Preview

Discuss The Juxtaposition Between Dogmas And Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss The Juxtaposition Between Dogmas And Human Nature
Through the juxtaposition between dogmas and human nature, Marx also highlights how humans cannot credit human nature to dogmas and abstract ideas, like religion. Religion does not provide a stable human nature. Throughout the essay, he critiques classic German philosophical belief that religion shapes man. Instead, they are shaped by the point in history they were born in. Our relation to nature is historically specific. Human ideology, our belief system, consciousness, morality, religion, metaphysics, philosophy, etc. are all shaped by the modes of production. Your place in a social organization, and the overall conditions of the historical period will consequently shape your ideology. So, there is not a predisposed rationality within man. Rather, human rationality is a social product where different rationalities are produced in different periods. …show more content…
Nonetheless, needs also shape and modify the needs for future generations. Relating back to the example of the tribal family, their most basic and fundamental need is to acquire food and habitation. Tools —which are both manual tools and things like capitalism, modes of social organization, technology, physical implements, and socioeconomic relations — are created. So, a physical organization can help determine what exactly one’s needs are. When the family meets their first basic need, they have developed enough tools, such as slaves, to join other tribes and develop private

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The earliest families were known as the hunter-gatherers. The invention of the family ensured survival and emotional needs of the members were not an issue. With the family came a division of labor, food-sharing, long term relationships of reciprocity and obligation (Conway, 1997 pg. 11). A recent case study has shown that hunter gatherer families still exist today. The Urueu-Wau-Wau community in Brazil has become a living museum of the hunter gatherer family lifestyle (Holloway, 2003 pg.12). The members of the tribe do not wear clothes, they live in small villages, and the roles of men, women and children are clearly defined and…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secular Humanism, alternatively known as humanism, “involves an affirmation of immanent, this-worldly realities, alone with a denial or exclusion of transcendent, other-worldly realities”. Secular Humanism is its own belief system of rejecting God when man chooses to no longer be a subservient to a higher, supernatural authority. It is noted as a worldview and lifestyle oriented to the ungodly rather than the spiritual. Norman Richard describes man as “piece of work” which is ultimately called humanism. “If a human being is ‘a piece of work’, this suggests a workman who fashioned us – presumably a divine creator”. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of secular humanism, followed by an evaluation of objective criteria of…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud and Tillich

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    56: In a narrow sense, tools; its broader sense includes the skills or procedures necessary to make and use those tools. We have technology in our everyday life and can never get away from it. Even the little things we have like a dishwasher, washer, dryer, etc. While watching “The Harvest” I noticed that the only technology they had was mainly a cellphone or a camera. Even their washer/dryer was old and what people used back then that was unsafe. They did everything by hand basically and since they didn’t have money, working in the fields was complete labor. Around here, working in fields we have machines to use, and equipment, but for them they use their bare hands and a simple small basket, which means they can get hurt easily and especially for the kids, to go through all that labor for their age. The youngest age on the documentary was 12 years old and the things she was doing was a lot for her age. In the one scene she climbed on a ladder on a tree to pick apples and almost fell, her back was already hurting as well. They don’t have the technology like we do which isn’t a good thing because of the work they do can be dangerous and especially not good for the kids. Technology is important now but since they can’t get a high paying job they will never get through an education and technology to make things easier for their lives. Where they are also is extremely hot, they don’t even have the money to buy an air conditioner. Technology plays a huge role…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study9

    • 766 Words
    • 3 Pages

    -Things people believe are necessary for their everyday life. There are not just things that people require to stay alive. Needs can also be things that people consider necessary to maintain their lifestyle or quality of life.…

    • 766 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Summarize Max Weber’s ideas about religion, rather than economics, being the central force in social change.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thousands of years ago the Native Americans crossed the land-bridge. Then the Native Americans spit-up and settled and created the culture areas. Depending on the environments the Native Americans had different basic needs to survive such as clothing, food, and shelter.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Oxford English Dictionary defines the colloquial meaning of the word rational (of a person) as being “able to think clearly, sensibly and logically” (OED; 2004). The economist believes that rational people…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you allow science and technology to be your god and savior it is proof of a decaying society. If progress becomes more important than spirituality you begin to lose your soul, the very part of you that makes you human. Lenina’s complete lack of knowledge of God, religion, and faith show that even though there is little suffering in the New World, there is no real joy or happiness. True happiness can only come from faith and without it there can only be a mediocre existence. Lenina can not understand John’s religion, the Indian’s beliefs or anything that resembles faith. This is because the New World discourages anything but the present and physical pleasure. This keeps the citizens happy only because they have never experience true emotion.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this analysis paper I will talk about incorporating God throughout everyday life, whether it be through materialistic things or one’s own self perception of how it is to live and pattern after Godly ways . In “A World Split Apart,” Alexander Solzhenitsyn infers that there is a higher power than man; a lack of spirituality can harm ones afterlife. Through a higher power all things are possible he says, “If, as claimed by humanism, man were born only to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to death, his task on earth evidently must be more spiritual: not a total engrossment in everyday life, not the search for the best ways to obtain material goods and then their carefree consumption.” Whereas in “A Voice from Russia’s Past,” by Jack Fruchtman Jr. he simply argues that Solzhenitsyn is speaking from Slavophiles point of view, which stands as a group of Russian philologists and nationalists interested in the origins of the Russian language. Fruchtman also stated that Solzhenitsyn echoed this theme at Harvard when he noted that the philosophical foundation of the West has historically rested on a “rationalistic humanism,” by which he meant “the proclaimed and enforced autonomy of man from any higher force above him. (Fruchtman 44)” My last and final source will come from “Presenting Humanism” by Jende Huang. Huang speaks from a humanist view and states that our society has been so socialized to accept the idea that believing in God is something that is "good," and even for a religious liberal, there may exist, an unconscious desire to hold onto that. The realization that you don 't need a god to live your life is a difficult one and one that cannot be easily acknowledged.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many theorists have taken interest in religion for their fascination of its power to influence and shape human personality, behavior and action. Thomas Hobbes is one philosopher who attributed people’s clinging to religion as a logical alternative to find an acceptable explanation for things that are beyond their comprehension such as creation, the nature of things and ethics among others. Earlier philosophers adhered that the conception of religion is an inherent predilection of rational beings such that if lions and oxen have hands and feet, they too would conceive of a god that would look like a lion or an ox.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Policy

    • 6103 Words
    • 25 Pages

    References: 1. J Bradshaw, 1972, A taxonomy of social need, New Society ( March) 640-3.…

    • 6103 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two primary views on the issue of whether religion is a force for social change in society. Certain theorists adopt the view that religion is a conservative force, maintaining the status quo, whereas other theorists have the belief that religion is a force for social change, bringing about revolutions in society. With all views, the lack of a universal definition of religion remains a problem. Marx for example would argue that religion inhibits social change as it legitimises and justifies the status quo, whereas this contrasts Weber’s belief would be that religion can cause social change as it helped the development of capitalism.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A religion can be seen as a unified system of beliefs and practices which are relative to sacred things and beliefs (Giddens 1972, p.224). It can shape ones thoughts and feelings and gives people a sense of hope and something to believe in. All three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx's and Durkheim's thought will be compared and contrasted in order to determine the differences and similarities between their ideas. Finally, it will be explained which one of the theorists views and ideas are the most relevant to contemporary times and why.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays