Preview

Detecting Media Bias

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1927 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Detecting Media Bias
Detecting Media Bias
Annie Askew
HUM/111 Critical and Creative Thinking July 8, 2012 Christopher Boyer

Introduction: Chief Justice John Roberts stated that is was a tax, however, the debate continues on how to clarify The “Affordable Care Act”. The debate as well as the country is divided on how the law will proceed, and the language used to define it, will shape the 2012 Presidential election.

Body1: On June 28, 2012 The Supreme Court voted 5-4 to uphold The Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obama Care”. The decision stated that as long as the individual mandate is a tax, then congress has the power and authority to levy it. The word “tax” or the word “penalty” may seem like semantics in the large scheme of things; however these two words are at the very core of the debate. A tax, for the most part is a sum of money demanded by the government for its support, or for specific facilities or services. A tax is not voluntary; it is levied upon incomes, property, sales etc. A penalty is a punishment established by law or authority for such things as crime, offenses, or failure to do something. The Four Supreme Court Justices that hold the dissent feel that the government imposing a penalty on American citizens who chooses not to purchase health insurance is unconstitutional. The four justices that were in favor of “Obama care” believe that the government has the power to impose a penalty on those who do not purchase health insurance. The deciding vote came down to Chief Justice John Roberts. The interesting part of his decision is that he agrees with the dissent, that the government does not have the power to impose a penalty; however they do have the power to levy taxes.
Body2:
Roberts’s decision goes directly to the heart of the controversy, because for two years the Obama administration clearly stated that this



References: “Individual Mandate a Tax or A Penalty” Eric Erickson Brian Darling Red state 7/4/12 Is It A Tax or A Penalty? Calvin Woodard Associated Press 7/3/12

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The “Affordable Care Act of 2010” also known as “Obamacare” or “Health Care Reform Act of 2010” is a universal healthcare plan that was designed to allow Americans to be able to get quality health insurance that people would be able to afford, and to cut U.S health care spending down as well. Many Americans debated about whether or not it was beneficial for everyone or just certain people, so there are many advantage and disadvantages for Americas due to this reform.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The importance of making critical evaluations of news stories come to play in the recent story about the Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case. This was a story about a young black teenager and a neighborhood watchman that shot and killed Trayvon Martin in Sanford Florida. Many news stations reported the story through the country and the trial was on CNN every day until a verdict came into place. During the trial the prosecutors showed pictures which were the ones that came from the scene that was taken prior after the crime had happened. Trayvon’s pictures showed him as an innocent boy and Zimmerman as upset and angry with a mug shot. The media also showed bias to both these individuals and seemed to be concerned with sensationalism, rather than finding out the true facts.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our team’s debate topic covers a controversial issue within the Affordable Care Act in America, known as Obamacare. Obamacare is the universal health care in the United States that provides Americans access to affordable, quality health insurance, with a goal of reducing growth in healthcare spending. This universal health plan is technically a mandate or tax, in which non-compliers may be penalized through their federal return. Our topic debates whether Americans should be forced to pay this ‘shared responsibility fee’ for not complying with Obamacare.…

    • 2148 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled on June 28, 2012 that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 also known as the ObamaCare Act is to be upheld, even the controversial parts, where people without health insurance will have to pay a fine starting in 2014. The ObamaCare Act was started to “help reduce overall health care costs by making services available to 32 million who currently cannot get health insurance”(useconomy.about.com, part of the New York Times Company Amadeo, 2012). The Act will make it so insurance companies cannot disqualify a person from receiving health insurance because of a pre-existing condition, and will also make sure that insurance companies do not drop someone because they are sick. Large companies with more than 50 employees will have to offer health insurance, but they will receive tax credits. “The Act will lower the budget deficit by $143 billion over the next ten year by raising some taxes and shifting more cost burdens”( Source: CBO CBO Report on Health Care Reform and the Budget; Wall Street Journal, What Health Insurance Ruling Means, June 28, 2012; NPR, Medicaid Expansion, June 27, 2012, useconomy.about.com, part of the New York Times Company Amadeo, 2012). Starting on January 1 2014 everyone in the United States is supposed to have health insurance. The hope is that if everyone has health insurance, the healthy people are going to equal out the unhealthy people and so insurance should not be too high of cost, or too expensive, but people are afraid that is not what is going to happen. If a person does not qualify for Medicaid or does not purchase health insurance by January 1, 2014 they will have to pay $95 (or 1% of their income whichever is higher), in 2015 people without insurance will have to pay a penalty of $325 (or 2% of income) and in 2016 they will pay $695 (or 2.5% of income). About 4 million people will end up paying the penalty instead of purchasing health…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taxes are going up as another result of this health care act. “The taxes that may affect you directly are the individual mandate and the employer mandate.” (Obamacarefacts.com 2016) There were several new taxes that were made to help pay for Obamacare including taxes on pharmaceutical sales and medical device. People with high income also got an additional tax put on them. Some other cons of Obamacare include enrolling complications, businesses cutting employees hours to avoid having to give them coverage, and higher costs. Some people have gotten stuck paying more for Obamacare than they did under their previous health care plans. “ A heavily cited (and debated) 2013 Associated Press report estimated that the health insurance policies of 4.7 million Americans were canceled due to noncompliance with Obamacare standards going into the inaugural year.” (Elizabeth Renter 2014). Many opponents of Obamacare believe that legislation will demolish jobs, hours are being cut and full-time employees are becoming slim. About 1.2% of the population will mainly be paying the tax rather than the health insurance they should be paying for because the taxes are getting so…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Campaign Finance Reform

    • 3014 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Gitelson, A., Dudley, R., and Dubnick, M. (2004), American Government (7th Ed) Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company…

    • 3014 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. Appeals Court in Atlanta has already deemed the passing of this act as unconstitutional (Brent, 2011). It is a contested issue on which the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in the coming weeks. Another appeals court in Virginia has stated that legally, this matter should be revisited when taxpayers are made to pay penalties, in the next three years (Savage, 2011). This brings into question the constitutionality of this act and the fact remains that there is far from universal agreement over this. An important argument raised by opponents is that the passing of this law would open way for unrestricted powers to the Federal government. It is argued that this mandate would be structured like a tax, hence making it legitimate for the Federal government to impose on us. Furthermore, that health insurance is a type of interstate commerce, is another argument cited by the law’s proponents ("Obamacare" 2010). However, this would set a landmark precedent which may become a threat to the liberties we cherish in this nation.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The new Healthcare law is unfair to the community because it increases taxes, and enforces the employer's mandate. As an example of unfair taxes “The stock market has grown seven times faster than America's GDP since 1981, and two-thirds of the country's stocks are owned by the wealthiest one percent of Americans”(common dreams). Fundamentally the wealthy own the majority of the country's stock, and with ACA passed stock market profits are being taxed up to fifteen percent more than before. The prosperous should not be taxed just because they have sufficient money, it is money that they earned. As a second example “The employer's mandate discourages smaller businesses from hiring more employees because businesses without fifty or more full-time employees (FTEs) may be penalized for not offering medical coverage” (U.S). This is negative for a company because, though they already pay their employees a substantial amount of money, they lose money by paying extra. The ACA ruling is vexatious for people because it increases…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On June 28, 2012, The Supreme Court ruled the Federal Government does not have the constitutional right to sanction an individual to buy health insurance, but declared that the states do have the right to place a tax on citizens that do not carry insurance. This ruling is in response to President Obama’s Patient Protection and Healthcare Act of 2010. Passed on March 23, 2010, President Obama’s Reform Act mandates Texas, as well as the nation, to provide Medicaid funding to all individuals that are uninsured by 2014. As well as expanding Medicaid, it will provide exchanges, which are pools of insurance companies a previously uninsured person can pick from. The government will subsidize this expansion program by paying 100 percent of the cost of newly-eligible adults up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level. In 2017, the matching rate will be 95 percent; in 2018, it will be 94 percent; in 2019, it will be 93 percent; and in 2020 and future years, it will be 90 percent (The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2010). The United States Supreme Court did add an addendum to its ruling; in the case of, National Federation of Independent Business Et Al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Et Al, the states can opt out of providing Medicaid expansion without being threatened of the loss of matching Medicaid dollars. Also, if a state chooses not to provide exchanges to its constituents, it falls back on the federal government to provide a system (National Federation of Independent Business Et Al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Servies, Et Al., 2011). Rick Perry, Governor from the state of Texas, declared his opposition to this viewpoint in a letter to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius:…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Obamacare. Opposing Views

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Affordable Care Act is a statute signed into a law by Barack Obama on March, 23 2010. This act which is also known as Obamacare is a part of a health care reform which among other things will change and regulate requirements for employers’ group insurance plans as well as private health plans and public health programs.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Affordable Care Act

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Kaufman, N. (Jan, 2011). Changing economics in an era of healthcare reform. Retrieved from http://www.biomedsearch.com/article/Changing-economics-in-era-healthcare/271594399.html…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Health Care Reform

    • 3505 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The Health Care Reform is making a huge economic impact as it has very important insinuations when it comes to the US economy. Hence it is important to understand what is going on with this topic. In “Health care reform stands: How it impacts your coverage” by Parija Kavilanz, it states that the Supreme Court supported the health care reform meaning that it is obligatory for people to purchase coverage by 2014 and if not they will have to be fined. Hence by 2014, this will affect uninsured persons because they will have to purchase coverage by either doing it personally, by their employer's offered health plans or by a health insurance exchange. If they decide not to purchase coverage then a tax penalty would apply, for example when 2014 arrives, if an individual has not purchased coverage than the penalty fee will be $285 per family or 1% of their revenue (they will have to pay the higher one). By 2016, the penalty fee will increase drastically to $2,085 per family or 2.5% of their revenue, paying the higher one. In the intervening time, the people that are insured will still benefit from the significant things that are offered by the law. This includes things such as full coverage for preventive care and for grownup dependents of up to 26 year of age. However, this is possible because of the personal greater expenditure.…

    • 3505 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health Insurance Exchange

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Bergner, A., & Thompson, M. (2013). The New Economics of Health Care Benefits. Financial Executive, 29(2), 29-32.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, it can be viewed as encroaching on citizens’ rights to self-determination, since the law requires everyone to buy health care, if they want to or not. A quote from Anthony Vecchione’s article Debating the Ethical Implications of the Affordable Care Act, can further explain this accusation when it says, “Some critics of the ACA argue that the controversial individual mandate -- which requires American who meet certain criteria to purchase health insurance -- is unethical.” This goes to show that the particular problem people tend to have with the ACA is that citizens are forced to pay for certain resources, that one might view as unnecessary. Nonetheless, Dr. Sorrell sums up the ethics of the Affordable Care Act, and shows how now through this act disabled people can benefit from…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress looked into this act to find out whether or not it was unconstitutional so they came out with a way to make it more constitutional. Congress found the mandate to “purchase” this health insurance from these private companies “is commercial and economic in nature, and substantially affects interstate commerce.” Congress also chose not to refer to the penalty one would get if not attaining health care and keeping it as a “tax” but as a “penalty”. Congress said that this couldn’t be referred to as a “tax” because it didn’t allow the use of traditional tax enforcement to collect the penalty.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays