Preview

Discourse Analysis on Winston Churchill and Tony Blair

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2822 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discourse Analysis on Winston Churchill and Tony Blair
Section 1
1.1 In this essay, I will be conducting a discourse analysis on a speech made by Winston Churchill in the 1940s, when he informed the British public that they will be entering war. I will use sociological research which examines the discourse of politics to supply context for this speech. My research topic is to discover in this essay is how Prime Ministers use persuasive techniques to win the support of the people. To achieve this, I will be comparing Churchill’s speech to Tony Blair’s speech in 2003 when he declared war on Iraq, to see what changes and similarities of discourses there are, regarding persuading and gaining the support of the people.
1.2 The consideration of the audience and their specific thoughts and feelings is certainly an essential theme when making a speech. Politicians use the spoken word to rule, inform, strengthen and communicate with the public in order to implement their own, or their party’s politics. As van Dijk puts it, “social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context (2001: 352).” If we are the people who vote to put these politicians in power, we ought to become more aware of the strategies and tactics behind their speeches. This will give us more opportunity of making a fair judgement of the real meaning of the message, rather than the persuasive and deceiving language that often clouds our judgement. I will be using critical discourse analysis and rhetorical political analysis as it is an approach that is suitable for written texts and helpful for discovering institutional meanings that lay hidden within rhetorical strategies. This method will facilitate me in finding the ideological dimension of discourse within the speeches I am analyzing (Cameron 2001:123).
1.3 Using critical discourse analysis I will analyse how the language used in political speeches functions as a type of social practice that “constructs the objects of



Bibliography: Books: Atkinson, J (1985) Structures of Social Action: Cambridge University Press Gee, J. P. (2005). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge Seale, Clive (2004) Researching society and culture: Sage Publications Ltd; Second Edition Wodak, Ruth (2000) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: London, Sage Publications Wood, Linda A (1997) www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/norman/critdiscanalysis.doc (online word document) Guardian: Full text: Tony Blair 's speech (2003) http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/mar/18/foreignpolicy.iraq1 (website article)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff’s. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff evaluate the Neo-Aristotelian style by stating, “The importance of this principle can scarcely be exaggerated; without it, modern speech criticism would not have been possible.”(464) They go on to explain that without this style speechmaking wouldn’t be as exceptional today and would be much like ancient rhetoric. They say, “The problem in the traditional system appears to be an omission rather than an inherent defect the genre and remain consistent with Aristotelian principles. Finding Rosenthal’s analysis of ethos suggestive, we approached the campaign oration as an instance of “personal persuasion.”(464) Where the crowd and audience act more or less like a judge of future events similar to that of an election. The speaker must be prepared to embrace the crowd while giving their speech. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff compare a variety of speech analyzation styles throughout their article however coming to an ultimate conclusion of the ability to critique comes strictly from the critic…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout history, the language of rhetoric has been harnessed and manipulated by public speakers throughout the world in order to effectively address key issues surrounding society and politics. The proposition that the enduring appeal of a speech lies in its ability to challenge and inspire is clearly demonstrated in both Anwar Sadat’s “Statement to the Knesset” (1977) and Paul Keating’s “Funeral Service for the Unknown Soldier” (1993). It is indeed the rhetorical treatment of the widely debated values in these speeches- whether it be for peace between two nations or simply the need for a stronger sense of national identity- that makes both these texts so influential in their enduring appeal.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    War, as defined by Merriam-Webster: Dictionary and Thesaurus, is a “state of hostility, conflict, or antagonism” (Merriam-Webster.com). Positivity, buoyancy, and optimism are on the complete other side of the spectrum. Yet, optimism is the best response to conflict, especially in a time of war. War is grim and brings out desperation; positivity is a response that serves to contrast with the brutal reality of war. A positive response will drastically change any mood, no matter how heavy or pessimistic; this is effortlessly shown in Winston Churchill's speech: Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat. In his speech, Churchill uses optimism to convince a nation to fight for their beliefs; the hope and confidence he shows in his country convinces his fellow…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the reading, “Composing for Recomposition: Rhetorical Velocity and Delivery” by Jim Ridolfo and Danielle Nicole Devoss, express the ideology of rhetorical delivery and rhetorical velocity digging deeper into the values of the terms in modern society. The authors define rhetorical delivery as a “remix culture” (Ridolfo and Devoss 516). That in today’s society, rhetorical delivery has gone further than just an oral side but has entered into an ethical and political aspect. The authors are trying to convey that rhetorical delivery has to grasp and engage with everyone in society, however, the concept might easy to achieve but still near impossible. At the same, it goes further in the political and ethical aspects by having societies voice their…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical perspectives in the field of communication offer dynamic looks into not only the field itself, but into the civic-life aspect of this field, also called “lifeworld”. A lifeworld, according to Habermas, is all the immediate experiences, activities, and contacts that make up the world of an individual or corporate life. Specifically, Contemporary Rhetorical Theory offers a way to understand the communicative process and what the communicative process is. Contemporary Rhetoric itself is not communication - rather, it provides important aspects into understanding what communication is; rhetoric is praxis. “Praxis is when theory and action are combined…” (Farrell, 1999). Contemporary Rhetorical Theory establishes theoretical assumptions of human society and the communicative act, as well as, test those assumptions by analyzing human society through the everyday civic life. “…rhetoric derives its materials from the real conditions of civic life, the appearances of our cultural world. At the same time, this activity makes room for disputation about the meaning, implications, direction, and…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two Australian Speeches

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An orator’s ability to utilise speech structure permits them to not only convey their ideas efficiently, but also to help achieve a social change and improvement. This notion of social change is at the heart of any successful speech. The idea of “parts to the whole” is shown in both Paul Keating’s Funeral Service of the Unknown Soldier and Margaret Atwood’s Spotty Handed Villainesses. The structure and language of a speech are important aspects as they let the orator provide their argument in an effective way and thus bring about a social change in a number of ways that are pertinent to the audience and context.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is the “reoccurring ways of speaking that challenge societies taken for granted assumptions and offer alternatives to prevailing discourse.”(Cox 68) Critical Discourse challenges socially dominant ideas or beliefs. The value comes from the timing in which I learned it. During election season, I was looking for someone to challenge many of the ideas that have become dominant over the past few decades. Unfortunately, neither candidate did much to appease that desire. For instance, sustainability was yet again a “boring” topic to our media and did not get the airtime and attention it warranted. However, it is encouraging that one can slowly start to see more of this Critical Discourse in other parts of the media. Conversely, Critical Discourse has caused massive division in the American community. People have used it to contest everything that does not agree with their dogmata, but the problem comes when one disagrees without knowing what they are fighting for. Discourse in America is more important now than…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump Rhetoric

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Famous philosopher and poet, Aristotle, once described, “[rhetoric] may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art.” Thus, rhetoric is a form of clear, perceptible language which leads its observers to make a specific and calculated conclusion. Many consider politicians to be the most avid users of rhetoric, constantly trying to convince audiences to vote or certain way or to shift the national political agenda in a direction that fits their means. In many cases, politicians are accused of being liars or untruthful for doing so. Contrary, others consider politicians to be masters of languages, constantly formulating methods to make their arguments more…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, the primary method of expressing oneself has been through language, from the lyrics of songs to emotion packed novels and countless other forms. In George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, the society of a nation known as Oceania is under constant control and surveillance from a government called the Party. The Party’s stability and continued power rely on the inability of the people to have emotions or thoughts, as that could lead to rebellion. In order to control the people, the Party manipulated the language by using its slogans and a language known as Newspeak. The implementation of Newspeak and other manipulations of language were done with the purpose of limiting and distorting the public’s ability to express their thoughts and feelings by eliminating or mutating the meanings of the words necessary to do so.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this study, we found that the examination of a legislator’s discourse uncovers their identity as a man. In addition, dialect highlights helps government officials correspondence their belief system and diminishes the extension between the lawmakers and the individuals. As per the dialog above, we can abridge the elements of Barak Obama's discourse as the fallowing. Obama utilized short words , and sentences , also he concentrated on the present tense, calling the gathering of people to make a move now and help settle the nation, his most utilized modular is the modular ( can ), third his most utilized pronoun is (we) on the grounds that the message he is wanting to convey is solidarity . Forward, the discourse demonstrations that he concentrated…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As public figures with longstanding reputations for political activism within their respective countries, all three speakers considered in this essay (Paul Keating, Noel Pearson and Aung San Suu Kyi) have a strong and positive ethos (although their political opponents may contest this). Each of them also exhibits a high degree of logos in their speeches, utilising various rhetorical devices to rationally convey their messages and persuade their audiences. However, the differing contexts for each speech has influenced the specific devices used, and also determined the degree and use of pathos.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarity and simplicity, the only two factors that keep it real; at least the only two factors that help the readers understand the truth. Politics is always a tough thing to talk about, to follow, to express and even to educate yourself about. In the essay written by George Orwell “ Politics and the English Language” he deliberately expresses that writing of today isn’t the same writing of yesterday. In other words, George Orwell expresses his thoughts; today we have developed habits both bad and good, which can challenge truth behind the text and can manipulate the reader’s understanding.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Participation

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Yet, political discussion may be either expressive or instrumental. If the aim is just to inform others about one’s position, than the discussion may be regarded as expressive. However, the discussion…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    © Jonathan Charteris-Black 2005 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2005 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries. ISBN 1–4039–4689–2 hardback This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Charteris-Black, Jonathan, 1955– Politicians and rhetoric : the persuasive power of metaphor / Jonathan Charteris-Black. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN…

    • 91317 Words
    • 366 Pages
    Powerful Essays