Preview

Descartes 'Argument Imagination'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes 'Argument Imagination'
The quality of the wax can be noticed through Descartes mention of “flexibility” and “changeability”. This is caused through the change of its shape from round to square, square to triangular, and so on, As Descartes mentions. But the imagination does not give wax it’s flexibility to change qualities, but rather a physical effect that modifies the wax’s quality such as melting or freezing. Because of these modifications, our minds are now able to perceive the quality of the wax differently than its previous form. Quality relates to Descartes conclusion because it is a component that contributes to perception of our minds and awareness to the world around us. Imagination plays a significant role in wax’s perception to human eyes. Descartes believes that if we witness the wax, leave the area, and then return to the wax over time, it will be perceived/classified as a different wax that is not the same to the previous wax you witnessed before. The most significant relationship between imagination and Descartes conclusion is that without imagination, perception of objects like wax would not be distinguishable resulting in all objects being identical to each other. Sensations such as sight, smell, touch, …show more content…
This is because I believe that our perception, sense, and quality of an object can change at any moment in time. Since all objects are also capable to being “flexible” or “changeable”, through these occurrences, all objects are subjective to change whether it is minor or major. Therefore, all objects such as the wax can be perceived as differentiating individual items through Descartes argument. I also agree with Descartes argument because when you take a scientific perspective to Descartes premises, they are all true. For example, when Descartes discusses the premise of imagination, all our imaginative thoughts can be controlled through the brain and its capability to expand thoughts rather than generalizing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    His latest, traditional compositions of floral imagery applied the use of computerised machine embroidery, acrylic paint, wood, glass and collage, he studied the use of illusion of dimensions, using about two or three to create colourful, metrical, algebraic and holographic sensations, with the precise detail that morphs into optical illusions. Brennand-Wood’s sculptures are very abstract, and he tends to play with colour and rhythm that’s seems also hallucinogenic, that the pattern creates another appearance, “ stepping into another world’ as Michael quoted. However the meaning of the piece, is that it’s not just a magical piece of delusion it is something you think about and reflect upon. He is a renowned for his innovative and original ideas, and is one of the most inspiring and creative artists that works in textiles. He believes that his art offers traditionality, mixed ethnic influences, non mainstream work, and that the most inventive contemporary textiles derive from a certain understanding of both textiles and their history. What makes Michael Brennand-Woods masterpieces so intriguing is that the eccentric bright colours and patterns hold a much more philosophical and deeper meaning, pattern is important as they convey emotions and identity as it is an encoded visual language. When he creates his sculptures he always keeps in mind the sense of touch, as he like to convey the…

    • 2344 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes discovered his first indubitable truth is that he, himself, did exist. He used his methods of doubt to discount anything he thought he knew previously. He doubted everything his senses had told him because, according to Descartes, what he may have seen or heard might not necessarily be real. He also was not convinced that what he did in his waking life could have been while he was dreaming and, therefore, might also be false. By discarding everything based on the senses, mental imagery and by questioning the existence of God, he was able to start with a blank slate on which to prove his idea. His method of inquiry was knowledge based on certainty. Once he was satisfied that it was certain beyond any doubt, he came to his first indubitable truth, that he existed.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes' dream argument comes off to me is that we cannot fully trust our senses especially with the difference of dreaming and being awake. Descartes did state that he could be dreaming things since he was fooled into believing he was awake in the past. This argument goes on to say that their isn't an actual way to tell if you are dreaming or if you're awake. Since from Descrates' point of view we are not sure what is real and what is an actual dream in that our senses can be easily fooled into believing whatever the mind wants us to believe.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stuart, M., (1999). Descartes Extended Substance. New Essay on the Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PHI Chapter 2

    • 1482 Words
    • 5 Pages

    - The philosophical problem of explaining how it is possible to know that there are other minds in the world.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although he does not direct the argument considered in this paper against any one philosopher or school of thought, in the Principles of Philosophy he presents his understanding of substance as antithetical to that of the Scholastics, who believed that substance applied univocally to God and creatures. As his understanding of substance is essential to this argument, the difference is reflected throughout it as well. While for Scholastic thinkers the human being was essentially a hylomorphic substance, Descartes posits that the mind and body thought to make up a human being are in fact distinct substances, and the human essence is tied more closely with the mind…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later in his second meditation, as Descartes begins to doubt his own conclusion that he exists as a thinking thing, he goes into an elaborate analogy known as his "wax passage". Comparing the wax to his knowledge of himself, he begins by discussing the physical characteristics which can be known by means of the senses. However, the importance lies in the fact that by heating, the wax can be altered and the sensible properties are no longer the same. He then goes on to explain that even though this occurs, he is still able to mentally grasp the existence of the wax even with new properties. In realizing this, Descartes struggles with how it is he can grasp the wax without relying its sensible characteristics. He decides then that he is actually experiencing a manifestation of an idea that only his mind can perceive, instead of what he senses. He realizes the importance of the fact that something can be perceived…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are always two sides of the same coin, and the coin is the subject of existence. To go against Unger’s, I Do Not Exist, I will use Descartes view of dualism and the fact that, according to him, humans do exist. Yes, there are other views of existence that could go against both of these philosophical views, but Unger and Descartes really counterbalance each other. As mentioned before, Unger explains he doesn’t exist due to anything which exists having a finite amount of small parts. If these parts were continually taken away, one could exist until at one point it would not, due to losing all their parts. In respect to Unger, his argument is correct when dealing with objects such as “tables or chairs, rocks or stones or ordinary stars,”…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Cezanne

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cézanne strived to add form to Impressionism therefore he strayed from his peers, whom he believed lacked composition in their works. He did not have the same attraction towards light as did many Impressionist, he believed that the structure of objects should be portrayed through colour, not light, "I seek to render perspective only through colour". Cézanne created the illusion of depth in his works by adding numerous layers of colour to distinguish the form of his subjects. He would perfect the design in his works by distorting objects and having multiple…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cézanne’s painting has no illusion of reality due to the easily detected brushwork, little sense of depth, and delineation of form. There is almost no three-dimensionality, an element crucial to the creation of illusion, whereas in Vecchio’s there are several elements that create an idea of reality, an idea that the scene before us is indeed happening: the strong light sources that apparently model the figures and other objects, the traceable vanishing point, which is almost impossible to detect in Cézanne’s Bathers, and the significant contrast between the darker and lighter areas. The density of the brushstrokes and the absence of details in Cézanne’s painting break the illusion of the visual effect created by the harmony of colours, whereas in the Bathing Nymphs there is no apparent trace of the brushwork.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of the elements work to together to enhance Michelangelo’s artwork. When looking at the painting the eye is immediately drawn to the fingers almost touching were the breath of life is transmitted. Having a small gap in-between the fingers leaves tension. The lines leading up to the focal point are actual organic lines and organic shapes that are rounded and flowing. Through the body of God and Adam you can really depict the movement occurring. The colours used make the painting more neutral and more calm and relaxed. The stimulated texture found in this painting makes the bodies look lifelike. The space is not very deep.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Red Wheelbarrow

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alternately, you can say that it's not the objects themselves that matter, but the image that they create. It's the redness of the wheelbarrow and the whiteness of the chickens that matters, and the pleasing contrast those colors make when found next to each other. The line "glazed with rain water" appears to support this interpretation, with its suggestion of a painter or a potter's decorative glaze.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Art objects that instead of hiding behind a fancy exterior cover a work that reveals their selves. It opens its self up to be critiqued, to be ridiculed, and looked at. This honesty in what it is, and what it is not, can be a powerful tool for an artist. For example, the painting The Treachery of Images by René Magritte, shows a brown pipe and the text below it reads “Ceci n’est une pipe” or “ This is Not a Pipe”. This painting is so honest in what it is it is hard at first to not take it as some kind of joke. This painting is obviously a painting of a pipe, so why in the world does it say, “ This is not a pipe”? This work is confusing until one relies this is not a pipe this is a painting of a pipe. It is an illusion, a symbol to represent a real object. This painting is a great example of a work of art truthful. Instead of trying to fool the viewer in to an illusion, a young artist should use this to there advantage. the young artist should make the audience an active part of the art and not just try to trick them in to believing you. It is always better to have the viewer be in on the magic or idea so thy can believe to for themselves instead of relying on the artist to tell them what to see or do. The goal of a young artist should not be to fool the viewers but to make the viewers question…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fifth meditation starts off by Descartes straying away from meditating on the aspects of himself and God and compelling himself to focus on what he was pondering on a few days ago: material things. But before Descartes tries to reason if material things outside himself exist, he must first make sure material things can be definite outside his thoughts without being subjected to doubtfulness. Other than that, anything outside these parameters has to be omitted and seen as distractions from what he is trying to ponder on. He has to understand the difference between the material things that are definite and the material things that are ambiguous or bring about doubt and being deceived through the senses. Descartes first has to audit his…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays