Preview

Current Affairs Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Current Affairs Analysis
Current Affairs Analysis #2
Zhazira Zhalgasbayeva
Due October 11, 2013

Iran is publicly known to have been developing its nuclear program since 2002. Despite the assurances by Iranian policymakers of energy production intentions, international community – mainly US and Europe – remains skeptical about the true aims of Iran’s searches for nuclear capability. Continuous inspections of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) followed by numerous resolutions and economic sanctions imposed by US and allies haven’t to day been successful in halting country’s enrichment program. However, with a newly elected president Hassan Rouhani, some argue, the situation might move in a new direction, since he expressed the long missing willingness of Iran to negotiate on its nuclear program with US in particular.
On UN General Assembly meeting that was held recently Mr Rouhani “called for stricter controls on nuclear weapons as part of a global effort to eventually rid the world of them” (2013). “No nation should possess nuclear weapons; since there are no right hands for these wrong weapons,” – the article in the BBC News website sites (2013). Nevertheless these statements are ambiguous and do not indicate whether Iran is really planning on shutting down its nuclear development program or is it covering up the nuclear arms acquisition process at home by pretending to adhere to non-proliferation principles internationally.
Though the authenticity of Iran’s political intentions and the nature of the nuclear development program itself is the matter of debate, the reasoning strategies of Iranian officials for both proliferation and non-proliferation can be argued to go in line with Sagan’s norms model. In “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?” Sagan presents three theoretical frameworks for states proliferation actions – the security model, the domestic politics model and the norms model. The third can though be applicable for both proliferation and non-proliferation



References: “Iran nuclear programme: US and China call for response”, BBC News, 26 September, 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24286548 Sagan, Scott D. 1996-1997. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb”. International Security 21 (3).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hoomad M. (2012). Iran Cannot be Stopped with Sanctions Retrieved on February 22nd 2014 from…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just recently, politicians in the United States praised the treaty with Iran, but the public found many issues with it. Such as, the twenty-four-hour warning on when they are to make "surprise visits" to the Iranian nuclear facilities (Brookhiser). Furthering the American and Iranian tension, Iran's greatest leaders are now struggling to approach how they are going to make a peace treaty with their great enemy. "We have announced that we will not negotiate with the Americans on any issue other than the nuclear case," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader said, "prepare for the continuation of the fight against America” (Erdbrink). Iran announces that it will only make deals with the United States on nuclear weapons in the hope of it leading to a friendlier relationship between Iran and other countries…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After 1953, Iran returned to its old ways, with a Shah regime that was fully backed by the powers of the U.S. and Britain and Iran’s oil was once again flowing under the control of foreign nations. Over the next 25 years, the Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, ruled his autocracy with arrogance and opulence, as he received millions of dollars in foreign aid in return for 80 percent of Iran’s oil reserves going to the Americans and the British.2 Overall, the Shah…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of Iran developing a nuclear weapon has undoubtedly sparked up an international debate on both sides of the isle. While many in the west debate about which actions to take to prevent the development of the bomb or if Iran is even developing the bomb other countries like Russian and China have been reluctant to criticize. From a western perspective we have to decide whether or not a patient diplomacy is the best approach to Iran’s nuclear problem or not. The consequences of attacking Iran could prove to be just as disastrous as not attacking Iran and being threatened by ban attack. In “Taking Side” two scholars on this issue debate this very question. Christopher Hemmer, from “Responding to a Nuclear Iran” and Norman Podhoretz, editor-at-large for the opinion journal “Commentary” argue on both sides of the issue. This is a general overview of the situation, a summary of each authors main points and a conclusion based on my own opinion.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bakhash, Shaul, and Robin Wright. “The U.S. and Iran: An Offer They Can’t Refuse?” Foreign Policy, no. 108 (1997): 124-137. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1149094.…

    • 7054 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    iran nuclear deal

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    summarized the deal as: "This deal means that we agree that it is necessary to…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military insurgents

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    strategies the Iranian government has been trying to employ against the US and its allies. The lecture…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Terror

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As technology advanced, countries struggled for power in an arms and space race throughout the Cold War in 1947. The United States was facing conflict with the Soviet Union, but still provided assistance to Iran and Iraq. America offered support by pressuring reform on Iran, which was suffering from a collapsing economy and a failing regime.1 According to Lisa Wolfe Iran did not fully embrace the support, “Misperception of US motives behind the move for internal change led many to ignore the fact that the US cared about Iran’s domestic politics only so far as they impacted the superpower’s own national interest.”1 The people of Iran believed the United States only had their own good intentions in mind. The United States did take the Iraqi side during the Iran-Iraq War, but China provided Iran with 22 percent of its arms.1 Iran was not at a complete disadvantage in the war, they had a form…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Iran

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Iran, a beautiful country, is like a rose; it has it’s thorns. One of these major thorns is the fact that they have nuclear power and could be planning on using it to attack the west or even their neighbors. That is why the United States proposed a deal with iran, the deal is to release sanctions on them and in turn they will only be able to make low grade uranium. The united states should push for the Iran deal because iran has the resources and knowledge to make a nuclear bomb and , the US believes it is in the worlds best interest to block iran from making this weapon, and come to agreements about their future.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concern of weapons of mass destruction is perhaps one of the largest growing issues in the world today. These weapons are a threat to everyone; actually, they are a threat to the existence of the world, and it is for this simple reason, why there is concern regarding this topic all over the globe. " [The threat of weapons of mass destruction is] A Damocles sword poised on the neck of the human race, the magnitude of the threat they pose cannot be overstated" (Sid-Ahmed, 1). It is for this reason efforts are being made to ban the use of and/or destroy weapons of mass destruction all over the world. The question is, will the prohibition and destruction of weapons benefit the world or will it put us at a disadvantage?…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays