Preview

Developed Countries Do Not Have Responsibility to Help

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
688 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Developed Countries Do Not Have Responsibility to Help
Introduction In recent years, we can know the situations that many poor people in undeveloped countries are suffering from hunger and various epidemics by the television and the Internet. The first general response in developed countries to this is to feel pity for them and great sadness. And some people in developed countries sometimes say, “We have a responsibility to help suffering people in undeveloped countries. Let’s give the money to charity for poor people in undeveloped countries!!” However, do people in developed countries really have a responsibility to help people in undeveloped countries? Why would we have a responsibility to help people in undeveloped countries? This essay will argue that people in wealthy, developed countries do not have a responsibility to help very poor people in undeveloped countries. First, we have a bigger responsibility to people close to us. Second, we should not interfere with people in undeveloped countries.
Support Paragraph #1 One of the main reasons why we do not have a responsibility to help is that our most important responsibility is to the people we know and love. This is because we regard a special relationship as very important. This idea is supported by Fraser (2007), who also believes her only responsibility is to herself, her families and her friends. She gives an example which is, if two children are drowning and one of two children is our son and the other is a stranger’s son, most of us would try to save our son because he is a special for us. If we save a stranger, we may not save our son. So, if we have responsibility to help poor strangers who live in undeveloped counties, we will not be able to help the people who we know and love. In sum, we should put the people who close to us before the strangers.
Support Paragraph #2 Another reason why we do not have a responsibility to help is that developed countries should not help poor people in undeveloped countries without thought. This is because our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 article Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he describes the dire situation that nine million refugees faced in East Bengal in 1971 and urges the wealthier, or affluent, nations to take immediate and long term moral actions to stop the spread of extreme global poverty. With this, he offers a philosophical approach to a new world where, instead of giving to charity, everyone living in these affluent nations ought to make it their duty to give anything of excess to those suffering across the globe and live at the marginal utility, which he would prefer. He also offers a less drastic option of moderate assistance wherein those who are able to assist ought to, as long as it does not create a similar moral dilemma. Critics argue that rewriting the moral scheme from charity to a concrete duty would be far too drastic and would unfairly condemn those who choose to “live the good life”; that too much effort would cause us to become less effective; and finally, that if everyone were in similar positions, then an equal amount would be given by all, but the result would actually be less than if some gave everything they had while others gave nothing.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Those living in first world countries should have as much interest as those living in third world countries, as they do in their own society. To be indifferent to others suffering is to be inhuman. In a global society, we are all connected to each and it is our duty to accept this true it we want to live ethically. Living the Gospel/Action Sobrino argues that there is a flaw in our reality. Human’s greatest enemy is material items.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” author, Peter Singer, exercises his theory about everyone’s moral obligation to help world hunger. Every day people make choices, whether it be what pants to wear, what food items to buy at the store, or whether or not you donate money to those suffering. Across the world there are avoidable sufferings according to Singer as long as people do their part; “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, we ought to morally do it” (889).…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue of moral obligations towards the global poor has always been a contentious affair to be discussed for fear of problematic resolutions that may affect academia on a personal level. Peter Singer, most notable for his authorship of “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and the drowning child analogy, presents the rather uncommon normative view that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate more resources to humanitarian causes than the present standard. Singer’s perspective on these seemingly radical moral ideals are confronted by many a pragmatic objection, ranging from entitlement principles to moral inequalities. Nevertheless, Singer builds his argumentative framework in regards to moral obligations to the global poor on solid…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” he argues that when people abroad are suffering or dying from lack of food, shelter or medicine, it is wrong for people here to spend money on morally unimportant things rather than giving money to help (Hughes). This means that we have a moral obligation to do what we can to alleviate the stress of poverty abroad if it does not do any harm to us helping them. If we are able to benefit people abroad, we should do so. Food, shelter, and quality healthcare are things that should be seen as basic necessities; therefore, not only do we have a moral obligation to help those abroad in need, but we should also have the want to help those in need. Although Singer asserts this claim, he does identify…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Is Wrong

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It also doesn’t suggest that we are morally permitted not to contribute to famine relief and similar causes, rather I think we are morally permitted, to some extent, to choose what we do with our lives insofar as it is required for us to be free to pursue the interests that we know would yield some socially beneficial outcomes.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer's position on our moral obligation to aid the world's poor is characteristically frank and rests on three premises. The first premise states that ‘if we can prevent something bad without sacrificing something significant, we ought to do it.’ The second premise simply declares that ‘extreme poverty is bad’. Finally, the third premise claims that ‘there is some extreme poverty we can prevent without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance.’ Ultimately, the sum of the premises’ yield the conclusion that ‘we ought to prevent some extreme poverty.’ The premises are wisely formulated; it’s put forth in a fashion that…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Car Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," by Peter Singer, he is addressing the subject of charity, morality in general, and giving us a different insight in the thoughts about famine relief. Singer points out some interesting things in his article. I do agree that people, espeically the rich, should do more than what most of them actually do. This paper will explain Singer 's goal, his counter arguments, his concept of marginal utility, and the ideas of charity and duty.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Based on the article by Peter Singer entitled Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he attempts to move us to do more for charities and gives one astounding example. He uses starving children in Bengali and a drowning child.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe, in drastic cases that can’t and shouldn’t be ignored, we can intervene and try to help out in anyway. There are many reasons as to why this philosophy is good to try. Somethings are small and domestic, where it’s only a problem in that country and the country can and needs to handle it on their own. Then, there are some things that are on a larger scale that need to be looked at with more than one vision.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reconsider Lifeboat Ethics

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In his article “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor,” Garret Hardin argues that rich nations should not help poor nations by providing limited resources. He presents that the rich nations are morally obligated to protect their limited because sharing will only lead to catastrophe, squander and overloading the environment. He claims that poor nations should learn from the “hard way” independently and control the population by the crude way if they want to manage their poverty. Hardin, on the other hand, doesn’t completely negate that rich nations shouldn’t help poor nations, but they should provide technical support instead of material support. His arguments include the limited natural resources, tragedy of commons, no true world government to control reproduction and the use of available resources. We should take actions according to the ethics of lifeboat.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Audience “Need to know” Statement: We should help the poor because they are fellow human beings. We cannot turn a blind-eye. We are all interdependent.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Poverty is an increasing problem in our world today. A report by the National Welfare found that 17.2 percent of Canadians live below the poverty line in 1998. It is however, measured differently in developing and developed countries. People who struggle financially in countries like Canada or even the United States, when compared to people living in third world countries are considered above the poverty line. Income at developing countries falls at less than one dollar per person a day, which led to an estimation that 1.3 billion people lived below the poverty line. Even so, third world countries may not have the same opportunities and probabilities first world country get. Say, the homeless and illiterate ones in developing countries who…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays