Preview

Essay On Statutory Offenses

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Statutory Offenses
What is meant by the phrase “crimes are statutory offenses”?

The meaning of the phrase "crimes are statutory offenses" is that in order for the government to convict a defendant of a crime, the government must (1) demonstrate that the suspect acts disobey a criminal statute; (2) prove a reasonable doubt that the suspect committed the acts; and (3) prove that the suspect had the capacity to form a criminal intent (Mallory et al., 2015, pg. 135). Since the definition of statutory offenses means "the wrong punishable under a statue, rather than at common law" (dictionary.com, n.d). An example of a statutory offenses would be like someone who is driving under the influences (DUI) or even someone who was harassing someone. Explain Criminal Intent.

Criminal Intent is inferred from an accused's behavior. Like a person would have intended the natural and probable consequences of their acts (Mallor et al., 2015). The requirement for the intent is the criminal law's general goal of punishing aware criminals. The proof that the defendant would need to form an intent is a "traditional prerequisite of criminal responsibility" (Mallor et al., 2015). An example of criminal intent would be that Katie and Tally were at the Michael Kors store
…show more content…
159). The issues with the Double Jeopardy Clause is that the clause does not prevent the possibility that a single criminal act may lead to more than one prosecution. "One criminal act can produce several statutory violations. But a single criminal act with multiple victims could result in several prosecutions because the identity of each victim would be an additional fact or element of proof in each case” (Mallor et al., 2015, pg.159). Also, the Double Jeopardy Clause “does not bar a private plaintiff from pursuing a civil case” (Mallor et al., 2015,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Status Offenses Essay

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I want you to know the truth behind status offenses. Status offenses are acts considered criminal only when committed by a juvenile (Muscari, 2010). These restrictions are incorporated to minors to promote school attendance, return home at a safe hour or avoid use and addiction of nicotine, alcohol, or illegal drugs. The consequences of being charged with a status offense range from deferred adjudication, probation, or boarding at a state school or other facility. I bring this to attention to discuss the problems with status offenses in regards to the system in place, the juveniles and a possible way to help solve underlying problems. Many causes of status offense include poverty, chronic illness, negative peers, neglectful or abusive family,…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Stacia Tauscher once said “we worry about what a child will become tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today.” For my opinion is true, young offender population has increased of the years. Parents may be worried about their children's future instead of watching them while they’re are in their sights.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 5th Amendment under the constitution protects offenders against the double jeopardy, it prohibits and offender from being tried for the same offense twice. “the Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy protects the accused from being prosecuted more than once for the same crime.” (Wright, 2013, Section 13.1) For example, if there were an acquittal in a case determined by a judge an offender was being charged for murder, and new evidence has been found the offender can’t tried for murder. Yes, a person can be charged with multiple crimes for one act. Say for instance if a person was to rob a bank and some people were killed during the armed robbery, the offender can be charged for each person death and also armed robbery. A lesser…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fifth amendment prohibits double jeopardy (del Carmen, 2014). The concept behind prohibiting double jeopardy is to protect the defendant from being tried and punished twice for a single crime, but this doesn’t mean that after a verdict is handed down the process ends (del Carmen, 2014). They can try and get an appeal so that their case and verdict will be reviewed (del Carmen, 2014).…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deft’s murder charge: A murder charge against Deft is proper if the facts show that Deft committed a homicide with malice. It is clear that Deft committed a homicide (unlawful killing of another) because Deft shot and killed Kyle. The issue is whether the killing was committed with malice.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 21 Crimes Essay

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Use each key term below in a sentence that shows the meaning of the term.…

    • 2156 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 1 Open Book Questions

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Criminal law—conduct at issue is offensive to society in general, issue is detrimental to society as a whole, the law involves public offenses (robbery, murder, assault), and purpose is to punish for the crime and deter and prevent further crimes…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies Crime Essay

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Statutory and judicial guidelines inform the exercise of judicable discretion in the area of sentencing. These guidelines aim to provide greater uniformity in sentencing matters and enhance the integrity of the process. Judicial guidelines are judgements from superior courts that aim to structure discretion, this is shown in the case R v Jurisic (1998), this case was used by the Criminal Court of Appeals to set guidelines that any non-custodial sentence for culpable driving should be exceptional. Judges are bound to any relevant legislation which impacts upon the sentencing process such as: The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) this prescribes the maximum sentence that may be imposed for various offences. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) this prescribes general guidelines in relation to sentencing. For example it identifies what might constitute a mitigating or aggravating circumstance. However, it is left to the exercise of judicial discretion as to how much weight should be given to such circumstances. Mandatory sentencing takes away the exercise of judicial discretion. The court has no choice but to impose the legislated sentence. Amendments to the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), have prescribed minimum non-parole periods for specific offences, such as ten years for aggravated sexual assault. The provision of statutory and judicial guidelines means that limits are placed on a judge’s discretion when sentencing, and this ensures sentencing consistency. However, some people feel that judges still have too much discretion when sentencing, and that some sentences are too lenient. Link…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. For a crime to be committed, the prosecutor must be able to prove a criminal intent and an overt act to carry out that intent. Jack and Mary agreed to rob a series of banks. Prior to beginning their bank robbery spree, they were arrested and charged with criminal conspiracy. What act did Jack and Mary do that justifies a finding that they committed the crime? Explain.…

    • 905 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A movement has taken hold of our country to change the juvenile justice system, and erase any distinction between young offenders and adult criminals. Almost all fifty states have changed their juvenile justice laws, allowing more youths to be tried as adults and scrapping long-time efforts to help rehabilitate delinquent kids and prevent future crimes. It seems to be plain and simple, a minor in this country is defined as a person under the age of eighteen. How then can we single out certain minors and call them adults? Were they considered adults before they carried out an act of violence? No. How then, did a violent act cause them to cross over a line that is defined by age? The current debate over juvenile crime is being dominated by two voices: elected officials proposing quick-fix solutions, and a media more intent on reporting violent crimes than successful prevention efforts. Minors should not be tried as adults in our society today. This is obvious through looking at propositions by our government such as Proposition 21, which is statistics on juvenile crime from specific cases where minors were sentenced in adult courts.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Juveniles Essay

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The argument of sentencing juveniles for heinous crimes has been an issue for many years. Some believe that the sentencing of juveniles sufficient in trying to rehabilitate them and some feel sentencing is insufficient. Some crimes, like murder, are so heinous that no matter what the person’s age is that they deserve to lose their freedom. It is believed that juveniles are not ready to take the blame for their actions like an adult would because they are not mentally able to handle the judicial systems. Imprisonment is traumatic, and I am sure more so for juveniles; everyone must be accountable for their actions especially in order to learn from their consequences they receive.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    in a very basic sense, crime is a legal concept: what makes some conduct criminal, and other…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to convict a criminal, prosecutors are required to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The most common criminal defenses fall under two categories, excuse and justification. An excuse is when a person admits to committing a criminal act but believes that he or she can’t be held responsible because there was no criminal content. Some excuses used in court today are; mental disorder, infancy (age), mistake of fact, mistake of law and automatism. In justification defenses, the accused admits to wrongdoing but argues that he or she should be freed from culpability or assessed reduced liability for the crime due to mitigating circumstances surrounding offense. These defenses are factors that excuse a competent person from liability for…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American Law Essay

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Secondary sources are not the actual laws but instead, are writings about the laws ex; encyclopedias and digest, and books like our school book where we find our research. This source is used to gather information on certain cases. Secondary sources are a great way to fully understand an area of law or learn the court language. It also gives you an overall view of an area and point the research to the appropriate primary source.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    mala in se, which includes acts, such as murder, so offensive to morals as to be…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays