East 21st Bridge Analysis

Over the extent of this course, we have learned many strategies and tools to help improve our writing. These have been condensed into 4 outcomes which our goal of this year is to be able to portray through a showcase of our works. My selections clearly outline these principles and display them thoughtfully.
Firstly, the ability “To demonstrate an awareness of the strategies that writers use in different writing contexts.” is important for all readers and writers alike, as it allows us to discern what is trying to be accomplished in the paper. The Right to Go Home, displays this in its fitting analysis of the action movie genre. As does East 21st Bridge, in its description of a bridge that crosses the Thea Foss Waterway. These texts are tailored to both an academic and nonacademic audience. The Right to Go Home tailored to movie critics and literary devotees, whereas the East 21st Street Bridge could be sent to the City’s board or architectural students.
Secondly, “To read, analyze, and synthesize complex texts and incorporate multiple kinds of evidence purposefully in order to generate and
Typically before submitting anything my papers will be run through two edits, one for the structure of ideas and argument, and the next for sentence-level grammar and redundancy. However, for this showcase, my East 21st Street Bridge went through substantial revision. Through the use of the comments and questions raised, I developed my major themes of nature vs modern man, and the unity of classes (blue and white collar) that the bridge brings, making the paper a bit more important. In a Right to Go Home, I implemented the intended audience and who it appeals to. Moreover, in The Fight for Land the redundant sentence structure was removed, and a short hook into the idea of giving over taking was produced in the