

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page

    In “Descartes’s Myth,” Gilbert Ryle main conclusion is that the body and mind are two separate beings.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Schultz, S. E., & Schultz, D. P. (2011). A history of modern psychology (10th ed.).…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conversely to Hobbes somewhat monism doctrine, Descartes attempts to scrutinise this insufficient and put the reader in a position of contemplation over this. Formerly, Descartes attempts to disambiguate Hobbes absurdity from his reading of his proposition, by contending imperatively that he is not attempting to draw an identical affinity between a subject engaging in thought and the faculty of thinking, rather the usage of the ‘mind, soul, understanding and reason’ (Ibid,2000); is an employment of the elements encompassing thinking. Furthermore, he confutes that substance involved in the act of thinking should be considered from the perspective of the body; deploring Hobbes heavy usage of concrete terminology ‘subject, matter and body’ (Ibid, 2000). This is perhaps the most part of Descartes reply where he is most vitriolic about Hobbes objection undermining it to be idiosyncratic, relying on a supposition. He contends that the nature of the act of thinking is of a different entirety to act denoting material…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I think, therefore I am"

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes felt that that the power of thinking or sensing has nothing to do with the physical body. If he could cease all thinking than he could cease to exist. A thing that thinks is "a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses"(Descartes 20). There is a clear separation between the mind and the body. If the body exists, it does not mean the "I" exist. The mind is something that is thinking, indivisible, and non-extended while the body is something that is non-thinking, divisible and extended. He believes in the standard of perfection, which must be separate from his mind because of the imperfection in his thinking.…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays