Preview

Devis V. Davis Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
981 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Devis V. Davis Case Summary
"The Essence of the Epoche"
In the Supreme Court ruling of Davis v. Davis, Justice Daughtrey created an epoche of the law when she, unlike previous judges, based her decision on the recognition of a new category more relevant to the case rather than relying on one previously established. She casts aside conventional thoughts and residual knowledge by declaring the case to present a "question of first impression" which will require the court to act through common law. Although Justice Daughtrey relates other statutes, cases, and constitutions to the case, she refuses to follow any precedent established by similar situations. Establishing Davis v. Davis to be a case of "first impression" because it lacks a controlling contract or statute, Justice Daughtrey begins to introduce facts regarding the case: Mr.
…show more content…
Davis have been married for nine years. Mr. Davis is thirty years of age, and Mrs. Davis is twenty-eight years of age. Together, the couple earns roughly $35,500 annually, with Mr. Davis earning $17,500 and Mrs. Davis earning $18,000. Mrs. Davis is currently a resident of the state of Florida. The couple desired a family, but were deterred by Mrs. Davis's five tubal pregnancies and a surgical treatment that rendered it impossible for her to conceive naturally. Having suffered considerable trauma and pain from attempts to conceive, it was concluded Mrs. Davis's only option to conceive was through in vitro fertilization. In 1985, the couple became familiar with and participated in an in vitro fertilization program. After six failed attempts to conceive through in vitro fertilization, the Davis' suspended their involvement in the program and opted to obtain a child through adoption. When adoption attempts failed, the couple returned to the in vitro fertilization program. In 1988, Mrs. Davis learned of a new cryopreservation program, and, after discussing the information with Mr. Davis, again reentered the program with the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper I will discuss the case of Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County. In this case Joseph Herrera an employee at the detention center was accused of sexually harassing the female inmates. Herrera’s supervisor at MVH where he was employed, advise Herrera that they will taking actions to discipline him due to the complaints and Herrera resigns. Herrera asks his employers to give him a letter of recommendation for an employer he was applying for and the supervisors give him an outstanding recommendation. His supervisors neglect to tell the prospective employer that at the time of his employment he was under investigation for sexual harassment. Because they did not disclose that information they employed Herrera and he repeated his actions.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Taxpayers could deduct expense they substantiated with receipts and showed were related to their activities. But taxpayers were denied deductions for expenses they didn’t substantiate or show were related to…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2000, the Arlington Police Department received information stating that Earnest Leon Voyles had exchanged emails that contained sexual content with a fifteen year old girl from London, England. According to this informant the fifteen year old girl, “Amy Chang”, had been solicited for sex by Voyles and had arranged to meet with her in London to engage in a sexual relationship. Sergeant James Crouch of the Arlington Police Department was unsuccessful in contacting “Amy Chang” to verify the arrangement but was not successful, however, he was successful in verifying that Voyles was working as a teacher at a junior high located in Arlington, Texas.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Virginia on April 7th 2003 a divided United States Supreme Court opened the possibility of constitutionally restricting certain types of hate speech. The court was to hear a case that spoke to one specific Virginia state statute that prohibited cross burning with the intent to intimidate, and also rendered that any such burning shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group. This court would see this statute being used between two separate cases. The first case was against Barry Black; in August of 1998 Black led a Ku Klux Klan rally at which the conclusion resulted in the burning of a cross on private property with the permission of the owner. Black was charged under the state statute, “Burning a cross with the intent to intimidate.” [347] The jury was instructed in accordance with the Model Jury Instruction that the burning of the cross by itself is sufficient evidence from which you may infer the required intent. [364] In May 1998 Richard Elliot and Jonathan O’Mara attempted to burn a cross on the lawn of Elliot’s neighbor and were charged in accordance under the cross-burning statute. After all of the respondents were convicted, they appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia arguing that the cross-burning statute is unconstitutional. The Virginia Supreme court reversed all the convictions holding that the Virginia cross-burning statute is analytically indistinguishable from the ordinance found…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case District of Columbia ( DC ) vs Heller an officer for DC got declined for the permit to have a gun in his home for the year. After this he decided that this was unfair and took it to court. He pointed out that he was a police officer and he carries a firearm with him at all times for the protection of others and himself, but the court denied him the right to have a firearm for the protection of him and his family. The constitutional issue with this case is the fact that it’s how DC wanted gun owners to break down their guns, have a trigger lock on it, and keep the ammo away from the firearm even though the gun is broken down without the trigger lock.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Maguire, M. Esq. (2011, January 24). Truth and consequences: navigating the minefield of references for dangerous former employees. Retrieved from http://www.diogenesllc.com/referencesarticle.pdf…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: This lawsuit involves Dred Scott, an African American slave and his owner due to the passing of his previous owner Dr. Emerson, John F. A. Sanford. John F.A Sanford is the brother to the wife of Dr. Emerson. Dred Scott sued for his freedom in the Missouri Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis on April 6, 1846 . Dred Scott’s legal suit is for assault and false imprisonment: “A slave could be punished and kept as property, but a free person could not.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the Civil War, the constitution did not provide a clear answer for deciding whether or not a slave had the same rights as a person. The federal government faced a divided country, and passed laws enforcing the return of slaves to their owner’s states, such as the Fugitive Slave Act. Contradicting this were “personal liberty laws,” which allowed states to decide who would be considered a person in their territory. However, both the Fugitive Slave Act and “personal liberty laws” were challenged in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. The ambiguity of the constitution would lead to a four-year-long war between the Northern and Southern states.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shelby County v. Holder 570 U.S. __ (2013) was a United States Supreme Court case concerning Section 5 and Section 4 of The Voting Rights Act of 1965. Section 5 forbids any state or district, that is an eligible voter discrimination area, from making any changes to their election process without federal permission. Section 4 labels a state or district as eligible if said state or district had a literacy test or any other unfair device in place as of November 1, 1964. Section 4 also clarifies how the Justice Department enforces Section 5 of The Voting Rights Act, so if Section 4 is found unconstitutional, then Section 5 can’t be kept either.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A2 OCR Law - Intention

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The judges however, acknowledged that the flexibility of a subjective test proposed great difficulties for interpreting common law in a pattern that provided fairness, consistency, and clarity to all involved in the case and for these reasons among others it is understood why an objective measure was introduced in the subsequent case of R v Caldwell [1982].…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Brown contends that he had a firm constitutional right to stand up and support Jennings if he so chose to. As with any Constitutional right, this right must be allowed except when it begins to interfere and infringe on the ability of educators to safely and effectively carry out their duties to other students. Brown v. Cabell, 598.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Dred Scott v. Sandford the case started in 1856 and ended in 1857. “The Supreme Court decided that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. Finally, the Court declared that the rights of slaveowners were constitutionally protected by the Fifth Amendment because slaves were categorized as property.” - Alex McBride (McBride 2006, 411). The verdict was unlawful and absurd.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott made history by launching a legal battle to gain his freedom. That he had lived with Dr. Emerson in free territories become the basis for his case.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What does freedom of expression really mean? Why is it important to our democratic society? In the landmark case of R. v. Keegstra (1990), the issues of freedom of expression and hate speech is brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada. The case also deals with issues of whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) and section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The courts view that the objectives of having freedom of speech are correlated with democracy in the sense that for members of society to have their voices heard, they must be free to speak on matters that provide value back to society. This case has served as precedence for other freedom of expression cases. R. v. Keegstra can be looked at through many of the legal principles, but for the purposes of this essay, I will focus on the Offense Principle. This principle, brought forward by Joel Feinberg, is a tangent of John Mill’s Harm Principle, which deals with non-physical harm, such as hate speech. This is evident when looking at R. v. Keegstra, as the Offense Principle is the best principle to articulate why the dissenting judges ruled the way they did. I believe that the lead dissenting judge, Beverly McLachlin, ruled accurately in her judgement and I intend to support this ruling throughout this essay. As well, I will provide a summery of R. V. Keegstra, look at Philosophical principles as…

    • 2805 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays