Preview

Does human nature make war inevitable?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does human nature make war inevitable?
Does human nature make war inevitable?
“There is no such thing as inevitable war. If war comes it will be from failure of human wisdom. Is war embedded in our nature? To be able to answer such complex question one must consider the arguments that may perhaps offer rational value to explain why this assertion is in fact true. “As far as we know war has been a part of human history and civilisation since prehistoric times, so for one to simply assume that a world without war is inevitable is indeed incorrect. This assumption of War is deeply rooted in people’s way of life that when disagreements concerning states or groups in a country end up in a violent conflict they assume that it is almost normal. This assumption rooted in to society’s opinion is considered quite narrow; therefore essential changes are necessary for people to avoid eventual violent and blood shedding wars. To clarify the above statement this essay will focus on war and its definition, causes of war and human nature and war. There are many definitions of war, and regularly the offered definitions conceal a specific political or philosophical position of the author. The Oxford dictionary defines war as “a state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country (2013)”. Thus, directing one to believe that war is basically the result of when two or more groups are incapable of reasonable and meaningful communication and also when an individual or a group’s character is mutually hostile or belligerent, consequently promoting war for repressive intentions. If considered in detail war is maybe the greatest irrational concept of humanity. A number of people may claim that war is normal, for the reason that human beings are animals, and as we know animals fight and kill each other frequently. Another well-known definition is Carl von Clausewitz the so called philosopher of war implies that war is “the continuation of policy by other means”, this notion is mutually

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Storm of Steel Paper

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to answer this question it is first important to determine the fraises “pro-war” and “anti-war”. The term “pro-war” describes an attitude in which war is desired, necessary or justifiable. The term “anti-war” describes the opposite; war is viewed as immoral and is generally opposed and condemned. This paper will argue that there are grounds in the book to support both proposition.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Warfare Reformatted

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    IS WAR A BIOLOGICAL necessity, a sociological inevitability, or just a bad invention? Those who argue for the first view endow man with such pugnacious instincts that some outlet in aggressive behaviour is necessary if man is to reach full human stature. It was this point of view which lay behind William James's famous essay, 'The Moral Equivalent of War', in which he tried to retain the warlike virtues and channel them in new directions. A similar point of view has lain behind the Soviet Union's attempt to make competition between groups rather than between individuals. A basic, competitive, aggressive, warring human nature is assumed, and those who wish to outlaw war or outlaw competitiveness merely try to find new and less socially destructive ways in which these biologically given aspects of man's nature can find expression. Then there are those who take the second view: warfare is the inevitable concomitant of the development of the state, the struggle for land and natural resources, of class societies springing not from the nature of man, but, from the nature of history. War is nevertheless inevitable unless we change our social system and outlaw classes, the struggle for power, and possessions; and in the event of our success warfare would disappear, as a symptom vanishes when the disease is cured.…

    • 2915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Mead Warfare

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Warfare: An Invention- Not a Biological Necessity, Margaret Mead states that war is a creation of man, not a necessity we need in order to thrive. She begins by stating that those who believe war is a biological necessity see men as aggressive by nature. This natural aggression leads men to need an outlet for their frustration which, in this case, is war. She proceeds to suggest that war is a creation of society. The origins of war, such as the struggle for land and natural resources, are not man’s nature, they are the nature of the society and history. Lastly, Mead points out that war is inevitable until we change our social system and our desire for power and possessions. If this change of system is successful, “warfare would disappear,…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War is ubiquitous; there will always be one country at war with another during all the times of the year. The first recorded war was in 2700 BCE in Mesopotamia between Sumer and Elam, and the latest have been the Syrian and Iraq wars. Although there have been countless amounts of changes in warfare since 2700 BCE there will forever be a constant controversy about what good comes from war. While soldiers are risking their lives across the world civilians are at home contemplating the pros and cons of warfare. Though trauma that accompanies war is unforgivable, war is not entirely useless. Without it countries and people around the world would be taken advantage of. The destruction left behind by war is nothing in comparison to the catastrophic…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After World war one, people were divided on the idea of the necessity of war. The destruction of cities and towns made people not want to have to fight for some ideas they didn’t even believe in. But even after all this some militarists in Europe still believed that war was a necessity of human nature. While looking at a source for a European militarists, Friedrich Von Bernhardi, and a U.S. Pacifist, William James, I will compare these two sources to how both authors define war, if they believe it's possible to eliminate war, and what they believe is the solution to fixing war is. I will also give my opinion on what I believe war’s purpose is.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Module 2 Essay

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page

    War is the outcome of tension between two or more nations. In fact, wars do not happen instantaneously, but rather the outcome of long periods of tension and conflicts.…

    • 278 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will be giving the definition of war and conflict and I will be describing the causes of war and giving examples of wars that have happened because of the conflicts that I will be mentioning in my essay. The causes of war I will be looking at will be; Politics, Nationalism, Ideology, Land, resources, historical rivalry, ethnic conflict and religion. These are the main causes of war.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today's society, the possession and effective use of force is necessary. We have to recognize that we live in an imperfect world where evil seems to be an inevitablity. Our constant need for power makes the idea of a violent free world unimaginable. As long as we continue on this power hungry path the political issues will continue on this same path. Force is necessary with our current societal conditions and can be looked at as irresponsible when a nation does not prepare for the necessity of force. Any political conversation that entails the words, truth, liberty or peace run hand in hand with the use of force to create them. The perspective of some people are…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Filter Research

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conflicts between fellow man remain constantly noticed and remembered, preventing humanity from truly achieving peace and unity as a species. An article featured on The Guardian written by Steve Taylor states an early American psychologist’s (William James)’ theory on war is that war’s prevalence is due to the positive psychological effects it brings. James states, “War establishes a sense of unity against the face of a commonly shared threat, binding people together.” The article continues to mention how war supplies a sense of a cohesive community, communal goals, and the inspiration of everyone in the country to act without selfishness and with honor. This supplies the feeling of purpose and meaning, and suppresses the feeling of monotony in everyday life. The most plausible way we can get through this Great Filter is by using technology to enhance our lives rather than using it for self-destructive purposes, and finding different outlets that suppresses the feeling of a monotone lifestyle. James suggests that humans need to find alternative activities to express the positive effects of involving ourselves in a war, that do not include the destruction and rifts created between nations after wars are complete. This leads to the clear idea that “stable, lasting peace” depends on the development and growth of societies with a rich amount of variety and opportunity that can satisfy the most complex human necessities and wants. The article featured on The Guardian details that due to the abundance of societies “unable to [satisfy the basic necessities of mankind]” makes our future expectations of peace look very bleak. With our main focus shifting from war to peace and collaboration between all nations, as well as advancing our technology, our collective knowledge can…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    And people should be peaceful and friendly so war doesn’t have to happen. War can bring an end to everyone’s lives if people don’t stop fighting in war. The short story “The Sniper” and the poem “The Man He Killed” show and explain how war can be painful. Also, how war can tear people apart and cause suffering. They show how war is not a fun thing to experience, and if the world wants less people to die then some people suggest that war is not the answer. So, people don’t stop fighting in war, or war will kill us…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wwii

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War is an ugly event that man has created over time. Darwin once said, “History is a battle of nations and races against one another for their domination. It is genetics and the belief in a master nation and master race.” War does two things; it helps or it hurts. It honors or it hijacks. Usually however war binds people together if the fight is for right of justice.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ehrenreich’s logical reasoning is based on war throughout recorded history. She states that one can “find a predilection for warfare among hunter-gatherers, hunting and farming peoples, industrial and even post industrial societies, democracies, and dictatorships.” This appeal to logic forms the assertion that war does not plague a single type or feature of society nor does it discriminate against certain peoples. When offering stats in support of her argument about the cost of war in the current time, Ehrenreich is viewed as knowledgeable and informed in her argument. By presenting a strong, clear claim and providing evidential support, Ehrenreich’s main claim appears more convincing to her audience.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Love vs. Hate

    • 2927 Words
    • 12 Pages

    When love is present it is what matters the most, no obstacle is too big to overcome, and hate does not exist…

    • 2927 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays