Preview

Discourse On Inequality, By Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1275 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discourse On Inequality, By Rousseau
The concept of nature is very important in a lot of Rousseau philosophical work and the social contract is a good example of this. He puts forward the idea that that there is a covenant or social contract between members of society this idea is not a new one can be traced back to Plato’s Crito however Plato’s social contract is between the individual and the law not the will of the people(Plato 51 c 53a) He is famous for his common enlightenment position that we are better off being noble in our state of nature of noble savages this point is driven through more clearly in his work Discourse on Inequality, (Rousseau 1755) The Social Contract is more open to the view that we can benefit from modern society. He sets out to determine the basis …show more content…
His aim is rather to show the necessary constraints of political society can be legitimate and thereby compatible with, if not natural freedom, then an essential human freedom …show more content…
Rousseau thought is people are essentially good that we as evident by our virtue of compassion we are outgoing sharing people rather than closed nomads like the men of Hobbes state Hobbes views man as greedy and ruthless in nature and it is not a “war of all against all”(Hobbes1651) as Hobbes believes.(Bluhm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    For instance, as people start to build up their huts Rousseau says that “this was the epoch of a first revolution, which established and distinguished families, and introduced a kind of property, in itself the source of thousand quarrels and conflicts.” (Discourse on Inequality, p.8, § 10). Which means when private property is introduced, vice – versa in Hobbes arguments, disagreement, competition and distrust among people begins to play a part in the human nature. Briefly for Rousseau, by the time people quit living in a primitive state and a civil society is formed, organized in law system, specially in property rights, people lost their innocence and happiness, they start to fight each other; envy, hatred, dread of vengeance take place in the human nature. (Discourse on Inequality, p.9, § 18). So for Rousseau people completely changes, their nature does not consist gentleness any more, however, for Hobbes, human nature is still same as I cited before, the impulses are still in them and they has the will to keep, they only self – restraint. As a result of both assumptions it is true to say that for Rousseau, state of society is the state of war, however for Hobbes, state of nature equals to state of war of which civil society is the only cure for this endless war; this which reveal the disagreement among these political…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a group of individuals come together to live and work together for their own self-preservation, they sign intangible contracts know as social contracts which, in a sense, are agreements they make to live as a society. Jean-Jacques Rousseau talks about these ideas in Book II of On the Social Contract. These aren't so much simple things such as how food is attained or who will provide a certain service to the community. They are agreements that are at the root of their ability to cooperate and work with each other. While this branches to show a rather in-depth look at how groups organize into societies a focus will be leant to law and a person's role in society. In the mind or Rousseau, the type of society one enters through social contract…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Social Contract made some revolutionary points, that continue to be applicable to the world today. It impacted the American Government system by creating the idea of an agreement by society to abide by the rules of authority without force, and in return be rewarded with protection. To conclude, Rousseau’s ideas are wise and beneficial to the community because they create order without violent…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau's Argument

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    As a believer in the plasticity of human nature, Rousseau holds that good laws make for good citizens. However, he also believes people consist society for keeping a peace when individuals cannot keep a peace because of their own situations.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau believes that the reason for why man in his primitive state has far less problems than current day man is due to the faculty of…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Social Contract by Jean-Jacques Rousseau is a group of four books put together to discuss the importance of sovereignty and individual freedoms given within a group. He believed that true political authority can only come if all of the people in a state are in agreement over their mutual preservation. Rousseau was an active citizen during the pinnacle of the French Enlightenment period when everyone valued the powers of reason over blind faith. This is why he strongly believes that everyone should be able to think for themselves, instead of having a ruler that completely dictates their lives. Through an analysis of Rousseaus’ work, liberty and equality are shown to be very important to him and he wants his audience to understand this.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argued that man may have been born savage ,however only society can ignite deficient qualities. The final discourse: The Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract, is a promotional government idea that everything should be done for the “common good”. Rousseau’s discourse has influenced America’s current electoral voting system.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He’s saying government is just a link between the people and the sovereign. The sovereign is “people who give their consent enter into a civil society”. There’s a big difference between people who actually believe in the general will of the whole society and what each individual actually thinks about giving up all of their rights for the society.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jean Jacques Rousseau was a French rationalist who gave another elucidation to the hypothesis of Social Contract in his work "The Social Contract" and " Emile". As per him, social contract is not a chronicled truth but rather a theoretical development of reason. Preceding the Social Contract, the life in the Condition of Nature was glad and there was equity among men. As time passed, on the other hand, humankind confronted certain progressions. As the general populace expanded, the methods by which individuals could fulfill their needs needed to change. Individuals gradually started to live respectively in little families, and afterward in little groups. Divisions of work were presented, both inside and in the middle of…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person cannot talk about John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau first defining what each contract theorist means when he talks about the state of nature. For Locke, his state of nature involves “ungoverned humans pursuing their individual interests with respect for one another’s rights and even cooperate with one another with their interests overlap” (Portis, p. 103). These ungoverned humans are rational, resources are unconditional, and there is no threat from any external source. In Rousseau’s state of nature, not only is there no government, there is no social structure. That is, Rousseau takes the concept down to the bare bones. He creates an image where “human beings would not be distinguishable in any significant was from other mammals”…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social pact comes down to this; "Each one of us puts into the community his person and all his powers under the supreme direction of the general will; and as a body, we incorporate every member as an indivisible part of the whole (Rousseau: 61)". The general will can itself direct the forces of the state with the intention of the whole's primary goal - which is the common good. The general will does not allow private opinions to prevail. The union of the people, in its passive role is known as the State and is referred to as the Sovereign in its active state. Associates of the body politic are communally known as the people, and individually referred to as citizens or subjects. The primary problem to which the social contract holds the solution is based on the total alienation of each associate to the entire community. Rousseau proposes that every individual give himself absolutely and apply the same conditions for each and every one to result in an agreement where it is in no ones interest to make the conditions burdensome for others. The critiques of this contract are so specifically determined by ones actions, that the slightest amendment must make the agreement invalid; it is crucial to obtain a unanimous recognition and admittance by the whole. If the social pact is desecrated, every man regains his inborn rights to recover his natural freedom, and loses the civil freedom in which he bargained for. Stop. The existence of natural freedom is the argument in which I intend to pursue against Rousseau. This thought shall be revisited in a short while. Rousseau implies upon freedom the definition of the sovereign; it is a reason; a collaboration with others; a civil expression of the general will.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau's central aim in the Social Contract is to explain the sources and limits of legitimate authority. He believes that our duty towards the state stem from a social contract or social pact. By means of which groups of individuals are transformed into a body politic; a whole which has its own genuine will which is not necessarily from some of the individual wills of the people which is composed.…

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau challenged the present state of society around him by questioning the obsession over material possessions and the morality of a society. He stated that it was impossible for humans living in contemporary conditions to achieve moral and sincere lives due to the corruption of human nature. In the state of nature, humans were dignified beings, but civilization and increasing knowledge had corrupted these creatures to pursue their own selfish goals. According to Rousseau, society was created to nurture better people. In such a society is more important as a whole than its individual members because these members are merely a part of a larger group.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All about Rousseau

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rousseau’s view on human nature is quite interesting. As Rousseau discusses in one of his most famous work’s: The Social Contract, the state of nature is the hypothetical, prehistoric place and time where human beings live untouched by society. The most important characteristic of the state of nature is that people have full physical freedom and are at liberty to do as they wish. He believed that humans were essentially good when in their natural state before civilization, but thought humans were eventually corrupted by society. Unfortunately, the human nature also has a disadvantage that is that human beings have yet to discover rationality and morality. Also, Rousseau’s interpretation of the state of nature is entirely more positive than Hobbes’s thoughts on the same idea, who originated the term. He viewed the state of nature as almost a state of war and savagery. The two philosophers both had altering views of human nature, which Rousseau viewed as somewhat good and Hobbes saw as cruel and brutal. An important thing to add is that Rousseau recognized that even though we cannot ever return to the state of nature, understanding the concept will help society’s members be able to realize their natural goodness easier.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rousseau wrote The Social Contract in 1762. He saw the Social Contract as the solution to the problem of how man may obey his ruler but still remain free. Rousseau sought to balance the interests of the sovereign and subject so finely that he took the view that a breach of the social contract entitled the subject to return to their natural state of liberty. Rousseau argued that any loss of the rights handed up to the sovereign entitled the subject to revert back to their natural state. The state of nature was, in his eyes, a state of liberty (i.e. even a minor breach of the social contract entitled the aggrieved party to repudiate their agreement with the sovereign).…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays