Preview

David Hume

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1429 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume
One of the most important and influential skeptics and empiricists of his time was David Hume. His thinking lead him to be one of the greatest philosophers that we will ever read about. David Hume and John Locke as philosophers, both believed in naturalism and having proof and evidence to verify reasoning in existence. It was Hume that exclaimed the sources for cause and effect. He said that cause and effect are essential in reasoning, (the things we think of mentally) and that we must find an association in things and how they relate to one another, because everything has a purpose (94). In modern times, it is still not enough to have experiences to gather information to know something to be true, just and correct; we have to seek an understanding …show more content…
He was quick to point out that Cleanthes arguments cannot be condensed and belittled down into one experience. Philo decreed that we all have experience with nature and how we know things are similar and how every action has an equal or opposite reaction such fire is hot and it will burn; this is also another one of doctrines he used which is cause and effect, (94). An example he uses is if we see a house we are to conclude that there must have been an architect to design and build such a structure. The earth too is a grand structure but with how much certainty can we say that the earth is also a design of …show more content…
I now can understand that truth seeking would have been a break from the normal traditions of religious following or a break from which it would have been the cultural norm to have a belief in some Deity(s).
In my opinion it is not that those whom believe in religion are less thought provoking or less intelligent, although there is current data and meta-analysis that has found some correlation of a lower I.Q. of religious believers than those who are atheists; however in during Hume’s era it seems it was such a daunting task to ask for evidence in reasoning, not only in believing in a Deity but any knowledge someone said they acquired about a subject, and upon asking their response would be, I know what I know because I experienced this or that.
Today, we absolutely must use research to find the cause of an experience, in order to know what effect, it will have on a person or object, modern technology helps us do this. The creation of social sciences tells us that this is true. Anthropology, Sociology, Psychology all use data collection and statistics (mathematical calculations) to study human interactions culturally, personally and individually. Through these sciences, we can answer theories and questions to better help society function. It is only through philosophy that we can even ask such questions and think of any sort of theory regarding human existence

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    If death is the perpetual and permanent end of our existence, the question comes up, if suicide is morally right or wrong. Should death even be feared? Suicide rates are increasing, in fact, 2015; there was a suicide rate of 11.4 per 100,000 people, or in perspective, 800,000 in the world. My standpoint on suicide is that it is morally acceptable to do it under any circumstances.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ps300 Unit 2 Project

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Research is designed to provide explanations and prove theories, researcher go beyond normal everyday observation and assumption and through various research methods used through systematic and controlled observation show empirical evidence that those observation are valid and prove their hypothesis. There are four different types of research methods that psychology uses to prove the hypothesis and when the researcher begins to prove a theory they must decide on the proper research method to follow to prove that theory.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume's changed the idea of skepticism in a very different way. While Descartes used doubt and skepticism as a way to find out the foundations and roots of knowledge,Hume used sleo contrast with what we saw as the ordinary claims of knowledge. Hume explains two types of skepticism: antecedent and consequent. Both of these come in a very moderate and extreme form. He explains antecedent skepticism by using the Descartes theory of universal doubt. He explains that there is no principle that is more self evident than doubt and even if there was we would not be able to advance ahead of it because we our still able to doubt and reason deductively. This would mean Antecedent skepticism is incurable.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume’s version of empiricism begins with his distinction between analytic propositions “relationship of ideas,” which he considers to be a priori and true by definition, and synthetic propositions, which he considers to be a posteriori (“matters of fact”), and which are opposite of analytic propositions because they’re derived from our senses.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The view of interest here holds to the objection that personal identity is anything but ubiquitous, but rather the set of characteristics in question form a personality, which a person merely possesses as a holding, a constitutive of personal consciousness. On this view, a person can change their personality without having their identity annihilated in the strict sense implied by Hume, because one’s personality as well as the personality traits is constitutive of personal identity. Based on how this idea has been refined in recent paragraphs, I propose we rename it personality as a constitutive of personal identity or personality as a constitutive for short. The basis for personality as a constitutive has been that personal identity as a static…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument from design is an analogy and works by comparing the universe to an object. An example of the comparison would be to say the world resembles a car. All cars have creators, therefore, the world has to have a creator, and that must be God. The argument concludes by saying by observing the world we can gather evidence that the intelligence of a human that creates a car, bike or some other item resembles, in a less perfect form, God. However, Hume thinks this argument fails.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most recognized critiques of Aquinas is David Hume, who addressed the argument from design in his work Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Hume began by summarizing Aquinas' logic, and the many alterations that followed. Essentially, Hume argued that attributing design in the natural universe to an intelligent creator is flawed in two ways. First, he uses to analogy of a house to discredit Aquinas' inferences.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people use religion for this purpose. When trying to find answers to life's mysteries, religious impulse begins. When the mystery is understood, you come to understand the religious life as more as a quest than a destination.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that David Hume’s criticisms against the cosmological argument are insufficient. Hume’s argument is based around two main points, the idea that explaining the parts of the universe is sufficient instead of an explanation of the universe as a whole and that the causal principle is questionable.…

    • 437 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume on Personal Identity

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hume 's view of what constitutes personal identity rests heavily upon his preceding theories concerning the nature of ideas and causation. The most important preceding ideas to take into account are the rejection of causality and necessary connection and his strict empiric stance on the basis of knowledge and the only two types of perception being ideas that are reliant on initial impressions. There will clearly be difficulty in defining and explaining 'the self ' when both the notions of causality and substance have been rejected, this results in Hume restricting himself in what he feels he can define as personal identity. Hume does not want to distinguish between the nature of personal identity and the nature of the identity we hold in single objects or ideas. Both are based in initial single impressions which the mind then assembles into a 'chimera ' of a more complex idea, constituting it 's identity. This for Hume is irrational, as there is no observable or conceivable necessary connection between past, present and future sense data, resulting in the self being strictly and thriftily described by Hume as 'a bundle of perceptions '.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While many rationalists such as René Descartes support the notion that the concept of Inception is not possible, empiricists such as David Hume may think differently. Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher known for his system of radical and philosophical empiricism, skepticism, and naturalism. In one of his works, Hume stated that one cannot create completely new ideas without either prior knowledge of those ideas, or experiencing those ideas. Put differently, he believed that the ideas of an individual are derived or inspired by other ideas that the individual has observed, because there is no such thing as an “original idea.” Taking Hume’s theory into account, in the movie Inception, the protagonist Dom Cobb teaches his new architect, Ariadne, how dreaming works. In their shared dream, Ariadne comes across Dom’s wife, Mal. While this…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrates vs Sophists

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A. Secularists--skeptical or cynical of religion. Although none of these men grew up in an 'atheistic' culture, their experience with the variety different cultures and religions in the Mediterranean and Aegean communities and their keen use of reason to examine these various cultures, convinced them that there is no compelling reason to favor one religion over another. This lead to a skepticism toward any supposed 'truth' to be found in religion. Many older sophists,…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics