David Hume's Dichotomy

David Hume gave a famous interpretation of the fact-value distinction in his Treatise: you can’t derive an “ought” from an “is”. No set of statements of facts by themselves entails any statement of value. In other words, no set of descriptive statements can entail an evaluative statement without the addition of at least one evaluative or normative premise.1
But the philosophical position that facts and values are two different things has been challenged by several critics that consider it deluded. I will only consider two pf those criticisms to this dichotomy.
Firstly, Hilary Putnam's critic who, in a seminal essay, argued that the distinction between fact and value is not as absolute as Hume envisioned. For him facts and values are entangled