Preview

Voyles V. the State of Texas Court Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Voyles V. the State of Texas Court Case Summary
In 2000, the Arlington Police Department received information stating that Earnest Leon Voyles had exchanged emails that contained sexual content with a fifteen year old girl from London, England. According to this informant the fifteen year old girl, “Amy Chang”, had been solicited for sex by Voyles and had arranged to meet with her in London to engage in a sexual relationship. Sergeant James Crouch of the Arlington Police Department was unsuccessful in contacting “Amy Chang” to verify the arrangement but was not successful, however, he was successful in verifying that Voyles was working as a teacher at a junior high located in Arlington, Texas. Working with the information provided by the informant, Sergeant Crouch, sent an email to Voyles describing himself as a fifteen year old girl named “C.J. Best” on December 28, 2000. In this email “C.J. Best” told Voyless that she was looking for a new chat buddy and that she had gotten his address through some friends and that she lived in Forth Worth, Texas. About two and a half hours later Voyles responded to the email indicating that he was interested in being chat buddies with “C.J. Best.” On January 19, 2001, after several emails were exchanged between Voyles and “Best” Sergeant Crouch obtained search warrants for Voyles home and work computers where the Arlington Police Department found and “seized child pornography off the hard drives of each unit.” Voyles was charged and indicted for possession of child pornography which is a third degree felony. In 2002, alleging that the evidence that the Arlington Police Department obtained from both his home and work computers was inadmissible claiming an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution and article I of the Texas Constitution, Voyles filed a motion to suppress. The Fourth Amendment and Article I of the Texas Constitution provides that a defendant has standing to challenge the admission


References: 133 S.W.3d 303; 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2728. Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com.tamusa.idm.oclc.org/hottopics/lnacademic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Van Orden v. Perry

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thomas Van Orden, an American Lawyer, challenged the State of Texas claiming that the placement of the Ten Commandment monument on state capital grounds was unconstitutional because it symbolized government endorsement of religion, violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment (Van Orden v. Perry Case Brief). The Supreme Court held the monument constitutional as it was merely a recognition of the Ten Commandment in American history and served no religious purposes (Van Orden v. Perry). The Supreme Court also noted that many other government buildings, including itself, have some form of the Commandments as the recognition of its important historical meaning as a source of law (Van Orden v. Perry).…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was my day off but I still had some errands to run throughout the day. As I began with paying bill the curiosity peaked my mind to find out more about Aiden’s indecent exposure charges. As I began looking deeper and deeper within the online documents, I began to get a curtly feeling about my quick assumption that it was Aiden Clifton. Aiden’s indecent exposure charges were not what I had expected them to be, there was nothing that even involved children. Apparently last summer while out boating, Aiden was relieving himself off the back of the boat when another boat passed by and called him in.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. The petitioner, Timothy Hurst, was convicted of first degree murder and the jury recommended the death penalty to the judge in Florida, who then sentenced Hurst to death. Hurst appealed to the Florida Supreme Court and was granted resentencing. The Florida Supreme Court rejected Hurst’s argument and reaffirmed his sentence. The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bob Perez Essay

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the years of 1994-1995, Wenatchee Washington, had been known historically for the most extensive child sex abuse investigation. This case was particularly not only extensively long, but later being founded that Bob Perez, a Wenatchee police investigator, was the reason why many were convicted and prisoned. Bob Perez was the reason behind this extensively hurtful case by the desire of greed, proving a lack of empathy, dishonesty, and inconsiderate. Perez was not only known as an abusive police investigator, but an untrustworthy man and authority.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zelman V. Simmons-Harris

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case of Zelman v. Simmons-Harris is a landmark case that dealt with vouches for schooling and the 1st Amendment. The case was officially decided upon on June 27, 2002, but the case and history dates back to 1995. In 1995, the Ohio Legislature passed into law the Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program as part of the 1995 budget act. The Cleveland Scholarship and Tutoring Program was a pilot program that gave families up $2,250 to support their children’s academics. Aid was given to parents according to financial need, and where the aid was spent depended upon where parents chose to enroll their children. Parents were able to opt out of the public school system with this money if they were a part of a failing school district. It allowed parents to choose the school that their children would attend. (Bodwell, 2003)…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Firearms

    • 2908 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Swanson, Charles R., Neil C. Chamelin, Leonard Territo, Robert W. Taylor. Criminal Investigation. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2006.…

    • 2908 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Punishment is the outcome to every wrong doing someone does. However, there's usually a loop hole to a crime that ends up changing the final sentence . In the case of Carmell Vs. Texas, the crime that the defendant was charged on, had occurred during the time in which the state of Texas had changed the law on the action he was accused for commiting. All Scott Carmell needed to avoid life in prison for sexually assaulting his stepdaughter was a good lawyer. It is often difficult to ascertain whether a given change in the law hurts the defendant, helps him, or is neutral.But for Carmell the law spoke in his favor.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the federal constitution could be improved if it was more in-depth as the Texas constitution. I agree that both framers of the constitution wanted limited government; however, it looks like Texas has done a better job with their constitution.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the recess of the Chung case, Judge Moore motioned to move forward with the next case. The defendant Jeffrey Gaddy was presented to the court was along with Mr. Francisco. Once Mr. Francisco was sworn into court, defense attorney Clayton asked him to recall the incident. Mr. Francisco stated that the defendant Jeffery Gaddy was accused of burglary and breaking into the backdoor and two offices within ACE Tree Service. The officer on duty responded to the initially burglary call and found Mr. Gaddy fleeing from the scene of the crime.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R15523, 17425. Rivera now said he was walking on Hickory Street when Holly Staker, who was wearing a sleeveless shirt and a pair of tight shorts, invited him up to the apartment. Rivera said it was dark in the apartment and a little boy and girl were playing inside. Id. At one point, Holly Staker changed the little girl’s diaper. Rivera stated that Holly Staker then changed into a nightgown and tried to seduce him, but he resisted her advances. At this point, the little boy went outside to play. Rivera continued that Holly Staker persisted in her sexual advances and they had intercourse, although he did not think he ejaculated because he was concerned about pregnancy. The sexual activity was interrupted when the little girl cried in the next room, and Rivera decided he did not want to continue. At this point, according to Rivera’s statement, Holly Staker got angry that he refused to continue having sex and brandished a knife, which she began swinging at Rivera. Rivera said he grabbed her arms and started punching her without realizing the knife was cutting her. He did not know how many times he cut her, but it was more than twice. Rivera stated that he washed the knife and his hands near the kitchen sink and ran out the back door of the apartment. He threw the knife, which he had broken into two pieces, to the ground. Rivera said he then went home and burned his clothes in the dumpster behind his house, after which he walked back to Hickory Street and saw the police and the woman for whom Holly Staker was babysitting. R14617-25, 15475-84,…

    • 4813 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Harrison Jr. the plaintiff filed a complaint with the EEOC against the defendant Killeen Fast- Food Restaurant (Wendy’s) for refusal to hire him based on his hearing impairment despite his qualifications. The EEOC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Waco Division, the general manager of the restaurant refused to hire…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case was granted writ of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 and argued on Wednesday, October 10, 2012. The petitioner in this case is Abigail N. Fisher and the respondent is the University of Texas at Austin. Fisher filed suit with the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the court decided in favor of the University of Texas. The state of Texas has legislature that was enacted in 1997 that requires the admission into the University of Texas of all students that rank in the top 10% of their high school graduating class. The petitioner was not in this category, and was therefore judged on admission according to other factors. She was denied admission, and therefore sued the University based on violation of her Fourteenth Amendment Rights under the Equal Protection Clause.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court’s decision on the case of Texas v. Johnson has been a controversial one, as it involves the burning of our national symbol, the American flag. It leads to the question: Does the desecration of the American flag a way of expressing speech that is protected by the first amendment? Shouldn't the destruction of a true American symbol be protected and preserved, as it is a symbol that represents our country? There is a great amount of criticism that Texas v. Johnson has been faced with; most of which are valid points that could contribute to possibly overriding this decision of Texas v. Johnson in the future.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boerum Case Study

    • 4801 Words
    • 20 Pages

    § 3731, appealing the district court's ruling against the Government on the motion in limine and the motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum. (R. at 38). The court affirmed the district court's decision, ruling, in part, that the statements fail as a matter of law to qualify as excited utterances. (R. at 43). The Fourteenth Circuit also found the statements to be barred by the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. Washington. (R. at 45). The court further upheld the district court's decision to quash the subpoena duces tecum, finding that Boyd v. United States still governed with respect to the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause. (R. at 49). Accordingly, the court found that the compelled production of Respondent's diary was unconstitutional. (R. at 48).…

    • 4801 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jake although not convicted of child pornography charges did in fact commit an illegal act in this regard. Child pornography is defined by HG.org, in…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays