Preview

Death penalty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1507 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death penalty
Nora
Death penalty should be abolished because it is against the bill of right. The eighth amendment of the constitution stated that it is unconstitutional to apply usual punishment to anyone. Although some people think that death penalty helps to decrease the number of crime, it was found that death penalty doesn't affect the number of crimes in the society.[6] Some believes that death penalty helps the government to cut the spending in prison, but what can cost more than human’s life. There are cases that show that it is possible that the person who is in the death row is innocent, and some might even have mental illnesses. Death penalty violates human rights and should be abolished due to many reasons, such as different methods of execution.
There are many ways of execution and all methods are cruel and usual, which violates human rights. Methods of execution include lethal injection, electrocution, gas chamber, firing squad, and hanging, and they all can cause extreme pain to the prisoner. [3] Lethal injection is the most common way for execution in the United States today in death penalty state. Prisoners who are put in death row are injected with three types of medicine, Pentothal, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride, during lethal injection. Although this kind of execution method doesn’t seem painful, research shows four out of ten of inmate experience extreme pain. Other methods of execution are also cruel, and some causes the prisoner’s eyeball pops out, or blood releasing from body before they die, like a reporter described “Before he was pronounced dead, blood from his nose poured onto the collar of his white shirt, and blood spread across his chest.” [5] Furthermore, the eighth amendment stated that there shouldn’t be anyone who should be punished in an unusual and cruel way and research shows that methods of death penalty cause pain. Death penalty is cruel, unusual, and can also be unfair to prisoners.
Death penalty is unfair because there

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is outdated, irreversible, hypocritical, and ineffective and deterring criminals, and should therefore be abolished. There are many things wrong with executing criminals, but some of the most compelling reasons are these: it is barbaric, does not positively affect murder rates, and to put it simply, two wrongs do not make a right.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    death penalty

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specific deterrence- punishment of a crime that prevents the offender from repeating the same offense again.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In his paper, “The Minimal Invasion Argument Against the Death Penalty”, Hugo Adam Bedau argues against the death penalty. Bedau’s purpose is to convince people to favor the lifetime imprisonment over the death penalty with an argument that had been previously used by other authors called “The minimal Invasion Argument”, which he considers to be “the best argument against the death penalty”(Bedau, 4). In this paper I will describe Bedau’s argument and show how he has some weaknesses addressing the concept of the minimal invasion argument by ignoring what in my opinion is the main reason why the death penalty has not been abolished; this reason being our incapacity as humans to “define” our environment. When we call one thing by a name we believe this thing is the name by which we have called it. For example when we call somebody a criminal we take away many of the characteristics that make us equal to the criminal and then just call him or her a criminal. With this essay I want to prove that in some cases as human beings we need to believe in re-definition, in change; all this in order to build a better society. To do this I will first explain Bedau’s argument as best as possible and then conclude with the issues I found on it that are based on our language as the interpreter of our world.…

    • 2559 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Title: Point: Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished. By: Ballaro, Beverly, Cushman, C. Ames, Points of View: Death Penalty, 2009 Database: Points of View Reference Center…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After analyzing Ernest Van Den Haag’s case study ‘In Defense of the Death Penalty’, and Hugo A. Bedau’s ‘The Case Against the Death Penalty’, I have conflicting feelings contradict my own analysis. Ernest Van Den Haag breaks down the pros and cons of the death penalty and uses retributivism to justify death penalty and capital punishment, while Hugo A. Bedau’s article is about the inconsistency in capital punishment and in particular on the abolition of practice. Each article states key positions that make my feelings conflicted between both sides, Bedau backs up that the majority of people persecuted fight through several trails after a long period incarcerated with life sentenced to death end up guilty. (Bedau, 243) Van Den Haag key positions reflect in the retributivist statement, “eye for an eye”. (Van Den Haag, 231) I believe in both sides, and in my own opinion there is no solution for middle ground.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The mother of a teenager killed during a shooting rampage at a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant in Aurora in 1993 is begging the governor to let convicted killer Nathan Dunlap die. "Sit back, make no decision, allow the one that 12 people made after listening to all the evidence 17 years ago stand," said Sandi Rogers in a statement sent to Gov. John Hickenlooper. Sandi 's son, Ben Grant, was 17 years old when he was shot and killed with his co-workers. Dunlap had been fired from the restaurant before he came back and shot five people at closing time. Four died, one survived. Ben had only worked at the restaurant for three weeks before the shooting. Sandi said Ben didn 't even know Dunlap. "He 'd never met the guy, he 'd never even seen the guy before," Sandi said back in 1993. Ben 's family and friends said he was a bright, strong, funny young man. "He never got to get married, and have children, he never got to see the world," Sandi said. The sole survivor of a mass shooting in 1993 is tired of talking about the man who changed his life forever. “Every time I have to speak on this, it re-opens wounds,” said Bobby Stephens. Stephens was 20 at the time of the shooting. He was picking up some extra hours at the Chuck E. Cheese restaurant where he worked when gunman Nathan Dunlap came in to rob the store. Dunlap shot and killed Sylvia Crowell, 19; Ben Grant, 17; Colleen O’Connor, 17; and Margaret Kohlberg, 50. Dunlap also shot Bobby Stephens in the face, but didn’t kill him. Stephens lay wounded and bleeding until the robbery was over. Dunlap was convicted and sentenced to death for his crimes. Now, 20 years later, Dunlap learned he will live at least a while longer. Gov. John Hickenlooper announced on May 22, 2013 he’s granting a temporary reprieve of Dunlap’s execution. Capital punishment, also dubbed the “death penalty” is the premeditated and planned taking of a human life by a government in a response to a crime committed by that legally…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. What amendment to the U.S. Constitution gave women the right to vote, and in what year?…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what life would be like knowing that a murderer went free after killing one of your family members; it is a very unsettling thought knowing that people have this feeling everyday. The death penalty is the best punishment for murderers because it is condoned by the Bible, gives closure to family members and keeps the cost of inmates down.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States is inflicted upon criminals by the state as punishment for an offence. This method of punishment dates back to the beginning of recorded history. Various primitive tribal histories indicate that the death penalty was a part of many ancient justice systems (Wikipedia). Nowadays, it is primarily used in cases where someone commits murder. Some people think that capital punishment deters crime and prevents convicted criminals from committing greater offences, but this idea is false. It has been debated for a long time because it is a poor way of punishing murderers. Execution in the United States violates human rights and is not the most effective way to inflict justice. Examination proves this point. The death penalty clearly violates human rights, is not an effective means of preventing other crimes and is very expensive.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “Forgiving violence does not mean condoning violence. There are only two alternatives to forgiving violence: revenge, or adopting an attitude of never-ending bitterness and anger. For too long we have treated violence with violence, and that's why it never ends.” (Coretta Scott King, Widow of Martin Luther King) Capital Punishment should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. The Catholic Church is adamantly opposed to the death penalty. The death penalty should be banned as long as there are non-lethal means to defend and protect the people’s safety.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roy Brown is a conservative who believes in individual rights and the right to life. He believes there is no deeper violation of a citizen’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness than the government killing them when they’re actually innocent. With the use of the death penalty, mistakes are highly inescapable (Brown 1).…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several methods used to carry out the executions ranging from stoning, beheading, and executing by rope, lethal injection, electrocuting, shooting and all you can think of. However, executions, regardless of the method used, are cruel and inhumane.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 2380 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In the hit show Prison Break, Lincoln Burrows is put on death row for a murder he did not commit. Each week we saw firsthand, his frustration and the desperation of the situation he was in. This television show is a reality for the many innocent people that have been put on death row. Since 1993 there have been 138 defendants exonerated from their death sentence. The number of innocent people put to death is probably higher. Supporters of the death penalty say that the benefits of the death penalty outweigh the risk of executing innocent people. This is not true because the risks are too high, and the benefits too small. This high risk of mistakes occurring can be attributed to police errors, and problems with the judicial system. For these reasons, the death penalty should be abolished.…

    • 2380 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty has been most talked about for years, to some it is an unfair way to pass judgment on a person. The argument went as far as to say that conforming to such a method is a step backwards and offers no real solution. Critic Coretta Scott King argued strongly against the practice and rebukes the idea. One can always say what they want about the matter but insufficient knowledge with hinder their judgment. The death penalty ought to be considered as a means of punishment for those who commit ghastly murders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays