Preview

Distributive Justice

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4465 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Distributive Justice
Distributive Justice (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Page 1 of 26

Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free

Distributive Justice
First published Sun Sep 22, 1996; substantive revision Mon Mar 5, 2007 Principles of distributive justice are normative principles designed to guide the allocation of the benefits and burdens of economic activity. After outlining the scope of this entry and the role of distributive principles, the first relatively simple principle of distributive justice examined is strict egalitarianism, which advocates the allocation of equal material goods to all members of society. John Rawls' alternative distributive principle,
…show more content…
They can vary in what is subject to distribution (income, wealth, opportunities, jobs, welfare, utility, etc.); in the nature of the subjects of the distribution (natural persons, groups of persons, reference classes, etc.); and on what basis distribution should be made (equality, maximization, according to individual characteristics, according to free transactions, etc.). This entry will focus on principles of distributive justice designed to cover the distribution of the benefits and burdens of economic activity among individuals in a society. Although principles of this kind have been the dominant source of Anglo-American debate about distributive justice over the last four decades, there are other important distributive justice questions, some of which are covered by other entries in the encyclopedia. These include questions of distributive justice at the global level rather than just at the national level (see justice: international), distributive justice across generations (see justice: intergenerational) and how the topic of distributive justice can be approached, not as a set of principles but as a virtue (see justice: as a virtue). Although the numerous proposed distributive principles vary along different dimensions, for simplicity, they are broadly grouped here. It is important to keep in mind though that this involves oversimplication, particularly with respect to the criticisms of each of the groups of principles. The criticisms may not apply to every principle in the group. The issue of how we are to understand and respond to criticisms of distributive principles is discussed briefly in the section on methodology at the end (see

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    justice

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Eddie Mabo is one of the most famous and significant Australian Aboriginals. He is famous for campaigning for Indigenous land rights. He was born on the 29th of June, 1946, on Murray Island, in the Torres Strait. Eddie Mabo married Bonita Newhow and together they had ten children. In 1982 Eddie Mabo and four other Torres Strait Islanders initiated action against the Australian Authorities calming ownership of their land on Murray Island. Eddie Mabo was exiled from Murray Island when he was sixteen. During this time he lived and worked across Northern Queensland.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Justice refers to the theory that everyone is entitled to a fair and equal share of resources regardless of who they are or how much they have contributed. (ANA, n.d.)…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A just society should be one that leads to progression and protects an individual's rights and freedoms. In this paper I will take Rawls position that we would create a more just society by creating a minimum standard of living for everyone. One of the main points presented in Nozick’s theory is that redistribution is wrong because it is unjust to steal resources that were justly earned from one person and to give it to someone else. In principle Nozick is correct that redistribution is unjust in the sense that we are taking resources from one person to give to another, however, Nozick’s view doesn’t account for the fact that people aren’t born with equal opportunity so without redistribution it results in a hierarchy that keeps increasing.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Distributive justice is defined as how goods or wealth are portioned based on a common and accepted standard. But what is an ideal standard? For Feinberg, there are six principles to which distributive justice may be based on: Perfect Equality, Need, Merit by Skill, Merit by Virtue, Achievement, and Effort.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Services Ethics

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The benefits of risks of research must be distributed fairly. There should be fair processes and results to select the research subjects for both individuals and society.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people may argue that a society with distinct economic inequality is fair-minded than a society with a generally equal wealth distribution. Fair markets tend to develop distinct economic inequalities as I discussed. Economic equality then generally needs the use of redistributive state policies such as progressive taxes. In basic terms, economic equality requires taking from the “have’s” and giving to the “have not’s.”…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this chapter the topic I found most interesting was Distributive justice, or social justice. Distributive justice is the distribution of society’s benefits and burdens fairly, including things such as jobs, income, property, taxes, etc. The reason I found this topic interesting is because, I borderline agree to it and disagree to it. I am all for helping people in need, like the poor and homeless, but in the event that its going to affect others not so much.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice is a concept that can be broken down into a series of smaller beliefs or ideas. In many societies, justice is a system in which the people of a community or group are treated according to their actions and behavior. In societies such as this, people typically have roles that are delegated or earn where the people who disobey or do not follow the laws or regulations are punish. The idea of what kind of justice a person is entitled to is called distributive justice. This type of justice attempts to determine how and why a person should receive certain benefits or things.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soc 331

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, let us look at what the definition are for retributive, commutative, and distributive justice. Retributive justice “is the proper response to people who have acted unjustly, commutative justice is a fair exchange-through contract, covenant, or other agreement- that fulfills the rights and responsibilities of all parties involved, and the distributive justice is justice in the distribution of goods and services” (Driesbach, 2013).…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, was born 384 years before Christ (BC). He separated justice into two parts – distributive justice and corrective justice. Distributive justice is concerned with the fair distribution of society’s wealth. He went onto say that this wealth should be spread according to merit and an individual’s contributions into society. So this system relies on giving to those who have contributed in some way rather than to those who are needy. Aristotle said that distribution on the basis of people needs merely rewards the lazy and so would be unjust. Corrective justice he said, is needed to ensure that individuals can keep their entitlements. He believed that if someone is to steal from another the court should ensure that the offender does not gain and the victim does not lose out. This idea can still be seen in areas of law such as compensatory damages for negligence.…

    • 3979 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle on Justice

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The criticism I am concerned with here challenges the notion that specific justice is a moral virtue. I shall argue that the solution to this challenge is to carefully distinguish between the results arising from mis-distributions of these social goods, the concern of specific distributable justice, and the resulting harm to others. I shall argue that there is an objectively specific unjust feature to these mis-distributions that requires rectificatory justice. In response to the first criticism, I shall argue that this criticism, in effect, fails to do justice to Aristotle's distinction between general and specific justice. In cases where an agent commits an act of general injustice, rectificatory justice is needed to address the resulting imbalance in the distribution pattern of social goods…

    • 2000 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Nozick breaks down his theory of distributive justice into three guidelines of justice which define how something not formerly owned by someone may be acquired, how possession of an item can be transferred from one individual to another and what should be done to resolve situations in which one of the first two rules in violated. For people to better understand his theory, Nozick uses a neutral term to define the possession of things, calling them “people’s holdings”. The principle of his theory suggests that the circulation of something is ‘just’ if every party is entitled to the holdings they own under the circulation. The two parts of this theory are broken down as “justice in acquisition”, how to acquire a holding justly from nature, and “justice in transfer”, how to transfer holdings justly. Justice in acquisition focuses on how people first come to own something, and which items can be rightfully owned. It suggests that an individually is just in holding if they have produced the item which they possess and if it is something that can be owned. For example, if you own a pin maker and have worked long hours producing pins, you rightfully have possession over those pins, and you can do with them what you want. Justice in transfer suggests that if one individual…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays