Preview

Difference Between General Intent Crimes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
228 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between General Intent Crimes
The difference between general intent crimes and specific intent crimes are as follows:
General intent crimes are crimes that a person knowingly and willingly commits recklessly or negligently ("General Intent vs Specific Intent Crimes - List of Crimes", 2012).
An example of a general intent crime would be rape. In criminal law, the prosecution does not have to prove that a person intended to rape another individual, The prosecution only has to show that a rape has occurred ("Rape-Specific Or General Intent Crime?", 1958).
Another example of a general intent crime would be arson. Again, in criminal law, the prosecution does not have to prove that a person intended to burn down a building, the prosecution only has to show that the building was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sally gave her mechanic a check for $300 in payment for car repairs. The bank dishonored her check because her account balance was less than $200. Sally could be prosecuted for uttering a forged instrument.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    One element that normally must exist for a person to be convicted of a crime is the performance of a prohibited act.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first general feature of crime is that there has to be an act in violation of the law.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grade 12 Law Exam Review

    • 4637 Words
    • 19 Pages

    * The accused can’t be convicted of aiding in the commission of a crime that he does not know is intended…

    • 4637 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Intentional torts: harm caused by deliberate action. Ex: newspaper columnist who wrongly accuses someone of being a drunk has committed intentional torts…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 outline

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    h. Strict liability statutes- crimes for which one may incur liability without fault or intent…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    General: principles that apply to more than one crime. Special: explains specific crimes and arranges them into groups according to subject matter. The special part of criminal law defines specific crimes, according to the principles set out in the general part. Four groups: Crimes against persons, Crimes against property, Crimes against public order and morals, and Crimes against the state. Pg. 15…

    • 1491 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    HSC PREP

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Recklessness: The accused was aware that what they were doing could lead to a crime being committed but chose to do it anyway.…

    • 5612 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The doctrine of transferred intent is acting with the purpose or intent to do harm to a specific individual yet, the intended target is not harmed but another bystander is harmed instead (General Elements of Crimes, 2010). An example of transferred intent would be the case that was in the news of an eleven (11) year old boy that was subsequently shot in the head as a result of transferred intent. Keon Malone was the eleven (11) year old that was an innocent bystander when he was shot while in his mother’s home through the door. Brandon Scott fired his weapon at the apartment next door to where Malone was, but the bullet did not hit his intended victim. As a result of Brandon Scotts’ recklessness, Keon Malone now has permanent mental and physical…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Intent is inferred from an accused's behavior. Like a person would have intended the natural and probable consequences of their acts (Mallor et al., 2015). The requirement for the intent is the criminal law's general goal of punishing aware criminals. The proof that the defendant would need to form an intent is a "traditional prerequisite of criminal responsibility" (Mallor et al., 2015). An example of criminal intent would be that Katie and Tally were at the Michael Kors store…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Categories Of Crime

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page

    Chapter 3 discusses the nature and purpose of criminal laws. The types of laws include: criminal law, civil law, administrative law, and case law. Categories of crime are differentiated by felonies and misdemeanors. The eight general features of crime determine if the crime was acted a certain away. The crime must consist of: actus reus, mens rea, or both. Concurrence consist of both actus reus and mens rea, which many crimes usually have. Causation, harm, legality, punishment and attendant circumstances are included with the general features of crime. Also, types of defenses give the perpetrator a way of defending themselves in court. The defenses are alibi, justification, excuse, and procedural defenses. However, justification defenses are…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts

    • 18542 Words
    • 1 Page

    Intentional Interference With Person or Property A. Intent 2 types 1. Specific Intent consciously desiring the physical result 2. General Intent knowledge that the result is substantially certainty to follow -The Restatement places torts somewhat on a continuum with Negligence The most culpable form of intent would be a specific intent, or morally apprehensible form of misconduct you swing a baseball bat to hit someone in the face General intent would be next on the continuum knowing with substantial certainty Recklessness- Callous disregard ( I dont give a crap. Gross Negligence- aware of the harm but you are indifferent to it Negligence- foreseeable risk of harm but you fail to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances Most culpable (responsible/punishable)…

    • 18542 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. For a crime to be committed, the prosecutor must be able to prove a criminal intent and an overt act to carry out that intent. Jack and Mary agreed to rob a series of banks. Prior to beginning their bank robbery spree, they were arrested and charged with criminal conspiracy. What act did Jack and Mary do that justifies a finding that they committed the crime? Explain.…

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The individual committing the crime was aware of the risk of injury and willfully disregarded it (Involuntary Manslaughter, 2010).…

    • 3740 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Mere intentions do not make a criminal offence – there must be a criminal act or omission…

    • 991 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays