Diana Meyer Personal Socialization Summary

In Card’s argument, she centralizes the abandonment of marriage and its entirety since it jeopardizes a woman’s autonomy to marry, seek long-term relationships and even be single. In opposition, Feminist, Diana Meyers, has a piece on Personal Autonomy and the Paradox of Feminine Socialization, which strongly supports the theory of autonomy deriving from the self while considering environmental stimuli. Meyers persistently magnifies the belief that autonomy is defined by expressing your true self by avoiding conformist attitudes, recognizing the need for inner change, as well as considering internal reflections and external guidance from the outside world. Like Card, Meyers believes that raw, authentic choices from the self is what makes up
The concept of self-rule can be defined by the realms of authentic choices and environmental influences, such as the State. Similar to Rich’s theory of self-rule, Meyers believes that the equilibrium between the integrity of the self, people, and their projects is key to autonomy and consequently embraces the self. These ideas support Meyer’s argument because when we are readily endorsing the inner self and regarding other external motives, all women should have the opportunity to autonomously decide to seek their own lifestyle whether it being a heteronormative marriage, polyamorous relationship, or even remaining single because the abstraction of autonomy is not entirely derived from the self alone. Conclusively, it can be conceived that if an individual disagrees with the statutes of today’s form of marriage, then it is possible that they can autonomously decide not to marry if it’s against their authenticity, as well as disagreeing with their situational circumstances and vice