Preview

Does The FCC Restoring Internet Freedom Order (2018) Impact. Internet Access?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does The FCC Restoring Internet Freedom Order (2018) Impact. Internet Access?
Outline Template

PROMPT: To what extent does the FCC Restoring Internet Freedom Order (2018) impact internet access?

Introduction
The internet is one of the most powerful instruments today when it comes to obtaining information, entertainment, and wealth. Net neutrality, which was issued by the FCC under the Obama administration in 2015, is the principle behind the openness and freedom of browsing the internet, regardless of the content, source, or use. These rules have prohibited internet service providers from blocking, slowing down, charging for, or favoring certain applications online. However, now these all these limitations have been abolished by the Restoring Internet Freedom Order (2018) under the plan of FCC chairman Ajit Pai, the internet is no longer equally accessible to all Americans. From censoring content to slowing down your favorite
…show more content…
Evidence: People of color, the LGBTQ communtiy, and people of religious and cultural minorities minorities in America use the internet to organize, plan, and access different economic and educational opportunities to fight back against prejudice. (savetheinternet.com)
Evidence: Carmen Scurato, director of policy and legal affairs for the L.A. based nonprofit the National Hispanic Media Coalition claims that the "internet is what we use to tell our own stories. [This change is] going to silence our voices." (Romero, laweekly.com)
Analysis: These groups will be misrepresented and won’t be able to fight back against discrimination. When activist groups are able to bring thousands of people together for protests on the streets at such short notice, it’s because the ISPs cannot block their announcements or sites.

Counter argument: Some may argue that the repeal of net neutrality will promote competition, innovation and media diversity in order to advance the public

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Such a categorical approach "import[s] law developed in very different contexts into a new and changing environment, and . . . lack[s] the flexibility necessary to allow government…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But, what the FCC isn’t taking into account is the millions of internet users that want to keep internet neutrality. With net neutrality maintained, users of the internet will have equal access to the internet, which will increase their total…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet has created a forum in which people excluded from traditional methods of gathering information are granted access. While…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Internet provides a growing platform for inaccurate, untrue and questionable information. On the upside, the miracle of Internet connectivity speeds peoples access to the information, knowledge and insights that contribute to humanities social and intellectual evolution. It also helps sweep aside information gatekeepers in positions of power whose “arrogant . . . unimaginative and shortsighted” approach to information has traditionally promoted their own interests and attitudes toward control (Lovett 16). Lovett states that “the right to free speech begins and ends with the First Amendment, but there is a vast middle where our freedom of speech is protected by our capacity to listen and accept that people disagree” (18). The First Amendment’s protections have always put a great deal of responsibility in the hands of the people and now they have more of that power…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When asked asked what the benefits and drawbacks of new technologies were Gardner responded, “...the Internet has certainly contributed to the broadening of acceptable identities in today’s young people,” Gardner continues stating examples, such as being a geek or openly gay, that are now considered to be socially acceptable. Gardner explains that with the use of new technologies teens are encountering more diversity; cultural, religious, and general diversity “reinforce the acceptance of difference.” What Gardner did not include was that while it opened up acceptance horizons, it also opened shunning horizons, more so bullying horizons, because with the acceptance individuals became more open about themselves, and so did the people who did not agree with them. Everyday someone is shunned for being who they are, with advancements in social networking somebody in the United Kingdom could tell another in the United States that they are an abomination, what they’re doing or how they’re living their life is wrong, being themself is wrong. So, has technology really opened acceptance, or has it given a false hope, a facade, of acceptance to cover up the new form of intolerance; the only difference now is you’re being judged by somebody who doesn’t know you, a face you’ll never see, a voice you’ll never hear, a text box you’ll never forget.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The recipe for a strong argument is comprised of two main facets. One is its ability to persuade and the other its ability to reason. It’s possible for an argument to persuade without reason, but if an article lacks reason and fails to persuade it’s left completely exposed. Alice Bailey and Laura Tallman’s article, “Internet filters are gates, not erasers, to protect kids in library” which appeared in 2009 in The Press Democrat, exemplifies an argument that attempts to persuade while lacking credibility, reason and accountability. The focus of Bailey and Tallman’s article is to persuade the reader to support the idea of internet filters in public libraries in attempt to protect children from pornographic images, to which they claim carry incomparable danger. The article uses fear as a means to persuade and to make up for its substantial lack of evidence and organization. It is is scattered with loaded language and proof surrogates while all together presenting a false dilemma to the reader, which is intolerable in a topic that surrounds the First Amendment. For these reasons the “Gates” article is unacceptable and fails as an argumentative piece of writing.…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Besides this governmental change, there are also parts of the Patriot Act that are in contrast with the laws that are set in the US Constitution: The fourth amendment of the Constitution clarifies “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated… or things to be seized”, while the Patriot Act reverses this right by enabling the government to “search and seize American’s papers and effects without probable cause to assist terror…

    • 2726 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media Bias In America

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The internet has changed the way news is conveyed because it is now easier to personally search key terms regarding political information instead of relying on specific news sources. Although politics has become easier to research, politics is a smaller subject compared to other topics in the internet. For instance, Americans are more particularly interested in popular culture rather than politics; before election day, only 12% of hits regarded political information. The positives of relying on the internet for our news include strengthening a citizen’s opinion after backing up their views with political information, in addition, campaigning websites has allowed for better communication and the ability to reply and critique an internet platform. In contrast, the drawbacks of internet reliance for news comprise of one-sided news articles that are potentially biased along with false blogs and news articles that may delude…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, equality has been achieved for most, and very few pockets of prejudice still exist. However, these pockets are not like those that existed in the early 1900s. Frequently, racism is displayed from African American individuals towards the “privileged” caucasian population. Similar movements pertaining to the rights of the LGBT community have began to protest the right to free speech. Modern activism has seen a major shift from what it once stood for. In the past, activists stood to increase the rights belonging to their own group. Now, protests seek to remove the rights of others in order to defend the opinions of the protestor.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As one of the most significant inventions of the human being, the Internet enormously changed people's lives. We can enjoy quantities of free and abundant resources from the Internet. Like most of netizen, I am used to watch videos in Youtube and gain knowledge by google and wikipedia. It is hard to imagine how inconvenient our life will be without the convenient Internet. Unfortunately, this situation would be changed by two bills -SOPA and PIPA.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stop Anti Piracy Act

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the past 10 years, the internet has impacted our culture in various ways. It is the epitome of convenience, something we Americans appreciate. The internet has replaced the need to go to a local library, where there would be a limited number of books and other sources of information; the internet provides us with countless sources that are being updated every day, which includes video, audio, and typed documents. Today, you can find and use the internet anywhere you go by using a cell phone or many other mobile electronic devices. We rely on it daily to check the news, the weather, to search for movie times at a theatre, and even to keep in touch with friends. It even helps businesses and companies by advertising, selling goods, and creating jobs. All of those things and more can be found with very little effort and very little time. Now, imagine that all of your favorite websites or search engines were blocked and could never be up and running again. In October, the U.S. Senate and House of Representative proposed a bill called Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). Luke Johnson of the Huffington Post defines the Stop Online Piracy Act with, “the legislation would allow copyright holders and the Justice Department to seek court orders against websites associated with copyright infringement.” The copyright infringements, even if unintentional, could be the end to many websites. Declan McCullagh of cnet.com had found, “Laurence Tribe,… has argued that SOPA is unconstitutional because, if enacted, "an entire Web site containing tens of thousands of pages could be targeted if only a single page were accused of infringement."’ This has caused a lot of attention from high school students to major companies such as Google. The bill is worded in a way so that there are many ways a website could be shut down, even by something as menial as a few words. Luke Johnson also stated, “The language in the bill is vague, however, and could spark the shutdown of many…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays